| Literature DB >> 26886431 |
Luiz Fernando Rolim de Almeida1, Roberto de Oliveira Portella1, Jennifer Bufalo1, Márcia Ortiz Mayo Marques2, Roselaine Facanali2, Fernando Frei3.
Abstract
The present study aimed to evaluate the effect of seasonal and diurnal events on the chemical profile of the essential oil obtained from the leaves of Copaifera langsdorffii Desf. This study was performed in a Brazilian savanna named Cerrado. We identified the best harvesting period for obtaining the highest amount of compounds used for commercial and industrial purposes. The chemical profile of the essential oils was evaluated by GC-FID and GC-MS, and the results were assessed through multivariate analyses. The data showed that the time of day and seasonal variations affect the quality of the essential oil obtained. Leaves harvested at the end of the day (5:00 pm) in the dry season resulted in richer essential oils with higher amounts of non-oxygenated sesquiterpenes. To the best of our knowledge, environmental conditions induce metabolic responses in the leaves of C. langsdorffii, which changes the patterns of sesquiterpene production. Therefore, these factors need to be considered to obtain better concentrations of bioactive compounds for pharmacological studies.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26886431 PMCID: PMC4757570 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0149332
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Average of essential oil composition and yield of Copaifera langsdorffii Desf. from a semideciduous seasonal forest at 6:00 am and 5:00 pm during the wet and dry seasons.
| Compounds (%) | Wet season | Dry season | RI exp | RI lit | Method of identification | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6:00 am | 5:00 pm | t-test | 6:00 am | 5:00 pm | t-test | ||||
| α-Copaene | 0.24 ± 0.04 | 0.34 ± 0.13 | ns | tr | 1.49 ± 0.62 | - | 1373 | 1376 | MS, RI |
| β-Elemene | 0.79 ± 0.29 | 0.82 ± 0.14 | ns | tr | 1.21 ± 0.50 | - | 1389 | 1391 | MS, RI |
| β –Caryophyllene | 5.47 ± 6.19 | 2.15 ± 0.79 | ns | 1.07 ± 0.77 | 9.02 ± 0.17 | 1416 | 1418 | MS, RI | |
| γ-Gurjunene | tr | tr | - | tr | 0.29 ± 0.05 | - | 1426 | 1432 | MS, RI |
| γ-Elemene | tr | tr | - | tr | tr | - | 1436 | 1439 | MS, RI |
| α –Humulene | 0.88 ± 0.89 | 0.40 ± 0.07 | ns | tr | 1.30 ± 0.14 | - | 1450 | 1454 | MS, RI |
| γ-Muurolene | 0.56 ±0.26 | 0.54 ± 0.10 | ns | 0.40 ± 0.37 | 1.31 ± 0.09 | 1476 | 1477 | MS, RI | |
| Germacrene D | 14.11 ± 14.88 | 7.73 ± 4.98 | ns | 4.01 ± 4.44 | 17.99 ± 4.35 | 1478 | 1480 | MS, RI | |
| Bicyclogermacrene | 4.72 ± 5.33 | 2.33 ± 1.14 | ns | 1.51 ± 1.86 | 5.68 ± 0.91 | 1495 | 1494 | MS, RI | |
| α –Muurolene | 0.54 ± 0.55 | 0.26 ± 0.06 | ns | 0.47 ± 0.48 | 1.38 ± 0.09 | 1497 | 1499 | MS, RI | |
| γ-Cadinene | 0.63 ± 0.27 | 0.51 ± 0.09 | ns | 0.79 ± 0.54 | 1.31 ± 0.17 | ns | 1512 | 1513 | MS, RI |
| δ-Cadinene | 3.07 ± 2.12 | 1.80 ± 0.67 | ns | 1.75 ± 1.75 | 2.72 ± 0.33 | ns | 1522 | 1524 | MS, RI |
| Germacrene B | 1.48 ± 0.64 | 1.72 ± 0.09 | ns | 1.36 ± 0.31 | 1.80 ± 1.49 | ns | 1557 | 1556 | MS, RI |
| Spathulenol | 27.39 ± 16.31 | 35.65 ± 3.54 | ns | 25.90 ± 12.28 | 12.55 ± 11.11 | ns | 1576 | 1576 | MS, RI |
| Caryophyllene oxide | 14.49 ± 7.03 | 16.32 ± 3.63 | ns | 16.55 ± 5.56 | 7.40 ± 1.14 | ns | 1581 | 1581 | MS, RI |
| Humulene epoxy II | 2.12 ± 1.46 | 2.59 ± 0.04 | ns | 2.63 ± 0.40 | 1.73 ± 0.08 | 1604 | 1606 | MS, RI | |
| α-Cadinol | 3.25 ± 0.99 | 3.2 ± 0.46 | ns | 7.93 ± 4.54 | 5.24 ± 0.94 | ns | 1650 | 1653 | MS, RI |
| Non-oxygenated sesquiterpenes | 32.49 | 18.60 | 11.36 | 45.50 | |||||
| Oxygenated sesquiterpenes | 47.25 | 57.76 | 53.01 | 26.92 | |||||
| Ratio (Non-oxygenated sesquiterpenes/Oxygenated sesquiterpenes) | 0.69 | 0.32 | 0.21 | 1.69 | |||||
| Yield of essential oils (%) | 0.04 ± 0.02 | 0.04 ± 0.03 | ns | 0.03 ± 0.01 | 0.05 ± 0.04 | ns | |||
RIexp.: experimental Retention Index. RI lit.: Retention Index found on literature. tr: trace amount (≤ 0.001). MS, identification based on comparison of mass spectra. RI, identification based on retention index.
*p ≤ 0.05 (statistical significance).
ns: non-significant.
Fig 1PCA of the main compounds present in the essential oil of Copaifera langsdorffii Desf from a semideciduous seasonal forest at 6:00 am and 5:00 pm during the dry season (DS) and the wet season (WS).
Fig 2Agglomerative Hierarchical Clustering (AHC) calculated with the Ward’s linkage and Euclidean distance, which correlates the essential oil data from a semideciduous seasonal forest.
Wet Season at 6:00 am (WS 6am) and Wet Season at 5:00 pm (WS 5pm)—Group 1; Dry Season at 6:00 am (DS 6am)—Group 2; Dry Season at 5:00 pm (DS 5pm)—Group 3.
Fig 3Box plot analyses of the major compounds (%) present in the essential oil from leaves of Copaifera langsdorffii Desf.
β-Caryophyllene, germacrene D and bicyclogermacrene (non-oxygenated sesquiterpenes); spathulenol, caryophyllene oxide and α-cadinol (oxygenated sesquiterpenes). Wet season at 6:00 am and wet season at 5:00 pm—Group 1; dry season at 6:00 am—Group 2; dry season at 5:00 pm—Group 3.