Edmund Tsui1, Erin Fogel, Katrina Hansen, Elizabeth A Talbot, Roza Tammer, Jessa Fogel, Elizabeth R Daly, James Noble, Lynda Caine, Michael E Zegans. 1. *Department of Surgery, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH; †Department of Ophthalmology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY; ‡Concord Eye Center, Concord, NH; §Division of Public Health Services, New Hampshire Department of Health and Human Services, Concord, NH; ¶Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH; ‖Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH; **Concord Hospital, Concord, NH; and ††Section of Ophthalmology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To describe 2 Candida interface keratitis infections occurring in the setting of positive donor rim cultures from precut corneal tissue used for Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) and the ensuing public health investigation. METHODS: Following 2 clinical Candida interface keratitis infections, patients from 2012 to 2014 in the same surgical center were evaluated for bacterial and fungal rim cultures and subsequent infection. All cases of fungal infections occurring post-DSAEK were analyzed. Data included patient demographics, surgical technique, donor rim cultures, donor mate outcomes, clinical courses, and outcomes. A review of the relevant literature was also undertaken. RESULTS: From 2012 to 2014, among 99 DSAEK procedures performed, 7 (7.1%) donor rim cultures were positive for fungi. Use of this tissue with positive donor rim cultures resulted in 2 (28.6%) episodes of confirmed fungal interface keratitis, both Candida species, and presumptive treatment in an additional 2 patients. An investigation did not identify any breach in sterile technique or procedures by the surgeon or surgery center. Our literature review identified 15 reports of postoperative fungal infection associated with DSAEK, of which 11 involved Candida spp. CONCLUSIONS: While postoperative infection remains rare, our 2 additional cases along with those previously reported suggest that DSAEK may be susceptible to infection with Candida spp. Furthermore, this report of correlated rim cultures and clinical infection suggests a need for reevaluation of the utility of obtaining routine corneoscleral donor rim fungal culture.
PURPOSE: To describe 2 Candida interface keratitis infections occurring in the setting of positive donor rim cultures from precut corneal tissue used for Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) and the ensuing public health investigation. METHODS: Following 2 clinical Candida interface keratitis infections, patients from 2012 to 2014 in the same surgical center were evaluated for bacterial and fungal rim cultures and subsequent infection. All cases of fungal infections occurring post-DSAEK were analyzed. Data included patient demographics, surgical technique, donor rim cultures, donor mate outcomes, clinical courses, and outcomes. A review of the relevant literature was also undertaken. RESULTS: From 2012 to 2014, among 99 DSAEK procedures performed, 7 (7.1%) donor rim cultures were positive for fungi. Use of this tissue with positive donor rim cultures resulted in 2 (28.6%) episodes of confirmed fungal interface keratitis, both Candida species, and presumptive treatment in an additional 2 patients. An investigation did not identify any breach in sterile technique or procedures by the surgeon or surgery center. Our literature review identified 15 reports of postoperative fungal infection associated with DSAEK, of which 11 involved Candida spp. CONCLUSIONS: While postoperative infection remains rare, our 2 additional cases along with those previously reported suggest that DSAEK may be susceptible to infection with Candida spp. Furthermore, this report of correlated rim cultures and clinical infection suggests a need for reevaluation of the utility of obtaining routine corneoscleral donor rim fungal culture.
Authors: Sotiria Palioura; Kavitha Sivaraman; Madhura Joag; Adam Sise; Juan F Batlle; Darlene Miller; Edgar M Espana; Guillermo Amescua; Sonia H Yoo; Anat Galor; Carol L Karp Journal: Cornea Date: 2018-04 Impact factor: 2.651
Authors: Luigi Fontana; Alice Caristia; Alessandra Cornacchia; Giuseppe Russello; Antonio Moramarco Journal: Int Ophthalmol Date: 2020-09-17 Impact factor: 2.031
Authors: Shahzad I Mian; Anthony J Aldave; Elmer Y Tu; Brandon D Ayres; Bennie H Jeng; Marian S Macsai; Michael L Nordlund; Jeffrey G Penta; Sudeep Pramanik; Loretta B Szczotka-Flynn; Allison R Ayala; Wendi Liang; Maureen G Maguire; Jonathan H Lass Journal: Cornea Date: 2018-09 Impact factor: 2.651
Authors: Anna Song; Rashmi Deshmukh; Haotian Lin; Marcus Ang; Jodhbir S Mehta; James Chodosh; Dalia G Said; Harminder S Dua; Darren S J Ting Journal: Front Med (Lausanne) Date: 2021-07-07
Authors: Youssef W Naguib; Sanjib Saha; Jessica M Skeie; Timothy Acri; Kareem Ebeid; Somaya Abdel-Rahman; Sandeep Kesh; Gregory A Schmidt; Darryl Y Nishimura; Jeffrey A Banas; Min Zhu; Mark A Greiner; Aliasger K Salem Journal: Biomaterials Date: 2021-05-01 Impact factor: 15.304
Authors: Efstathia Kiatos; James J Armstrong; Cindy Ml Hutnik; Stephen M Tsioros; Monali S Malvankar-Mehta; William G Hodge Journal: Clinicoecon Outcomes Res Date: 2017-08-09
Authors: Luigi Fontana; Antonio Moramarco; Erika Mandarà; Giuseppe Russello; Alfonso Iovieno Journal: Br J Ophthalmol Date: 2018-10-24 Impact factor: 4.638