Literature DB >> 26884557

Use of a Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment for the Management of Elderly Patients With Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: The Phase III Randomized ESOGIA-GFPC-GECP 08-02 Study.

Romain Corre1, Laurent Greillier2, Hervé Le Caër2, Clarisse Audigier-Valette2, Nathalie Baize2, Henri Bérard2, Lionel Falchero2, Isabelle Monnet2, Eric Dansin2, Alain Vergnenègre2, Marie Marcq2, Chantal Decroisette2, Jean-Bernard Auliac2, Suzanna Bota2, Régine Lamy2, Bartomeu Massuti2, Cécile Dujon2, Maurice Pérol2, Jean-Pierre Daurès2, Renaud Descourt2, Hervé Léna2, Carine Plassot2, Christos Chouaïd2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) is recommended to assess the vulnerability of elderly patients, but its integration in cancer treatment decision making has never been prospectively evaluated. Here, in elderly patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), we compared a standard strategy of chemotherapy allocation on the basis of performance status (PS) and age with an experimental strategy on the basis of CGA. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a multicenter, open-label, phase III trial, elderly patients ≥ 70 years old with a PS of 0 to 2 and stage IV NSCLC were randomly assigned between chemotherapy allocation on the basis of PS and age (standard arm: carboplatin-based doublet if PS ≤ 1 and age ≤ 75 years; docetaxel if PS = 2 or age > 75 years) and treatment allocation on the basis of CGA (CGA arm: carboplatin-based doublet for fit patients, docetaxel for vulnerable patients, and best supportive care for frail patients). The primary end point was treatment failure free survival (TFFS). Secondary end points were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival, tolerability, and quality of life.
RESULTS: Four hundred ninety-four patients were randomly assigned (standard arm, n = 251; CGA arm, n = 243). Median age was 77 years. In the standard and CGA arms, 35.1% and 45.7% of patients received a carboplatin-based doublet, 64.9% and 31.3% received docetaxel, and 0% and 23.0% received best supportive care, respectively. In the standard and CGA arms, median TFFS times were 3.2 and 3.1 months, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.76 to 1.1), and median OS times were 6.4 and 6.1 months, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.79 to 1.1). Patients in the CGA arm, compared with standard arm patients, experienced significantly less all grade toxicity (85.6% v 93.4%, respectively P = .015) and fewer treatment failures as a result of toxicity (4.8% v 11.8%, respectively; P = .007).
CONCLUSION: In elderly patients with advanced NSCLC, treatment allocation on the basis of CGA failed to improve the TFFS or OS but slightly reduced treatment toxicity.
© 2016 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26884557     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2015.63.5839

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  91 in total

1.  Geriatric Assessment and Functional Decline in Older Patients with Lung Cancer.

Authors:  L Decoster; C Kenis; D Schallier; J Vansteenkiste; K Nackaerts; L Vanacker; N Vandewalle; J Flamaing; J P Lobelle; K Milisen; J De Grève; H Wildiers
Journal:  Lung       Date:  2017-06-20       Impact factor: 2.584

2.  Chemotherapy in older adult gynecologic oncology patients: Can a phenotypic frailty score predict tolerance?

Authors:  Casey M Hay; Heidi S Donovan; Grace B Campbell; Sarah E Taylor; Li Wang; Madeleine Courtney-Brooks
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2018-11-28       Impact factor: 5.482

3.  Geriatric Assessment for Older Patients with Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: Daily Practice of Centers Participating in the NVALT25-ELDAPT Trial.

Authors:  Elisabeth J M Driessen; Judith G M van Loon; Huub A Maas; Anne-Marie C Dingemans; Maryska L G Janssen-Heijnen
Journal:  Lung       Date:  2018-04-12       Impact factor: 2.584

4.  Lung Cancer in the Oldest Old: A Nation-Wide Study in The Netherlands.

Authors:  Karlijn J G Schulkes; Carin A M Pouw; Elisabeth J M Driessen; Leontine J R van Elden; Frederiek van den Bos; Maryska L G Janssen-Heijnen; Jan-Willem J Lammers; Marije E Hamaker
Journal:  Lung       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 2.584

5.  Treatment dilemma in the care of older adults with advanced lung cancer.

Authors:  Ajeet Gajra; Ankit Anand; Kah Poh Loh; Supriya Mohile
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 6.  [Prediction of unplanned discontinuation of treatment in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer-results from the IBuTu study].

Authors:  F Honecker; U Wedding; G Kallischnigg; A Schroeder; J Klier; T Frangenheim; L Weißbach
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 0.639

7.  Undertreatment of Older Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma in the Era of Novel Therapies.

Authors:  Bita Fakhri; Mark A Fiala; Sascha A Tuchman; Tanya M Wildes
Journal:  Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk       Date:  2018-01-31

8.  Elderly selection on geriatric index assessment.

Authors:  Pascale Tomasini; Celine Mascaux; Fabrice Barlesi
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2016-06

9.  Frailty as determined by a comprehensive geriatric assessment-derived deficit-accumulation index in older patients with cancer who receive chemotherapy.

Authors:  Harvey Jay Cohen; David Smith; Can-Lan Sun; William Tew; Supriya G Mohile; Cynthia Owusu; Heidi D Klepin; Cary P Gross; Stuart M Lichtman; Ajeet Gajra; Julie Filo; Vani Katheria; Arti Hurria
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2016-08-16       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Chemotherapy Toxicity Risk Score for Treatment Decisions in Older Adults with Advanced Solid Tumors.

Authors:  Tomohiro F Nishijima; Allison M Deal; Grant R Williams; Hanna K Sanoff; Kirsten A Nyrop; Hyman B Muss
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2018-01-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.