S J Moug1, M Stechman2, K McCarthy3, L Pearce4, P K Myint5, J Hewitt6,7. 1. Royal Alexandra Hospital , Paisley , UK. 2. University Hospital of Wales , Cardiff , UK. 3. North Bristol NHS Trust , UK. 4. Manchester Royal Infirmary , UK. 5. University of Aberdeen; Aberdeen Royal Infirmary , UK. 6. University Hospital Llandough , Cardiff , UK. 7. on behalf of The Older Persons Surgical Outcomes Collaboration (OPSOC).
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Older patients (>65 years of age) admitted as general surgical emergencies increasingly require improved recognition of their specific needs relative to younger patients. Two such needs are frailty and cognitive impairment. These are evolving research areas that the emergency surgeon increasingly requires knowledge of to improve short- and long-term patient outcomes. METHODS: This paper reviews the evidence for frailty and cognitive impairment in the acute surgical setting by defining frailty and cognitive impairment, introducing methods of diagnosis, discussing the influence on prognosis and proposing strategies to improve older patient outcomes. RESULTS: Frailty is present in 25% of the older surgical population. Using frailty-scoring tools, frailty was associated with a significantly longer hospital stay and higher mortality at 30 and 90 days after admission to an acute surgical unit. Cognitive impairment is present in a high number of older acute surgical patients (approximately 70%), whilst acute onset cognitive impairment, termed delirium, is documented in 18%. However, patients with delirium had significantly longer hospital stays and higher in-hospital mortality than those with cognitive impairment. CONCLUSIONS: Improved knowledge of frailty and delirium by the emergency surgeon allows the specialised needs of older surgical patients to be taken into account. Early recognition, and consideration of minimally invasive surgery or radiological intervention alongside potentially transferable successful elective interventions such as comprehensive geriatric assessment, may help to improve short- and long-term patient outcomes in this vulnerable population.
INTRODUCTION: Older patients (>65 years of age) admitted as general surgical emergencies increasingly require improved recognition of their specific needs relative to younger patients. Two such needs are frailty and cognitive impairment. These are evolving research areas that the emergency surgeon increasingly requires knowledge of to improve short- and long-term patient outcomes. METHODS: This paper reviews the evidence for frailty and cognitive impairment in the acute surgical setting by defining frailty and cognitive impairment, introducing methods of diagnosis, discussing the influence on prognosis and proposing strategies to improve older patient outcomes. RESULTS: Frailty is present in 25% of the older surgical population. Using frailty-scoring tools, frailty was associated with a significantly longer hospital stay and higher mortality at 30 and 90 days after admission to an acute surgical unit. Cognitive impairment is present in a high number of older acute surgical patients (approximately 70%), whilst acute onset cognitive impairment, termed delirium, is documented in 18%. However, patients with delirium had significantly longer hospital stays and higher in-hospital mortality than those with cognitive impairment. CONCLUSIONS: Improved knowledge of frailty and delirium by the emergency surgeon allows the specialised needs of older surgical patients to be taken into account. Early recognition, and consideration of minimally invasive surgery or radiological intervention alongside potentially transferable successful elective interventions such as comprehensive geriatric assessment, may help to improve short- and long-term patient outcomes in this vulnerable population.
Authors: Ziad S Nasreddine; Natalie A Phillips; Valérie Bédirian; Simon Charbonneau; Victor Whitehead; Isabelle Collin; Jeffrey L Cummings; Howard Chertkow Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2005-04 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: L P Fried; C M Tangen; J Walston; A B Newman; C Hirsch; J Gottdiener; T Seeman; R Tracy; W J Kop; G Burke; M A McBurnie Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2001-03 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Jane S Saczynski; Edward R Marcantonio; Lien Quach; Tamara G Fong; Alden Gross; Sharon K Inouye; Richard N Jones Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2012-07-05 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Vanessa P Ho; Wyatt P Bensken; Heena P Santry; Christopher W Towe; David F Warner; Alfred F Connors; Siran M Koroukian Journal: Surgery Date: 2022-04-06 Impact factor: 4.348
Authors: Phyo Kyaw Myint; Stephanie Owen; Kathryn McCarthy; Lyndsay Pearce; Susan J Moug; Michael J Stechman; Jonathan Hewitt; Ben Carter Journal: Geriatr Gerontol Int Date: 2018-03-01 Impact factor: 2.730
Authors: Hui Sian Tay; Adrian D Wood; Ben Carter; Lyndsay Pearce; Kathryn McCarthy; Michael J Stechman; Phyo K Myint; Jonathan Hewitt Journal: Front Surg Date: 2020-11-16