Jasmeet P Hayes1, Erin D Bigler2, Mieke Verfaellie3. 1. 1National Center for PTSD,VA Boston Healthcare System,Boston,Massachusetts. 2. 4Department of Psychology,Brigham Young University,Provo,Utah. 3. 2Department of Psychiatry,Boston University School of Medicine,Boston,Massachusetts.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Recent advances in neuroimaging methodologies sensitive to axonal injury have made it possible to assess in vivo the extent of traumatic brain injury (TBI) -related disruption in neural structures and their connections. The objective of this paper is to review studies examining connectivity in TBI with an emphasis on structural and functional MRI methods that have proven to be valuable in uncovering neural abnormalities associated with this condition. METHODS: We review studies that have examined white matter integrity in TBI of varying etiology and levels of severity, and consider how findings at different times post-injury may inform underlying mechanisms of post-injury progression and recovery. Moreover, in light of recent advances in neuroimaging methods to study the functional connectivity among brain regions that form integrated networks, we review TBI studies that use resting-state functional connectivity MRI methodology to examine neural networks disrupted by putative axonal injury. RESULTS: The findings suggest that TBI is associated with altered structural and functional connectivity, characterized by decreased integrity of white matter pathways and imbalance and inefficiency of functional networks. These structural and functional alterations are often associated with neurocognitive dysfunction and poor functional outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: TBI has a negative impact on distributed brain networks that lead to behavioral disturbance.
OBJECTIVES: Recent advances in neuroimaging methodologies sensitive to axonal injury have made it possible to assess in vivo the extent of traumatic brain injury (TBI) -related disruption in neural structures and their connections. The objective of this paper is to review studies examining connectivity in TBI with an emphasis on structural and functional MRI methods that have proven to be valuable in uncovering neural abnormalities associated with this condition. METHODS: We review studies that have examined white matter integrity in TBI of varying etiology and levels of severity, and consider how findings at different times post-injury may inform underlying mechanisms of post-injury progression and recovery. Moreover, in light of recent advances in neuroimaging methods to study the functional connectivity among brain regions that form integrated networks, we review TBI studies that use resting-state functional connectivity MRI methodology to examine neural networks disrupted by putative axonal injury. RESULTS: The findings suggest that TBI is associated with altered structural and functional connectivity, characterized by decreased integrity of white matter pathways and imbalance and inefficiency of functional networks. These structural and functional alterations are often associated with neurocognitive dysfunction and poor functional outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: TBI has a negative impact on distributed brain networks that lead to behavioral disturbance.
Entities:
Keywords:
Diffusion tensor imaging; corpus callosum; diffuse axonal injury; fMRI; neural networks; white matter
Authors: Scott C Matthews; Irina A Strigo; Alan N Simmons; Ryan M O'Connell; Lindsay E Reinhardt; Suzanne A Moseley Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2010-05-06 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Karen Caeyenberghs; Alexander Leemans; Marcus H Heitger; Inge Leunissen; Thijs Dhollander; Stefan Sunaert; Patrick Dupont; Stephan P Swinnen Journal: Brain Date: 2012-03-16 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: Richard Watts; Alex Thomas; Christopher G Filippi; Joshua P Nickerson; Kalev Freeman Journal: Radiology Date: 2014-03-14 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Michelle E Costanzo; Yi-Yu Chou; Suzanne Leaman; Dzung L Pham; David Keyser; Dominic E Nathan; Mary Coughlin; Paul Rapp; Michael J Roy Journal: Neurosci Lett Date: 2014-06-04 Impact factor: 3.046
Authors: Katelyn L Arnemann; Anthony J-W Chen; Tatjana Novakovic-Agopian; Caterina Gratton; Emi M Nomura; Mark D'Esposito Journal: Neurology Date: 2015-03-18 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Johan Ljungqvist; Daniel Nilsson; Maria Ljungberg; Ann Sörbo; Eva Esbjörnsson; Catherine Eriksson-Ritzén; Thomas Skoglund Journal: Brain Inj Date: 2011 Impact factor: 2.311
Authors: Michael C Stevens; David Lovejoy; Jinsuh Kim; Howard Oakes; Inam Kureshi; Suzanne T Witt Journal: Brain Imaging Behav Date: 2012-06 Impact factor: 3.978
Authors: Tero Ilvesmäki; Teemu M Luoto; Ullamari Hakulinen; Antti Brander; Pertti Ryymin; Hannu Eskola; Grant L Iverson; Juha Ohman Journal: Brain Date: 2014-05-11 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: Robert Louis Ruff; Ronald George Riechers; Xiao-Feng Wang; Traci Piero; Suzanne Smith Ruff Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2012-03-18 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Danielle R Sullivan; Jasmeet P Hayes; Ginette Lafleche; David H Salat; Mieke Verfaellie Journal: J Int Neuropsychol Soc Date: 2018-06-29 Impact factor: 2.892
Authors: Evan M Gordon; Randall S Scheibel; Laura Zambrano-Vazquez; Meilin Jia-Richards; Geoffrey J May; Eric C Meyer; Steven M Nelson Journal: J Neurotrauma Date: 2018-01-29 Impact factor: 5.269
Authors: Allison R Kaup; Carrie Peltz; Kimbra Kenney; Joel H Kramer; Ramon Diaz-Arrastia; Kristine Yaffe Journal: J Int Neuropsychol Soc Date: 2016-10-04 Impact factor: 2.892