Literature DB >> 26884354

Characterization of the indoor particles and their sources in an Antarctic research station.

Érica Coelho Pagel1,2, Neyval Costa Reis3, Cristina Engel de Alvarez4, Jane Méri Santos3, Melina Moreira Conti5, Ricardo Salvador Boldrini5, Américo Sansigolo Kerr6.   

Abstract

Many studies have been carried out on the environmental impact of the research stations on the Antarctic continent. However, the assessment of indoor air quality in these confined environments has been neglected. The main objectives of this study are to investigate the granulometric distribution of the indoor particles in the different compartments of the Brazilian Antarctic Station, to examine the number and mass concentration of the indoor particles, to conduct chemical and morphological analyses of the indoor PM2.5, and to identify the possible sources of the PM. The results showed that Na, K, Cl, Fe, Zn, S and Si were the main elements detected. High levels of black carbon were recorded in the workshop, which may be associated with the use of diesel vehicles. To identify the human activities related to the indoor particle emission in the station, the size distribution of the particles in the living room was monitored for seven consecutive days, during normal station operation. It was possible to identify the influence of individual processes, such as incineration, cooking and the movement of people, upon the particle size number concentration. The indoor/outdoor (I/O) ratio for the total suspended particles (TSP), PM10, PM2.5 and PM1 measured was significantly larger than those reported for urban buildings. In general, the I/O ratio distribution for all the compartments shows peak values between 2.5 and 10 μm, which is often related to human activity, such as cleaning, personnel circulation or clothing surfaces. The maximum I/O ratio at this range varied from 12 to 60. In addition, the compartments affected by combustion processes tend to present a significant number of submicron particles.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Antarctic station; Indoor air quality; Indoor particles; Particulate matter

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26884354     DOI: 10.1007/s10661-016-5172-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Monit Assess        ISSN: 0167-6369            Impact factor:   2.513


  7 in total

1.  Particle size distribution of aerosols and associated heavy metals in kitchen environments.

Authors:  Sandeep Gupta; Arun Srivastava; V K Jain
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2007-10-26       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Particle size and metals concentrations of dust from a paint manufacturing plant.

Authors:  Siew Lai Huang; Chun-Yang Yin; Siaw Yang Yap
Journal:  J Hazard Mater       Date:  2009-10-02       Impact factor: 10.588

3.  Characterization of atmospheric aerosols in the city of São Paulo, Brazil: comparisons between polluted and unpolluted periods.

Authors:  Taciana Toledo de Almeida Albuquerque; Maria de Fátima Andrade; Rita Yuri Ynoue
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2011-04-05       Impact factor: 2.513

Review 4.  Indoor aerosols: from personal exposure to risk assessment.

Authors:  L Morawska; A Afshari; G N Bae; G Buonanno; C Y H Chao; O Hänninen; W Hofmann; C Isaxon; E R Jayaratne; P Pasanen; T Salthammer; M Waring; A Wierzbicka
Journal:  Indoor Air       Date:  2013-05-13       Impact factor: 5.770

Review 5.  The dichotomy of relative humidity on indoor air quality.

Authors:  Peder Wolkoff; Søren K Kjaergaard
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2007-05-17       Impact factor: 9.621

6.  Residential proximity fine particles related to allergic sensitisation and asthma in primary school children.

Authors:  Isabella Annesi-Maesano; David Moreau; Denis Caillaud; François Lavaud; Yvon Le Moullec; André Taytard; Gabrielle Pauli; Denis Charpin
Journal:  Respir Med       Date:  2007-04-17       Impact factor: 3.415

7.  Characterization and aerosol mass balance of PM2.5 and PM10 collected in Conakry, Guinea during the 2004 Harmattan period.

Authors:  Jason P Weinstein; Scott R Hedges; Sue Kimbrough
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2009-12-31       Impact factor: 7.086

  7 in total
  2 in total

Review 1.  Assessment of environmental and ergonomic hazard associated to printing and photocopying: a review.

Authors:  Abhishek Nandan; N A Siddiqui; Pankaj Kumar
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  2018-10-22       Impact factor: 4.609

2.  Source Apportionment and Influencing Factor Analysis of Residential Indoor PM2.5 in Beijing.

Authors:  Yibing Yang; Liu Liu; Chunyu Xu; Na Li; Zhe Liu; Qin Wang; Dongqun Xu
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-04-05       Impact factor: 3.390

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.