Literature DB >> 26886552

Mini-laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for apical and posterior female pelvic organ prolapse.

Mija Blaganje1, Fouad Lutfallah1, Bruno Deval2.   

Abstract

AIM OF THE VIDEO: Mini-laparoscopic surgery is the future for most laparoscopic procedures. Although already applied in some gynaecological surgical interventions, this video is to our knowledge the first publication on the use of the mini-laparoscopic approach to sacrocolpopexy for apical and posterior pelvic organ prolapse following total hysterectomy.
METHODS: The concept of mini-laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy presented in this video article was performed on 12 women with post-hysterectomy apical and posterior pelvic organ prolapse using mini-laparoscopic instruments and ports of 3 mm in diameter combined with a 12-mm umbilical port. Surgery was performed with the same principles as for the conventional laparoscopic procedure.
RESULTS: The mean operating time was 70 min (SD ± 12). The tensile strength of the mini-laparoscopic instruments allowed appropriate manipulation of tissue consistent with that of conventional instruments. No difficulties or complications were experienced in comparison to a conventional technique. All patients were discharged from hospital on day 1 postoperatively.
CONCLUSIONS: The effectiveness, safety and feasibility of the mini-laparoscopic surgical technique was applied to sacrocolpopexy. Because of the initial favourable experience, the mini-laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy could become more widely used in the future.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Mini-laparoscopy; Pelvic organ prolapse; Sacrocolpopexy

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26886552     DOI: 10.1007/s00192-016-2960-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urogynecol J        ISSN: 0937-3462            Impact factor:   2.894


  8 in total

1.  Minilaparoscopic Single-Site Total Hysterectomy.

Authors:  Fabio Ghezzi; Maurizio Serati; Jvan Casarin; Stefano Uccella
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 7.661

2.  Incisions do not simply sum.

Authors:  Thane Blinman
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-01-07       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Laparoscopic management of incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  Anna C Frick; Marie Fidela R Paraiso
Journal:  Clin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 2.190

4.  The vaginal profile.

Authors:  W F Baden; T A Walker; J H Lindsey
Journal:  Tex Med       Date:  1968-05

5.  Laparoscopic sacral colpopexy for vaginal vault prolapse.

Authors:  C H Nezhat; F Nezhat; C Nezhat
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 6.  Is smaller necessarily better? A systematic review comparing the effects of minilaparoscopic and conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy on patient outcomes.

Authors:  Rory McCloy; Delia Randall; Stephan A Schug; Henrik Kehlet; Christian Simanski; Francis Bonnet; Frederic Camu; Barrie Fischer; Girish Joshi; Narinder Rawal; Edmund A M Neugebauer
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-09-20       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Microlaparoscopy in urogynecology: LSH and sacrocervicopexy.

Authors:  Peter L Rosenblatt; Sonia R Adams; Alex Shapiro
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol       Date:  2013 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.137

8.  Total microlaparoscopic radical hysterectomy in early cervical cancer.

Authors:  Francesco Fanfani; Valerio Gallotta; Anna Fagotti; Cristiano Rossitto; Elisa Piovano; Giovanni Scambia
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2013 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.172

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.