Literature DB >> 26885104

A comparison of the outcome of CPR according to AHA 2005 ACLS and AHA 2010 ACLS guidelines in cardiac arrest: multicenter study.

Oktay Ocal1, Dogac Niyazi Ozucelik2, Akkan Avci3, Mustafa Yazicioglu3, Yilmaz Aydin3, Baris Murat Ayvaci3, Halil Dogan3, Kurtulus Aciksari3, Zafer Cukurova4.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate whether there is a difference in the return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) and survival with sequel-free recovery rates between the patients who underwent cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) according to 2005 and 2010 guidelines. This study was conducted in the Bakırköy Dr. Sadi Konuk and Kartal Lütfi Kırdar Training and Research Hospital between dates of October 2010 and 28 February 2011 after approval of Ethics Committee. In the first months of the study, CPR was performed according to AHA 2005 ACLS guidelines (Group-1), while CPR was performed according to AHA 2010 ACLS guidelines after November 2010 (Group-2). Patients were assessed for neurological deficit with Cerebral Performance Categories Scale. Mean age was found as 69.01±13.05 (minimum: 21, maximum: 92) in 86 patients included. Of the 33 patients underwent CPR in the Group 1, ROSC was achieved in 51.5%; and 6.1% of these patients were discharged. Of the 53 patients underwent CPR in the Group 2, ROSC was achieved in 37.7%; and 9.4% of these patients were discharged. Although the number of living patients in Group 2 was higher than Group 1, the difference was not found statistically significant (5 versus 2), (P>0.05). But, neurological outcomes were found better with 2010 compared to 2005 guidelines (3/7 versus 0/2 good cerebral performance). It was found that the 2005 CPR guidelines practices in ED were more successful than the 2010 CPR guidelines practices in ROSC, but less successful in the rate of discharge from hospital and neurological sequel-free discharge rate.

Entities:  

Keywords:  2005-2010 AHA guidelines; CPR; CPS; Cardiac arrest; cardiopulmonary resuscitation; cerebral performance scale

Year:  2015        PMID: 26885104      PMCID: PMC4723949     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med        ISSN: 1940-5901


  29 in total

1.  Comparative quality analysis of hands-off time in simulated basic and advanced life support following European Resuscitation Council 2000 and 2005 guidelines.

Authors:  Hendrik Ilper; Tina Kunz; Holger Pfleger; Richard Schalk; Christian Byhahn; Hanns Ackermann; Raoul Breitkreutz
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 2.740

Review 2.  Cardiopulmonary resuscitation and acute cardiovascular life support--a protocol review of the updated guidelines.

Authors:  Larry M Diamond
Journal:  Crit Care Clin       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 3.598

3.  Epidemiology and outcomes of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in Rochester, New York.

Authors:  Rollin J Fairbanks; Manish N Shah; E Brooke Lerner; Kumar Ilangovan; Elliot C Pennington; Sandra M Schneider
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2006-12-14       Impact factor: 5.262

4.  Comparison of the Cerebral Performance Category score and the Health Utilities Index for survivors of cardiac arrest.

Authors:  Ian G Stiell; Lisa P Nesbitt; Graham Nichol; Justin Maloney; Jonathan Dreyer; Tammy Beaudoin; Josée Blackburn; George A Wells
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2008-05-01       Impact factor: 5.721

5.  [Advanced cardiovascular life support in AHA Guidelines 2010: Key changes from Guidelines 2005].

Authors:  Ichiro Kaneko
Journal:  Nihon Rinsho       Date:  2011-04

6.  Cerebral Performance Category and long-term prognosis following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

Authors:  Randi Phelps; Florence Dumas; Charles Maynard; Jennifer Silver; Thomas Rea
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 7.598

7.  Paramedic response time: does it affect patient survival?

Authors:  Peter T Pons; Jason S Haukoos; Whitney Bludworth; Thomas Cribley; Kathryn A Pons; Vincent J Markovchick
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 3.451

Review 8.  Management of cardiac arrest in 2005: an update.

Authors:  Edo Kaluski; Nir Uriel; Olga Milo; Gad Cotter
Journal:  Isr Med Assoc J       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 0.892

9.  Association between Cerebral Performance Category, Modified Rankin Scale, and discharge disposition after cardiac arrest.

Authors:  Jon C Rittenberger; Ketki Raina; Margo B Holm; Young Joo Kim; Clifton W Callaway
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2011-04-13       Impact factor: 5.262

10.  Outcome of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in New York City. The Pre-Hospital Arrest Survival Evaluation (PHASE) Study.

Authors:  G Lombardi; J Gallagher; P Gennis
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1994-03-02       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  2 in total

1.  Effects of advanced life support versus basic life support on the mortality rates of patients with trauma in prehospital settings: a study protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yutaka Kondo; Tatsuma Fukuda; Ryo Uchimido; Toru Hifumi; Kei Hayashida
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-10-22       Impact factor: 2.692

2.  Advanced Life Support vs. Basic Life Support for Patients With Trauma in Prehospital Settings: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Yutaka Kondo; Tatsuma Fukuda; Ryo Uchimido; Masahiro Kashiura; Soichiro Kato; Hiroshi Sekiguchi; Yoshito Zamami; Toru Hifumi; Kei Hayashida
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-03-26
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.