Literature DB >> 26882484

Cost-utility of albiglutide versus insulin lispro, insulin glargine, and sitagliptin for the treatment of type 2 diabetes in the US.

David Bruhn1, Alan A Martin2, Ruben Tavares3, Barnaby Hunt4, Richard F Pollock4.   

Abstract

Objective To compare the cost-utility of the glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist albiglutide with those of insulin lispro (both in combination with insulin glargine), insulin glargine, and the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor sitagliptin, representing treatments along the type 2 diabetes treatment continuum. Methods The Centre for Outcomes Research and Effectiveness (CORE) Diabetes Model was used for the cost-utility analysis. Data from three Phase 3 clinical trials (HARMONY 6, HARMONY 4, and HARMONY 3) evaluating albiglutide for the treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes were used for the baseline characteristics and treatment effects. Utilities and costs were derived from published sources. Results Albiglutide treatment was associated with an improvement in mean quality-adjusted life expectancy of 0.099, 0.033, and 0.101 years when compared with insulin lispro, insulin glargine, and sitagliptin, respectively. Over the 50-year time horizon, mean total costs in the albiglutide arm were $4332, $2597, and $2223 more than in the other respective treatments. These costs resulted in an incremental cost-utility ratio of $43,541, $79,166, and $22,094 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained for albiglutide vs insulin lispro, insulin glargine, and sitagliptin, respectively. At a willingness-to-pay threshold of $50,000 per QALY gained, there was a 53.0%, 41.5%, and 67.5% probability of albiglutide being cost-effective compared with the other respective treatments. Limitations This analysis was an extrapolation over a 50-year time horizon based on relatively short-term data obtained during clinical trials. It does not take into account potential differences between the respective treatments in adherence and persistence that can influence both effects and costs. Conclusions Albiglutide represents a reasonable treatment option for patients with type 2 diabetes based on its cost-utility, relative to insulin lispro, insulin glargine, and sitagliptin.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Albiglutide; Cost-utility; Insulin; Type 2 diabetes

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26882484     DOI: 10.3111/13696998.2016.1154567

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Econ        ISSN: 1369-6998            Impact factor:   2.448


  5 in total

1.  The validity of cost-effectiveness analyses of tight glycemic control. A systematic survey of economic evaluations of pharmacological interventions in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Francisco J Barrera; Freddy Jk Toloza; Oscar J Ponce; Jorge A Zuñiga-Hernandez; Larry J Prokop; Nilay D Shah; Gordon Guyatt; Rene Rodriguez-Gutierrez; Victor M Montori
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2020-09-21       Impact factor: 3.633

2.  Cost Effectiveness of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) Inhibitors, Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 (GLP-1) Receptor Agonists, and Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 (DPP-4) Inhibitors: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Dongzhe Hong; Lei Si; Minghuan Jiang; Hui Shao; Wai-Kit Ming; Yingnan Zhao; Yan Li; Lizheng Shi
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  Cost-effectiveness of GLP-1 receptor agonists versus insulin for the treatment of type 2 diabetes: a real-world study and systematic review.

Authors:  Chen-Yi Yang; Ying-Ren Chen; Huang-Tz Ou; Shihchen Kuo
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diabetol       Date:  2021-01-19       Impact factor: 9.951

4.  Meta-analysis of economic evaluation studies: data harmonisation and methodological issues.

Authors:  Bhavani Shankara Bagepally; Usa Chaikledkaew; Nathorn Chaiyakunapruk; John Attia; Ammarin Thakkinstian
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-02-15       Impact factor: 2.655

5.  Glucagon-like peptide 1 agonists for treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes who fail metformin monotherapy: systematic review and meta-analysis of economic evaluation studies.

Authors:  Bhavani Shankara Bagepally; Usa Chaikledkaew; Yogesh Krishnarao Gurav; Thunyarat Anothaisintawee; Sitaporn Youngkong; Nathorn Chaiyakunapruk; Mark McEvoy; John Attia; Ammarin Thakkinstian
Journal:  BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care       Date:  2020-07
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.