Literature DB >> 26884200

Atoms of recognition in human and computer vision.

Shimon Ullman1, Liav Assif2, Ethan Fetaya2, Daniel Harari3.   

Abstract

Discovering the visual features and representations used by the brain to recognize objects is a central problem in the study of vision. Recently, neural network models of visual object recognition, including biological and deep network models, have shown remarkable progress and have begun to rival human performance in some challenging tasks. These models are trained on image examples and learn to extract features and representations and to use them for categorization. It remains unclear, however, whether the representations and learning processes discovered by current models are similar to those used by the human visual system. Here we show, by introducing and using minimal recognizable images, that the human visual system uses features and processes that are not used by current models and that are critical for recognition. We found by psychophysical studies that at the level of minimal recognizable images a minute change in the image can have a drastic effect on recognition, thus identifying features that are critical for the task. Simulations then showed that current models cannot explain this sensitivity to precise feature configurations and, more generally, do not learn to recognize minimal images at a human level. The role of the features shown here is revealed uniquely at the minimal level, where the contribution of each feature is essential. A full understanding of the learning and use of such features will extend our understanding of visual recognition and its cortical mechanisms and will enhance the capacity of computational models to learn from visual experience and to deal with recognition and detailed image interpretation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  computer vision; minimal images; object recognition; visual perception; visual representations

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26884200      PMCID: PMC4790978          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1513198113

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  15 in total

1.  Hierarchical Bayesian inference in the visual cortex.

Authors:  Tai Sing Lee; David Mumford
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 2.129

2.  Columns for visual features of objects in monkey inferotemporal cortex.

Authors:  I Fujita; K Tanaka; M Ito; K Cheng
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1992-11-26       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Object detection with discriminatively trained part-based models.

Authors:  Pedro F Felzenszwalb; Ross B Girshick; David McAllester; Deva Ramanan
Journal:  IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 6.226

4.  Top-down facilitation of visual recognition.

Authors:  M Bar; K S Kassam; A S Ghuman; J Boshyan; A M Schmid; A M Schmidt; A M Dale; M S Hämäläinen; K Marinkovic; D L Schacter; B R Rosen; E Halgren
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-01-03       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Invariance and selectivity in the ventral visual pathway.

Authors:  Stuart Geman
Journal:  J Physiol Paris       Date:  2007-01-13

6.  The human Turing machine: a neural framework for mental programs.

Authors:  Ariel Zylberberg; Stanislas Dehaene; Pieter R Roelfsema; Mariano Sigman
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2011-06-21       Impact factor: 20.229

Review 7.  Neural representations for object perception: structure, category, and adaptive coding.

Authors:  Zoe Kourtzi; Charles E Connor
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 12.449

8.  Performance-optimized hierarchical models predict neural responses in higher visual cortex.

Authors:  Daniel L K Yamins; Ha Hong; Charles F Cadieu; Ethan A Solomon; Darren Seibert; James J DiCarlo
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Amazon's Mechanical Turk: A New Source of Inexpensive, Yet High-Quality, Data?

Authors:  Michael Buhrmester; Tracy Kwang; Samuel D Gosling
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2011-02-03

10.  Evaluating Amazon's Mechanical Turk as a tool for experimental behavioral research.

Authors:  Matthew J C Crump; John V McDonnell; Todd M Gureckis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  22 in total

1.  Minimal videos: Trade-off between spatial and temporal information in human and machine vision.

Authors:  Guy Ben-Yosef; Gabriel Kreiman; Shimon Ullman
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2020-04-20

2.  Image interpretation above and below the object level.

Authors:  Guy Ben-Yosef; Shimon Ullman
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2018-06-15       Impact factor: 3.906

3.  Examining the Coding Strength of Object Identity and Nonidentity Features in Human Occipito-Temporal Cortex and Convolutional Neural Networks.

Authors:  Yaoda Xu; Maryam Vaziri-Pashkam
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Brain-inspired automated visual object discovery and detection.

Authors:  Lichao Chen; Sudhir Singh; Thomas Kailath; Vwani Roychowdhury
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-12-17       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Not-So-CLEVR: learning same-different relations strains feedforward neural networks.

Authors:  Junkyung Kim; Matthew Ricci; Thomas Serre
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2018-06-15       Impact factor: 3.906

Review 6.  If deep learning is the answer, what is the question?

Authors:  Andrew Saxe; Stephanie Nelli; Christopher Summerfield
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2020-11-16       Impact factor: 34.870

7.  Dramatic action: A theater-based paradigm for analyzing human interactions.

Authors:  Yuvalal Liron; Noa Raindel; Uri Alon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-03-08       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Backpropagation and the brain.

Authors:  Timothy P Lillicrap; Adam Santoro; Luke Marris; Colin J Akerman; Geoffrey Hinton
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2020-04-17       Impact factor: 34.870

9.  Performance vs. competence in human-machine comparisons.

Authors:  Chaz Firestone
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-10-13       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Sensitivity to geometric shape regularity in humans and baboons: A putative signature of human singularity.

Authors:  Mathias Sablé-Meyer; Joël Fagot; Serge Caparos; Timo van Kerkoerle; Marie Amalric; Stanislas Dehaene
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-04-20       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.