Literature DB >> 26888338

A comparison of the efficacy of piperacillin-tazobactam and cefoperazone-sulbactam therapies in the empirical treatment of patients with febrile neutropenia.

Aynur Aynioglu1, Birsen Mutlu, Abdullah Hacihanefioglu.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Empirical antibiotic therapy in neutropenic patients presenting with fever plays a significant role in reducing mortality related to infection. Empirical therapies with broad-spectrum intravenous bactericidal, anti-pseudomonal antibiotics are accepted treatments for febrile neutropenic patients. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of piperacillin-tazobactam (PIP-TAZO) and cefoperozone-sulbactam (CS) therapies in adult patients with haematological malignancies presenting with neutropenic fever in a prospective study design.
METHODS: Patients with haematological malignancies (leukaemia, lymphoma, multiple myeloma, and myelodysplastic syndrome) were recruited from June 2010-May 2013. Participants were over 18 years old, with an absolute neutrophil count (ANC) of less than 500/mm³ following chemotherapy or expected to have an ANC less than 500/mm³ in the first 48 h post-chemotherapy, and with an oral body temperature ≥ 38.3°C at a single measurement or 38.0°C after 1-h monitoring. Patients were randomised to the two treatment groups. The initial empirical therapy comprised PIP-TAZO (4.5 g/6 h/day, IV) and CS (2 g/8 h/day, IV).
RESULTS: The overall success rate was 61% with CS and 49% with PIP-TAZO (p =0.247). Factors affecting the treatment success included a neutrophil count <100/mm3, being in the relapse/refractory stage of malignancy, and the presence of a microbiologically documented infection (p <0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: PIP-TAZO and CS monotherapies are equally effective and safe for the empirical treatment of febrile neutropenic patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26888338

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rev Esp Quimioter        ISSN: 0214-3429            Impact factor:   1.553


  2 in total

1.  Cefepime vs. cefoperazone/sulbactam in combination with amikacin as empirical antibiotic therapy in febrile neutropenia.

Authors:  M Ponraj; Biswajit Dubashi; B H Harish; S Kayal; S L Cyriac; Jogamaya Pattnaik; K Ranjith; Unni S Pillai; Naresh Jadhav; Kiran K Matta; Jagdeep Singh; Esha Jaffa; Bhanu Prakash
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  Efficacy and safety of cefoperazone-sulbactam in empiric therapy for febrile neutropenia: A systemic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Shao-Huan Lan; Shen-Peng Chang; Chih-Cheng Lai; Li-Chin Lu; Hung-Jen Tang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 1.817

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.