| Literature DB >> 26889207 |
E Magda Price1, Maria S Peñaherrera2, Elodie Portales-Casamar3, Paul Pavlidis4, Margot I Van Allen5, Deborah E McFadden6, Wendy P Robinson2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The incidence of neural tube defects (NTDs) declined by about 40 % in Canada with the introduction of a national folic acid (FA) fortification program. Despite the fact that few Canadians currently exhibit folate deficiency, NTDs are still the second most common congenital abnormality. FA fortification may have aided in reducing the incidence of NTDs by overcoming abnormal one carbon metabolism cycling, the process which provides one carbon units for methylation of DNA. We considered that NTDs persisting in a folate-replete population may also occur in the context of FA-independent compromised one carbon metabolism, and that this might manifest as abnormal DNA methylation (DNAm). Second trimester human placental chorionic villi, kidney, spinal cord, brain, and muscle were collected from 19 control, 22 spina bifida, and 15 anencephalic fetuses in British Columbia, Canada. DNA was extracted, assessed for methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) genotype and for genome-wide DNAm using repetitive elements, in addition to the Illumina Infinium HumanMethylation450 (450k) array.Entities:
Keywords: 450k array; Anencephaly; DNA methylation (DNAm); Epigenome-wide association study (EWAS); Illumina HumanMethylation450 BeadChip; Neural tube defects (NTDs); Spina bifida
Year: 2016 PMID: 26889207 PMCID: PMC4756451 DOI: 10.1186/s13072-016-0054-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Epigenetics Chromatin ISSN: 1756-8935 Impact factor: 4.954
Clinical characteristics of cases
| Control (CON) | Spina bifida (SB) | Anencephaly (AN) |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fetal GA (weeks); median (range) | 19.0 (14.5–23.9) | 21.8 (19.4–23.7) | 20.0 (16.7–23.3) | 0.0004, ns |
| Maternal age (years); median (range) | 30.0 (21.0–41.0) | 30.0 (20.1–40.5) | 30.4 (22.8–37.3) | ns, ns |
| Fetal sex; | 7 (37) | 16 (73) | 5 (33) | 0.03, ns |
| Fetal | ns, ns | |||
| CC | 12 (63) | 11 (50) | 6 (40) | |
| CT | 7 (37) | 7 (32) | 8 (53) | |
| TT | 0 (0) | 4 (18) | 1 (7) | |
| Fetal | ns, ns | |||
| AA | 8 (42) | 14 (64) | 6 (40) | |
| AC | 9 (47) | 6 (27) | 8 (53) | |
| CC | 2 (11) | 2 (9) | 1 (7) | |
| Available tissues; | ||||
| Chorionic villi | 16 (84) | 22 (100) | 14 (93) | |
| Kidney | 16 (84) | 20 (91) | 8 (53) | |
| Spinal cord | 9 (47) | 17 (77) | 6 (40) | |
| Brain | 11 (58) | 9 (41) | – | |
| Muscle | 13 (68) | 10 (45) | 8 (53) | |
a p values calculated by Mann–Whitney test for continuous variables and Fisher’s exact test for categorical variables
Genome-wide DNA methylation by tissue
| Chorionic villi | Kidney | Spinal cord | Brain | Muscle | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Median array average ± SD ( | Control | 0.432 ± 0.006 (16) | 0.471 ± 0.004 (16) | 0.486 ± 0.002 (9) | 0.486 ± 0.004 (11) | 0.484 ± 0.004 (13) |
| Spina bifida | 0.427 ± 0.007 (22)** | 0.470 ± 0.003 (20) | 0.481 ± 0.004 (17)* | 0.482 ± 0.004 (9) | 0.484 ± 0.003 (10) | |
| Anencephaly | 0.425 ±0.007 (14)* | 0.468 ± 0.003 (8) | 0.485 ± 0.003 (6) | – | 0.484 ±0.003 (8) | |
| Median % LINE1 DNAm ± SD ( | Control | 55.8 ± 3.8 (16) | 79.2 ± 1.5 (16) | 79.9 ± 1.5 (9) | 81.5 ± 2.0 (11) | 80.3 ± 1.4 (13) |
| Spina bifida | 56.7 ± 3.0 (22) | 78.3 ± 2.1 (20) | 80.9 ±1.7 (17) | 83.2 ± 1.4 (9) | 80.9 ± 1.6 (10) | |
| Anencephaly | 55.0 ± 2.9 (14) | 78.5 ± 1.4 (8) | 79.7 ± 1.7 (6) | – | 80.5 ± 1.4 (8) | |
| Median % Alu DNAm ± SD ( | Control | 22.6 ±1.1 (16) | 24.7 ± 1.2 (16) | 25.0 ± 0.9 (9) | 25.6 ± 1.6 (11) | 24.2 ±1.0 (13) |
| Spina bifida | 22.3 ± 1.1 (22) | 24.8 ± 1.5 (20) | 26.1 ± 1.6 (17) | 25.4 ± 1.2 (9) | 25.0 ± 2.2 (10) | |
| Anencephaly | 22.8 ± 1.3 (14) | 24.1 ± 2.1 (8) | 25.4 ± 0.9 (6) | – | 24.5 ± 0.6 (8) | |
p values based on comparison of spina bifida to controls or anencephaly to controls. *p < 0.05 based on 1000 permutations of Mann–Whitney test, **p < 0.01 based on 1000 permutations of Mann–Whitney test. SD standard deviation
Fig. 1Sample clustering based on array-wide DNA methylation. Unsupervised hierarchical clustering of 442,091 CpG sites clustered samples primarily by tissue type. Within a tissue, samples did not cluster by NTD status. We did note however, a cluster of eight spina bifida and one anencephaly in kidney and a cluster of 12 spina bifida and two controls in spinal cord
Fig. 2Tissue distribution of unadjusted p values from linear modeling of differential methylation in NTDs. Distribution of p values from the comparison of DNA methylation for spina bifida to control samples at each of 442,091 CpG sites (left) and for anencephaly to controls samples at each of 442,091 CpG sites (right), including fetal gestational age and sex as additive covariates. Flat distributions indicate equal likelihood of significant and non-significant tests, while left-peaking distributions indicate greater likelihood of significant tests
Fig. 3Spina bifida array-wide volcano plots. Volcano plots comparing the magnitude of difference in DNAm (adjusted delta beta) to statistical significance (−log10(adjusted P.Value)) for each CpG site (n = 442,091) in spina bifida vs. control samples
Fig. 4Differentially methylated CpG sites in the chorionic villi comparison of anencephaly cases to controls. Four CpG sites were identified as significantly differentially methylated at an FDR <0.05 and deltaβ ≥0.05. Each plot is labeled with the 450k CpG site identifier, the gene which it is closest to and average difference in DNAm between anencephaly and controls (deltaβ). Box edges are plotted at the 25th and 75th percentiles (the inter-quartile range (IQR)) and whiskers are plotted to the last sample within ± 1.5*IQR
Fig. 5Identification and investigation of persistent hits in spina bifida kidneys. a By comparing our spina bifida (SB) and control (CON) samples to an independent control group (n = 5, GEO CON), 748 of the differentially methylated kidney spina bifida CpG sites were identified as persistent hits. Persistent hits were enriched for CpG sites located in enhancers and outside of CpG islands. b Hierarchical clustering of our spina bifida and control samples based solely on persistent hits almost completely separated the spina bifida from control cases, and two groups of SB cases emerged