| Literature DB >> 26884757 |
Nitha V Panicker1, A Sukesh Kumar1.
Abstract
Telehealth systems benefit from the rapid growth of mobile communication technology for measuring physiological signals. Development and validation of a tablet PC enabled noninvasive body sensor system for rural telehealth application are discussed in this paper. This system includes real time continuous collection of physiological parameters (blood pressure, pulse rate, and temperature) and fall detection of a patient with the help of a body sensor unit and wireless transmission of the acquired information to a tablet PC handled by the medical staff in a Primary Health Center (PHC). Abnormal conditions are automatically identified and alert messages are given to the medical officer in real time. Clinical validation is performed in a real environment and found to be successful. Bland-Altman analysis is carried out to validate the wrist blood pressure sensor used. The system works well for all measurements.Entities:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26884757 PMCID: PMC4739462 DOI: 10.1155/2016/5747961
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Telemed Appl ISSN: 1687-6415
Review on wearable systems for healthcare.
| Project title | Hardware description | Medical application |
|---|---|---|
| AMON [ | Wrist worn device, GSM | High risk cardiac/respiratory patients |
| LifeGuard [ | Microcontroller, serial cables | Monitoring in extreme environment (terrestrial application) |
| RTWPMS [ | Cordless phone, RS232 cables | General remote health monitoring |
| SmartVest [ | Woven sensors | General remote health monitoring |
| Wearable Belt [ | Chest worn device, serial cables | General monitoring of cardiac and respiratory patients |
| ZigBee-Based Monitoring [ | Wrist worn device, ZigBee Technology | General remote sensing of heart rate and temperature |
| Smart-Clothes Platform [ | Woven sensors, USB cables | General monitoring of cardiac and respiratory patients |
Figure 2Proposed telehealth system architecture with remote monitoring facility.
Figure 1Block diagram of the developed body sensor unit.
Figure 3Hardware setup (BSU, microcontroller development board, Tablet PC, and mobile phone).
Figure 4Conduction of testing with wrist device.
Figure 5Age and frequency of subjects under study.
Figure 6Frequency of SBP and DBP for male and female subjects using sphygmomanometric method.
Figure 7Screen shots of output observed on the tablet PC.
Figure 8Scatter plot of difference and average of parameters taken by wrist sensor method and sphygmomanometric method.
Figure 9Scatter plot of of wrist sensor on that of sphygmomanometric method.
Correlation study and Bland-Altman analysis results for device comparison.
| Subject | Parameter | Cab | Bias ± SD | Limits of agreement |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male | Systole | 0.8804 | 6.9027 ± 10.6544 | 1.0023 |
| Male | Diastole | 0.8386 | −0.6637 ± 6.7818 | 0.6380 |
| Female | Systole | 0.8920 | 4.4775 ± 7.9157 | 0.5933 |
| Female | Diastole | 0.8284 | −0.1798 ± 6.4160 | 0.4809 |
Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy when comparing sphygmomanometer and wrist method.
| Subject | Sensitivity | Specificity | Accuracy |
|---|---|---|---|
| Male (113) | 52.63% | 94.64% | 73.45% |
| Female (178) | 63.49% | 95.65% | 84.27% |
| Total (291) | 58.33% | 95.32% | 80.07% |
Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for fall detection system.
| Type of fall | Sensitivity | Specificity | Accuracy |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hard fall (stand position towards floor) | 87.5% | 75% | 80% |
| Hard fall (stand position towards bed) | 71.42% | 69.23% | 70% |
| Soft fall (stand position towards floor) | 62.5% | 58.33% | 60% |
| Soft fall (stand position towards bed) | 55.55% | 54.54% | 55% |