Literature DB >> 26890884

Adolescent physical activity levels: discrepancies with accelerometer data analysis.

Greig R M Logan1, Scott Duncan1, Nigel K Harris1, Erica A Hinckson2, Grant Schofield1.   

Abstract

This study investigated the effects of epoch length and cut point selection on adolescent physical activity intensity quantification using vertical axis and vector magnitude (VM) measurement with the ActiGraph GT3X+ accelerometer. Four hundred and nine adolescents (211 males; 198 females) aged 12-16 years of age wore accelerometers during waking hours. The GT3X+ acceleration counts were reintegrated into 1, 5, 15, 30 and 60 s epoch lengths for both vertical axis and VM counts. One cut point was applied to vertical axis counts and three different cut points were applied to VM counts for each epoch length. Significant differences (P < 0.01) in mean total counts per day were observed between vertical axis and VM counts, and between epoch lengths for VM only. Differences in physical activity levels were observed between vertical and VM cut points, and between epoch lengths across all activity intensities. Our findings illustrate the magnitude of differences in physical activity outcomes that occur between axis measurement, cut points and epoch length. The magnitude of difference across epoch length must be considered in the interpretation of accelerometer data and seen as a confounding variable when comparing physical activity levels between studies.

Keywords:  ActiGraph; cut points; epoch; vector magnitude; youth

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26890884     DOI: 10.1080/02640414.2016.1150599

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sports Sci        ISSN: 0264-0414            Impact factor:   3.337


  8 in total

1.  Modifying Accelerometer Cut-Points Affects Criterion Validity in Simulated Free-Living for Adolescents and Adults.

Authors:  Paul R Hibbing; David R Bassett; Scott E Crouter
Journal:  Res Q Exerc Sport       Date:  2020-02-05       Impact factor: 2.500

Review 2.  A comparison of the associations between bone health and three different intensities of accelerometer-derived habitual physical activity in children and adolescents: a systematic review.

Authors:  Gemma Brailey; Brad Metcalf; Rebecca Lear; Lisa Price; Sean Cumming; Victoria Stiles
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 5.071

3.  Effect of Physical Activity on Cognitive Development: Protocol for a 15-Year Longitudinal Follow-Up Study.

Authors:  Guanggao Zhao; Minghui Quan; Liqiang Su; Hanbin Zhang; Jiayi Zhang; Jinming Zhang; Hui Fang; Zhen-Bo Cao; Zheng Zhu; Zhanbin Niu; Ru Wang; Peijie Chen
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-09-28       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Relationship between objectively measured intensity of physical activity and self-reported enjoyment of physical activity.

Authors:  Thea Schwaneberg; Franziska Weymar; Sabina Ulbricht; Marcus Dörr; Wolfgang Hoffmann; Neeltje van den Berg
Journal:  Prev Med Rep       Date:  2017-06-09

5.  Moving fast, thinking fast: The relations of physical activity levels and bouts to neuroelectric indices of inhibitory control in preadolescents.

Authors:  Dominika M Pindus; Eric S Drollette; Lauren B Raine; Shih-Chun Kao; Naiman Khan; Daniel R Westfall; Morgan Hamill; Rebecca Shorin; Emily Calobrisi; Dinesh John; Arthur F Kramer; Charles H Hillman
Journal:  J Sport Health Sci       Date:  2019-02-15       Impact factor: 7.179

6.  Web-Based Physical Activity Intervention for Latina Adolescents: Feasibility, Acceptability, and Potential Efficacy of the Niñas Saludables Study.

Authors:  Britta Larsen; Tanya Benitez; Mayra Cano; Shira S Dunsiger; Bess H Marcus; Andrea Mendoza-Vasconez; James F Sallis; Michelle Zive
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2018-05-09       Impact factor: 5.428

7.  Segmented sedentary time and physical activity patterns throughout the week from wrist-worn ActiGraph GT3X+ accelerometers among children 7-12 years old.

Authors:  Gillian McLellan; Rosie Arthur; Samantha Donnelly; Duncan S Buchan
Journal:  J Sport Health Sci       Date:  2019-02-19       Impact factor: 7.179

8.  Development of the systematic observation of COVID-19 mitigation (SOCOM): Assessing face covering and distancing in schools.

Authors:  Ricky Camplain; Nanette V Lopez; Dan M Cooper; Thomas L McKenzie; Kai Zheng; Shlomit Radom-Aizik
Journal:  J Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2021-04-30
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.