Sari D Holmes1, Lisa M Fornaresio2, Casey E Miller2, Deborah J Shuman2, Niv Ad2. 1. Cardiac Surgery Research, Inova Heart and Vascular Institute, 3300 Gallows Road, Suite 3100, Falls Church, VA, 22042, USA. Sari.Holmes@inova.org. 2. Cardiac Surgery Research, Inova Heart and Vascular Institute, 3300 Gallows Road, Suite 3100, Falls Church, VA, 22042, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Some variability in recovery and outcomes after cardiac surgery may be influenced by psychosocial aspects not routinely captured. Preliminary evidence suggests patient expectations impact health status, but there is no specific measure of expectations for cardiac surgery. The purpose of this study was to adapt an expectations scale to cardiac surgery and assess the psychometric properties of the scale. METHODS: Before surgery, 93 patients awaiting non-emergent cardiac surgery completed questionnaires, including the adapted Cardiac Surgery Patient Expectations Questionnaire (C-SPEQ). At 1 year after surgery, 68 patients completed questionnaires. RESULTS: Mean C-SPEQ score was 39.4 ± 9.02, and scores were normally distributed (Cronbach's alpha = 0.86). Higher score indicated negative expectations. Higher presurgery C-SPEQ score was correlated with greater depression (r = 0.32, p = 0.01) and perceived stress (r = 0.36, p = 0.003), but not state anxiety (r = 0.18, p = 0.14), at one-year post-surgery. Higher C-SPEQ was associated with longer recovery time (B = 0.14, p = 0.006) and lower physical HRQL after surgery (B = -0.31, p = 0.005). Higher C-SPEQ was not related to greater odds for perioperative complications (OR 1.01, p = 0.68) or readmissions <30 days (OR 1.05, p = 0.31). C-SPEQ score was not related to survival. CONCLUSIONS: Adaptation of an expectations questionnaire to cardiac surgery patients was successful with acceptable reliability and validity. Negative expectations had a detrimental impact on recovery and HRQL following cardiac surgery but were not related to clinical outcomes. Although focus is mainly on improving clinical outcomes, there are opportunities to improve non-clinical aspects of the patient experience. Presurgical education might better prepare patients, reduce negative expectations, and improve psychosocial outcomes after cardiac surgery.
PURPOSE: Some variability in recovery and outcomes after cardiac surgery may be influenced by psychosocial aspects not routinely captured. Preliminary evidence suggests patient expectations impact health status, but there is no specific measure of expectations for cardiac surgery. The purpose of this study was to adapt an expectations scale to cardiac surgery and assess the psychometric properties of the scale. METHODS: Before surgery, 93 patients awaiting non-emergent cardiac surgery completed questionnaires, including the adapted Cardiac Surgery Patient Expectations Questionnaire (C-SPEQ). At 1 year after surgery, 68 patients completed questionnaires. RESULTS: Mean C-SPEQ score was 39.4 ± 9.02, and scores were normally distributed (Cronbach's alpha = 0.86). Higher score indicated negative expectations. Higher presurgery C-SPEQ score was correlated with greater depression (r = 0.32, p = 0.01) and perceived stress (r = 0.36, p = 0.003), but not state anxiety (r = 0.18, p = 0.14), at one-year post-surgery. Higher C-SPEQ was associated with longer recovery time (B = 0.14, p = 0.006) and lower physical HRQL after surgery (B = -0.31, p = 0.005). Higher C-SPEQ was not related to greater odds for perioperative complications (OR 1.01, p = 0.68) or readmissions <30 days (OR 1.05, p = 0.31). C-SPEQ score was not related to survival. CONCLUSIONS: Adaptation of an expectations questionnaire to cardiac surgery patients was successful with acceptable reliability and validity. Negative expectations had a detrimental impact on recovery and HRQL following cardiac surgery but were not related to clinical outcomes. Although focus is mainly on improving clinical outcomes, there are opportunities to improve non-clinical aspects of the patient experience. Presurgical education might better prepare patients, reduce negative expectations, and improve psychosocial outcomes after cardiac surgery.
Authors: Samer A M Nashef; François Roques; Linda D Sharples; Johan Nilsson; Christopher Smith; Antony R Goldstone; Ulf Lockowandt Journal: Eur J Cardiothorac Surg Date: 2012-02-29 Impact factor: 4.191
Authors: Pamela L Hudak; Sheilah Hogg-Johnson; Claire Bombardier; Patricia D McKeever; James G Wright Journal: Med Care Date: 2004-08 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Andrea S Wallace; Brenda Luther; Jia-Wen Guo; Ching-Yu Wang; Shawna Sisler; Bob Wong Journal: Prev Chronic Dis Date: 2020-06-18 Impact factor: 2.830
Authors: D Rosselló Jiménez; M López-Cano; V Rodrigues Gonçalves; M Verdaguer Tremolosa; J Saludes Serra; A Bravo-Salva; J A Pereira Rodríguez Journal: Hernia Date: 2021-10-20 Impact factor: 2.920
Authors: Anuradha Lala; Helena L Chang; Xiaoyu Liu; Eric J Charles; Babatunde A Yerokun; Michael E Bowdish; Vinod H Thourani; Michael J Mack; Marissa A Miller; Patrick T O'Gara; Eugene H Blackstone; Alan J Moskowitz; Annetine C Gelijns; John C Mullen; Lynne W Stevenson Journal: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Date: 2020-03-04 Impact factor: 5.209