Literature DB >> 26884560

Trends in Health-Related Quality of Life After a Diagnosis of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ.

Vicki Hart1, Brian L Sprague2, Susan G Lakoski2, John M Hampton2, Polly A Newcomb2, Ronald E Gangnon2, Amy Trentham-Dietz2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Studies of quality of life (QoL) are scarce among survivors of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). The objective of this study was to assess long-term QoL in DCIS survivors in relation to age at diagnosis, time since diagnosis, and treatments received.
METHODS: We assessed physical and mental measures of health-related QoL in 1,604 patients with DCIS diagnosed in 1997 to 2006 with up to four follow-up interviews. We further compared baseline QoL to 1,055 control patients without DCIS. QoL was measured using the validated Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36 Health Status Survey questionnaire. Among patients with DCIS, we examined trends in QoL over time since diagnosis using generalized linear regression models, adjusting for confounders. We tested for effect modification by surgical treatment choice, post-treatment endocrine therapy use, and age at diagnosis.
RESULTS: Both physical and mental measures of QoL among DCIS survivors at fewer than 2 years after diagnosis were comparable to controls. Mental measures of QoL among patients with DCIS declined at ≥ 10 years after diagnosis and were significantly lower than at less than 2 years after diagnosis (47.4 v 52.0; P < .01). In the first 5 years after a DCIS diagnosis, mental QoL was significantly higher among women diagnosed at ages 50 to 74 years compared with those diagnosed at ages 28 to 49 years, although this difference was not sustained in later time periods.
CONCLUSION: QoL after a DCIS diagnosis was generally comparable to that of women of similar age without a personal history of DCIS. Our findings suggest that DCIS survivors, and particularly those diagnosed at a younger age, may benefit from support for mental QoL.
© 2016 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26884560      PMCID: PMC4872345          DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2015.62.7281

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  27 in total

Review 1.  Mode of questionnaire administration can have serious effects on data quality.

Authors:  Ann Bowling
Journal:  J Public Health (Oxf)       Date:  2005-05-03       Impact factor: 2.341

2.  Effect of survey mode on response patterns: comparison of face-to-face and self-administered modes in health surveys.

Authors:  Anne Illemann Christensen; Ola Ekholm; Charlotte Glümer; Knud Juel
Journal:  Eur J Public Health       Date:  2013-06-13       Impact factor: 3.367

3.  Change in lifestyle behaviors and medication use after a diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ.

Authors:  Brian L Sprague; Amy Trentham-Dietz; Hazel B Nichols; John M Hampton; Polly A Newcomb
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2010-04-02       Impact factor: 4.872

4.  A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation.

Authors:  M E Charlson; P Pompei; K L Ales; C R MacKenzie
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1987

5.  Quality of life for women diagnosed with breast carcinoma in situ.

Authors:  Elizabeth B Claus; Stacey Petruzella; Darryl Carter; Stanislav Kasl
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-10-20       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Age at diagnosis and quality of life in breast cancer survivors.

Authors:  Bernadine Cimprich; David L Ronis; Gloria Martinez-Ramos
Journal:  Cancer Pract       Date:  2002 Mar-Apr

Review 7.  Quality-of-life issues in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ.

Authors:  Patricia A Ganz
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2010

8.  Weight gain as a risk factor for clinical diabetes mellitus in women.

Authors:  G A Colditz; W C Willett; A Rotnitzky; J E Manson
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1995-04-01       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  Early stage breast cancer: costs and quality of life one year after treatment by mastectomy or conservative surgery and radiation therapy.

Authors:  P Kenny; M T King; A Shiell; J Seymour; J Hall; A Langlands; J Boyages
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 4.380

Review 10.  A methodological review of the Short Form Health Survey 36 (SF-36) and its derivatives among breast cancer survivors.

Authors:  Charlene Treanor; Michael Donnelly
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2014-08-20       Impact factor: 4.147

View more
  3 in total

1.  Evaluation of Long-Term Satisfaction with Breast Surgery in Patients Treated for Ductal Carcinoma In Situ: A Population-Based Longitudinal Cohort Study.

Authors:  Devon Livingston-Rosanoff; Amy Trentham-Dietz; John M Hampton; Polly A Newcomb; Lee G Wilke
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-02-24       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  The association between post-diagnosis health behaviors and long-term quality of life in survivors of ductal carcinoma in situ: a population-based longitudinal cohort study.

Authors:  Vicki Hart; Amy Trentham-Dietz; Amy Berkman; Mayo Fujii; Christopher Veal; John Hampton; Ronald E Gangnon; Polly A Newcomb; Susan C Gilchrist; Brian L Sprague
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2018-02-07       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS): The importance of patient-reported outcomes (PRO).

Authors:  Laura S Dominici; Shoshana M Rosenberg
Journal:  Curr Breast Cancer Rep       Date:  2020-04-04
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.