Literature DB >> 26882559

Chilling without regrets: Deciphering the effects of cryopreservation on the epigenetic properties of frozen cells will benefit the applications of cryo-technology.

Anamika Chatterjee1, Debapriya Saha1, Birgit Glasmacher1, Nicola Hofmann1.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2016        PMID： 26882559      PMCID： PMC4772988          DOI： 10.15252/embr.201642069

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  EMBO Rep        ISSN： 1469-221X            Impact factor:   8.807


× No keyword cloud information.
  10 in total

Review 1.  Is a review of standard procedures for cryopreservation needed?: safe and effective cryopreservation-should sperm banks and fertility centres move toward storage in nitrogen vapour?

Authors:  M Tomlinson; D Sakkas
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 6.918

2.  Vitrification of pig oocytes induces changes in histone H4 acetylation and histone H3 lysine 9 methylation (H3K9).

Authors:  M Spinaci; C Vallorani; D Bucci; C Tamanini; E Porcu; G Galeati
Journal:  Vet Res Commun       Date:  2012-06-17       Impact factor: 2.459

3.  Routine cryopreservation of spermatozoa is safe--evidence from the DNA methylation pattern of nine spermatozoa genes.

Authors:  Ruth Kläver; Andreas Bleiziffer; Klaus Redmann; Con Mallidis; Sabine Kliesch; Jörg Gromoll
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2012-06-13       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Vitrification versus slow freezing of oocytes: effects on morphologic appearance, meiotic spindle configuration, and DNA damage.

Authors:  Mónica Martínez-Burgos; Leyre Herrero; Diego Megías; Rubén Salvanes; María C Montoya; Ana C Cobo; Juan A Garcia-Velasco
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2010-09-09       Impact factor: 7.329

5.  Embryo vitrification affects the methylation of the H19/Igf2 differentially methylated domain and the expression of H19 and Igf2.

Authors:  Zengyan Wang; Ling Xu; Fangfang He
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2010-04-18       Impact factor: 7.329

6.  Cryopreservation affects the quality of in vitro produced bovine embryos at the molecular level.

Authors:  H Stinshoff; S Wilkening; A Hanstedt; K Brüning; C Wrenzycki
Journal:  Theriogenology       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 2.740

7.  The health risks of ART.

Authors:  Daria Grafodatskaya; Cheryl Cytrynbaum; Rosanna Weksberg
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2013-01-22       Impact factor: 8.807

8.  Dimethyl sulfoxide has an impact on epigenetic profile in mouse embryoid body.

Authors:  Misa Iwatani; Kohta Ikegami; Yuliya Kremenska; Naka Hattori; Satoshi Tanaka; Shintaro Yagi; Kunio Shiota
Journal:  Stem Cells       Date:  2006-07-13       Impact factor: 6.277

9.  Nuclear transfer of sand cat cells into enucleated domestic cat oocytes is affected by cryopreservation of donor cells.

Authors:  Martha C Gómez; C Earle Pope; Robert H Kutner; David M Ricks; Leslie A Lyons; Mark Ruhe; Cherie Dumas; Justine Lyons; Mónica López; Betsy L Dresser; Jakob Reiser
Journal:  Cloning Stem Cells       Date:  2008-12

Review 10.  Epigenetic disorders and altered gene expression after use of Assisted Reproductive Technologies in domestic cattle.

Authors:  Rodrigo Urrego; Nélida Rodriguez-Osorio; Heiner Niemann
Journal:  Epigenetics       Date:  2014-04-23       Impact factor: 4.528
  10 in total
  1 in total

Review 1.  Evolutionary consequences of environmental effects on gamete performance.

Authors:  Angela J Crean; Simone Immler
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2021-04-19       Impact factor: 6.671
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.