Literature DB >> 26890838

Cost implications and oncological outcomes for laparoscopic versus open surgery for right hemicolectomy.

K Habib1, S Daniels1, M Lee1, V Proctor1, A Saha1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Recent studies have suggested that laparoscopic surgery for colorectal resection confers a cost benefit compared with open surgery. These studies have considered a wide range of colorectal operations together rather than focusing on a single procedure. Our study compared direct clinical costs for laparoscopic versus open right hemicolectomy.
METHODS: Clinicopathological data and cost of treatment for all patients who underwent a right hemicolectomy between 2012 and 2013 were collected. The primary outcome was total cost of treatment. Secondary outcomes were length of stay, operative time and morbidity. The minimum follow-up duration was 12 months. Costs for laparoscopic and open surgery for elective resection alone were compared. Further analyses were performed comparing emergency cases with elective cases and cancer with non-cancer cases.
RESULTS: There were 83 patients who underwent a right hemicolectomy during the study period and of these, 65 had an elective procedure. The total cost of a laparoscopic procedure was £3,998.12 compared with £3,427.50 for open surgery (p=0.039). The length of stay was shorter for laparoscopic surgery while the cost of an emergency right hemicolectomy was significantly greater than for elective surgery.
CONCLUSIONS: Although the length of stay for laparoscopic surgery was shorter, this did not translate to a reduction in cost. The cost benefit from a shorter length of stay was offset by a greater cost of consumables. Cost effectiveness analyses should be designed carefully, and they should consider individual operations separately when making healthcare management and funding decisions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colon cancer; Cost analysis; Hemicolectomy; Laparoscopy

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26890838      PMCID: PMC5226162          DOI: 10.1308/rcsann.2016.0065

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl        ISSN: 0035-8843            Impact factor:   1.891


  14 in total

1.  Laparoscopic versus open hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: improvement in outcomes and similar cost.

Authors:  Robert C G Martin; Nsehniitooh A Mbah; Randy St Hill; David Kooby; Sharon Weber; Charles R Scoggins; Shishir K Maithel
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  A cost effective analysis of a laparoscopic versus an open left lateral sectionectomy in a liver transplant unit.

Authors:  Richard Bell; Sanjay Pandanaboyana; Faisal Hanif; Nehal Shah; Ernest Hidalgo; J Peter A Lodge; Giles Toogood; K Raj Prasad
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2014-11-17       Impact factor: 3.647

3.  Comparison of laparoscopic and open colonic resection within fast-track and traditional perioperative care pathways: Clinical outcomes and in-hospital costs.

Authors:  A Ehrlich; S Kellokumpu; B Wagner; H Kautiainen; I Kellokumpu
Journal:  Scand J Surg       Date:  2014-11-10       Impact factor: 2.360

4.  Outcome of laparoscopic versus open resection for rectal cancer in elderly patients.

Authors:  Wei-gen Zeng; Zhi-xiang Zhou; Hui-rong Hou; Jian-wei Liang; Hai-tao Zhou; Zheng Wang; Xing-mao Zhang; Jun-jie Hu
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2014-08-13       Impact factor: 2.192

5.  Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Pierre J Guillou; Philip Quirke; Helen Thorpe; Joanne Walker; David G Jayne; Adrian M H Smith; Richard M Heath; Julia M Brown
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005 May 14-20       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 6.  Laparoscopic versus Open surgery for small bowel Crohn's disease.

Authors:  Bobby Vm Dasari; Damian McKay; Keith Gardiner
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2011-01-19

Review 7.  Long-term outcome of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: a cochrane systematic review of randomised controlled trials.

Authors:  Esther Kuhry; Wolfgang Schwenk; Robin Gaupset; Ulla Romild; Jaap Bonjer
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rev       Date:  2008-05-12       Impact factor: 12.111

8.  Open right colectomy is still effective compared to laparoscopy: results of a randomized trial.

Authors:  Marco Braga; Matteo Frasson; Andrea Vignali; Walter Zuliani; Valerio Di Carlo
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Randomized trial of laparoscopic-assisted resection of colorectal carcinoma: 3-year results of the UK MRC CLASICC Trial Group.

Authors:  David G Jayne; Pierre J Guillou; Helen Thorpe; Philip Quirke; Joanne Copeland; Adrian M H Smith; Richard M Heath; Julia M Brown
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-07-20       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Laparoscopic versus open colorectal resection for cancer and polyps: a cost-effectiveness study.

Authors:  Jake Jordan; Henry Dowson; Heather Gage; Daniel Jackson; Timothy Rockall
Journal:  Clinicoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2014-09-26
View more
  2 in total

1.  Right colectomy from open to robotic - a single-center experience with functional outcomes in a learning-curve setting.

Authors:  Andreas Hecker; Martin Reichert; Markus Hirschburger; Rolf Schneider; Sophie Kraenzlein; Winfried Padberg
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2022-06-09       Impact factor: 3.445

2.  Procedural and post-operative complications associated with laparoscopic versus open abdominal surgery for right-sided colonic cancer resection: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yong Sheng Li; Fan Chun Meng; Jun Kai Lin
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-10-02       Impact factor: 1.817

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.