Literature DB >> 26890953

How Effective is Physical Therapy for Common Low Back Pain Diagnoses?: A Multivariate Analysis of 4597 Patients.

Ananth S Eleswarapu1, Srikanth N Divi1, Douglas R Dirschl1, James M Mok1, Christopher Stout2,3, Michael J Lee1.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A retrospective review.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to evaluate whether the treatment of low back pain with physical therapy results in clinically significant improvements in patient-reported pain and functional outcomes. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Low back pain is a major cause of morbidity and disability in health care. Previous studies have found poor efficacy for surgery in the absence of specific indications. A variety of nonoperative treatments are available; however, there is scant evidence to guide the practitioner as to the efficacy of these treatments.
METHODS: Four thousand five hundred ninety-seven patients who underwent physical therapy for the nonoperative treatment of low back pain were included. The primary outcome measures were pre-and post-treatment scores on the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) during activity, and NPRS during rest. Previously published thresholds for minimal clinically important difference (MCID) were used to determine the proportion of patients meeting MCID for each of our outcomes. Patients with starting values below the MCID for each variable were excluded from analysis. Logistic regression analysis was used to determine patient risk factors predictive of treatment failure.
RESULTS: About 28.5% of patients met the MCID for improvement in ODI. Presence of night symptoms, obesity, and smoking were predictors of treatment failure for ODI. Fifty-nine percent of patients met the MCID for improvement in resting NPRS, with a history of venous thromboembolism, night symptoms, psychiatric disease, workers' compensation status, smoking, and obesity predictive of treatment failure. Sixty percent of patients met the MCID for improvement in activity NPRS, with night symptoms, workers' compensation status, and smoking predictive of treatment failure.
CONCLUSION: We observed that a substantial percentage of the population did not meet MCID for pain and function following treatment of low back pain with physical therapy. Common risk factors for treatment failure included smoking and presence of night symptoms. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26890953     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001506

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  3 in total

Review 1.  Complexities of spine surgery in obese patient populations: a narrative review.

Authors:  Gennadiy A Katsevman; Scott D Daffner; Nicholas J Brandmeir; Sanford E Emery; John C France; Cara L Sedney
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2019-12-24       Impact factor: 4.166

2.  Auricular Point Acupressure Smartphone Application to Manage Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain: A Longitudinal, One-Group, Open Pilot Trial.

Authors:  Jennifer Kawi; Chao Hsing Yeh; Mengchi Li; Keenan Caswell Bs; Maurice Mazraani Md; Nada Lukkahatai PhD Rn; Sylvanus Mensah Rn; Janiece Taylor; Chakra Budhathoki; Paul Christo
Journal:  Glob Adv Health Med       Date:  2021-01-22

3.  Efficacy of abdominal trunk muscles-strengthening exercise using an innovative device in treating chronic low back pain: a controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  Ryo Kitagawa; Satoshi Kato; Satoru Demura; Yuki Kurokawa; Kazuya Shinmura; Noriaki Yokogawa; Noritaka Yonezawa; Takaki Shimizu; Norihiro Oku; Makoto Handa; Ryohei Annen; Hiroyuki Tsuchiya
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-12-14       Impact factor: 4.379

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.