Literature DB >> 26883010

Reliability and validity of the Lower Limb Function Questionnaire when completed by young adult orthotic and prosthetic device users.

Luke Funk1, Danielle Thiessen1, Virginia Wright2,3, Jan Andrysek2,4, Karen Rispin1.   

Abstract

Purpose The Lower Limb Function Questionnaire (LLFQ) was developed as a self-report assessment of lower-limb functional ability for orthotic and prosthetic (O&P) device users to be suitable for a wide range of conditions, cultures, and ages. The measure aims to address an existing gap in tools for the assessment of functional ability in this population. The purpose of this study is to evaluate LLFQ reliability and validity in a sample of young adult O&P users. Methods Adolescents from a secondary school in Kenya completed the LLFQ twice, 6 d apart, and test-retest reliability was assessed using intra-class correlation coefficients. Validity evaluations involved Timed Up-and-Go, 6-min walk, 6-min obstacle course, and/or spatiotemporal gait assessments. Oxygen consumption was measured during walk tests. Associations between the LLFQ and each measure were evaluated using Pearson correlation coefficients for construct validity. Results LLFQ reliability was acceptable (ICC = 0.79, 95% CIs 0.64-0.89). Construct validity was demonstrated via moderate correlation (r  >  0.60) with obstacle course distance, gait velocity, stride length, and stance/single support/double support percent of gait cycle. Conclusions Both LLFQ reliability and validity were acceptable in the sample of youth in Kenya. Further testing is required to determine applicability in other cultural contexts. Implications for Rehabilitation The LLFQ may be clinically useful across a variety of cultures and conditions to provide feedback on the effectiveness of rehabilitative treatment or assistive devices for youth with lower limb impairments. The LLFQ may enable specific strengths and challenges to lower limb function to be identified to enable planning of well-targeted rehabilitation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  low-resource; orthotics; outcomes measure; prosthetics; questionnaire; test–retest; validity

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26883010     DOI: 10.3109/17483107.2015.1129458

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol        ISSN: 1748-3107


  3 in total

1.  Test-retest reliability and construct validity of the Aspects of Wheelchair Mobility Test as a measure of the mobility of wheelchair users.

Authors:  Karen L Rispin; Kara Huff; Joy Wee
Journal:  Afr J Disabil       Date:  2017-09-08

2.  Discriminatory validity of the Aspects of Wheelchair Mobility Test as demonstrated by a comparison of four wheelchair types designed for use in low-resource areas.

Authors:  Karen L Rispin; Elisa Hamm; Joy Wee
Journal:  Afr J Disabil       Date:  2017-09-08

3.  The client satisfaction with device: a Rasch validation of the Arabic version in patients with upper and lower limb amputation.

Authors:  Hadeel R Bakhsh; Nilüfer Kablan; Walaa Alammar; Yaşar Tatar; Giorgio Ferriero
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2021-04-27       Impact factor: 3.186

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.