| Literature DB >> 26883066 |
Peter Stiers1, Luciana Falbo2, Alexandros Goulas2, Tamara van Gog3, Anique de Bruin4.
Abstract
Monitoring of learning is only accurate at some time after learning. It is thought that immediate monitoring is based on working memory, whereas later monitoring requires re-activation of stored items, yielding accurate judgements. Such interpretations are difficult to test because they require reverse inference, which presupposes specificity of brain activity for the hidden cognitive processes. We investigated whether multivariate pattern classification can provide this specificity. We used a word recall task to create single trial examples of immediate and long term retrieval and trained a learning algorithm to discriminate them. Next, participants performed a similar task involving monitoring instead of recall. The recall-trained classifier recognized the retrieval patterns underlying immediate and long term monitoring and classified delayed monitoring examples as long-term retrieval. This result demonstrates the feasibility of decoding cognitive processes, instead of their content.Entities:
Keywords: Educational psychology; Functional MRI; Judgement of learning; Metacognition; Working memory
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26883066 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.02.008
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Neuroimage ISSN: 1053-8119 Impact factor: 6.556