| Literature DB >> 26885507 |
Liang Tu1, Yanhui He1, Chunhui Shan1, Zhansheng Wu1.
Abstract
Inoculation of the bacterial cells of microbial seed coating agents (SCAs) into the environment may result in limited survival and colonization. Therefore, the application efficacy of an encapsulated microbial seed coating agent (ESCA) was investigated on potted cotton plants; the agent was prepared with polyvinyl alcohol, sodium dodecyl sulfate, bentonite, and microencapsulated Bacillus subtilis SL-13. Scanning electron micrography revealed that the microcapsules were attached to ESCA membranes. The ESCA film was uniform, bubble-free, and easy to peel. The bacterial contents of seeds coated with each ESCA treatment reached 10(6) cfu/seed. Results indicated that the germination rate of cotton seeds treated with ESCA4 (1.0% (w/v) sodium alginate, 4.0% polyvinyl alcohol, 1.0% sodium dodecyl sulfate, 0.6% acacia, 0.5% bentonite, and 10% (v/v) microcapsules) increased by 28.74%. Other growth factors of the cotton seedlings, such as plant height, root length, whole plant fresh weight, and whole plant dry weight, increased by 52.70%, 25.13%, 46.47%, and 33.21%, respectively. Further analysis demonstrated that the peroxidase and superoxide dismutase activities of cotton seedlings improved, whereas their malondialdehyde contents decreased. Therefore, the ESCA can efficiently improve seed germination, root length, and growth. The proposed ESCA exhibits great potential as an alternative to traditional SCA in future agricultural applications.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26885507 PMCID: PMC4738727 DOI: 10.1155/2016/3251357
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
The composition and ratio of ESCA.
| SCA types | Membrane formers (w/v%) | Dispersant (w/v%) | Thickeners (w/v%) | Bentonite (w/v%) | Microcapsules (v/v%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alginate | PVA | |||||
| ESCA1 | 1.0 | 3.0 | 1.0 | 0.3 | 0.5 | 10 |
| ESCA2 | 1.0 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 0.6 | 0.5 | 10 |
| ESCA3 | 1.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 0.9 | 0.5 | 10 |
| ESCA4 | 1.0 | 4.0 | 1.0 | 0.6 | 0.5 | 10 |
| ESCA5 | 1.0 | 4.0 | 2.0 | 0.9 | 0.5 | 10 |
| ESCA6 | 1.0 | 4.0 | 3.0 | 0.3 | 0.5 | 10 |
| ESCA7 | 1.0 | 5.0 | 1.0 | 0.9 | 0.5 | 10 |
| ESCA8 | 1.0 | 5.0 | 2.0 | 0.3 | 0.5 | 10 |
| ESCA9 | 1.0 | 5.0 | 3.0 | 0.6 | 0.5 | 10 |
Figure 1Scanning electron micrographs of the PVA-alginate film without microcapsules (a), the PVA-alginate-bentonite film without microcapsules (b), and the PVA-alginate-bentonite film with microcapsules (c and d).
Properties of ESCA.
| Samples | Suspension rate (%) | Film-forming time (min) | Film-forming properties | Swelling ratio (%) | Uniformity (%) | Shedding rate (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ESCA1 | 97.02 ± 1.23 | 8 ± 0.02 | 0 | 249.78 ± 4.21 | 86.12 ± 3.12 | 0.26 ± 0.008 |
| ESCA2 | 98.10 ± 2.31 | 9 ± 0.03 | + | 213.24 ± 3.68 | 90.64 ± 2.87 | 0.32 ± 0.012 |
| ESCA3 | 99.62 ± 2.17 | 10 ± 0.03 | + | 182.06 ± 2.56 | 95.25 ± 3.18 | 0.41 ± 0.017 |
| ESCA4 | 97.35 ± 1.09 | 8 ± 0.01 | + | 317.47 ± 3.14 | 95.57 ± 2.96 | 0.20 ± 0.004 |
| ESCA5 | 99.24 ± 2.58 | 10 ± 0.02 | + | 259.99 ± 2.17 | 95.46 ± 4.12 | 0.48 ± 0.019 |
| ESCA6 | 99.43 ± 1.74 | 12 ± 0.04 | + | 225.36 ± 1.38 | 93.28 ± 3.35 | 0.52 ± 0.023 |
| ESCA7 | 97.83 ± 0.86 | 15 ± 0.03 | 0 | 278.58 ± 2.53 | 90.65 ± 2.16 | 0.27 ± 0.006 |
| ESCA8 | 98.60 ± 1.26 | 9 ± 0.04 | + | 454.98 ± 5.86 | 94.26 ± 1.97 | 0.43 ± 0.015 |
| ESCA9 | 99.53 ± 3.12 | 12 ± 0.03 | + | 279.80 ± 3.15 | 95.34 ± 2.84 | 0.62 ± 0.024 |
Notes: mean ± standard errors. Significant differences were determined according to Student's t-test with p ≤ 0.05.
+ denotes a uniform, bubble-free, and easy to peel film formed on the glass plate; 0 represents an uneven film formed on the glass plate.
Figure 2Coating amount of functional bacteria on cotton seeds.
Effects of ESCA on germination rate and seedling biomass.
| Treatments | Germination rate (%) | Plant height (cm) | Root length (cm) | Whole plant fresh weight (g) | Whole plant dry weight (g) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NC | 46.58 ± 1.34 | 11.48 ± 0.51 | 5.30 ± 0.12 | 2.13 ± 0.038 | 1.32 ± 0.006 |
| SCAF | 58.44 ± 3.48 | 13.29 ± 0.45 | 5.84 ± 0.38 | 2.62 ± 0.045 | 1.40 ± 0.018 |
| ESCA2 | 65.67 ± 2.24 | 16.24 ± 0.63 | 6.12 ± 0.27 | 2.65 ± 0.061 | 1.53 ± 0.015 |
| ESCA4 | 75.32 ± 1.94 | 17.53 ± 0.48 | 7.06 ± 0.35 | 3.12 ± 0.076 | 1.66 ± 0.023 |
| ESCA8 | 70.64 ± 3.82 | 16.58 ± 0.53 | 6.48 ± 0.34 | 2.98 ± 0.075 | 1.61 ± 0.015 |
Notes: error bars indicate the standard error of means (±SE).
Figure 3Effect of different treatments on the MDA concentration of cotton seedlings. Error bars indicate the standard error of means (±SE).
Figure 4Effects of different seed coating agents on SOD and POD content.