RATIONALE: The development of host-targeted, prophylactic, and therapeutic interventions against tuberculosis requires a better understanding of the immune mechanisms that determine the outcome of infection with Mycobacterium tuberculosis. OBJECTIVES: To identify T-cell-dependent mechanisms that are protective in tuberculosis. METHODS: Multicolor flow cytometry, cell sorting and growth inhibition assays were employed to compare the frequency, phenotype and function of T lymphocytes from bronchoalveolar lavage or the peripheral blood. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: At two independent study sites, bronchoalveolar lavage cells from donors with latent tuberculosis infection limited the growth of virulent Mycobacterium tuberculosis more efficiently than those in patients who developed disease. Unconventional, glycolipid-responsive T cells contributed to reduced mycobacterial growth because antibodies to CD1b inhibited this effect by 55%. Lipoarabinomannan was the most potent mycobacterial lipid antigen (activation of 1.3% T lymphocytes) and activated CD1b-restricted T cells that limited bacterial growth. A subset of IFN-γ-producing lipoarabinomannan-responsive T cells coexpressed the cytotoxic molecules perforin, granulysin, and granzyme B, which we termed polycytotoxic T cells. Taking advantage of two well-defined cohorts of subjects latently infected with Mycobacterium tuberculosis or patients who developed active disease after infection, we found a correlation between the frequency of polycytotoxic T cells and the ability to control infection (latent tuberculosis infection, 62%; posttuberculosis patients, 26%). CONCLUSIONS: Our data define an unconventional CD8(+) T-cell subset (polycytotoxic T cells) that is based on antigen recognition and function. The results link clinical and mechanistic evidence that glycolipid-responsive, polycytotoxic T cells contribute to protection against tuberculosis.
RATIONALE: The development of host-targeted, prophylactic, and therapeutic interventions against tuberculosis requires a better understanding of the immune mechanisms that determine the outcome of infection with Mycobacterium tuberculosis. OBJECTIVES: To identify T-cell-dependent mechanisms that are protective in tuberculosis. METHODS: Multicolor flow cytometry, cell sorting and growth inhibition assays were employed to compare the frequency, phenotype and function of T lymphocytes from bronchoalveolar lavage or the peripheral blood. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: At two independent study sites, bronchoalveolar lavage cells from donors with latent tuberculosis infection limited the growth of virulent Mycobacterium tuberculosis more efficiently than those in patients who developed disease. Unconventional, glycolipid-responsive T cells contributed to reduced mycobacterial growth because antibodies to CD1b inhibited this effect by 55%. Lipoarabinomannan was the most potent mycobacterial lipid antigen (activation of 1.3% T lymphocytes) and activated CD1b-restricted T cells that limited bacterial growth. A subset of IFN-γ-producing lipoarabinomannan-responsive T cells coexpressed the cytotoxic molecules perforin, granulysin, and granzyme B, which we termed polycytotoxic T cells. Taking advantage of two well-defined cohorts of subjects latently infected with Mycobacterium tuberculosis or patients who developed active disease after infection, we found a correlation between the frequency of polycytotoxic T cells and the ability to control infection (latent tuberculosis infection, 62%; posttuberculosis patients, 26%). CONCLUSIONS: Our data define an unconventional CD8(+) T-cell subset (polycytotoxic T cells) that is based on antigen recognition and function. The results link clinical and mechanistic evidence that glycolipid-responsive, polycytotoxic T cells contribute to protection against tuberculosis.
Entities:
Keywords:
cytotoxicity; glycolipid antigens; infectious immunology; unconventional T cells
Authors: J P Rosat; E P Grant; E M Beckman; C C Dascher; P A Sieling; D Frederique; R L Modlin; S A Porcelli; S T Furlong; M B Brenner Journal: J Immunol Date: 1999-01-01 Impact factor: 5.422
Authors: Sayma Rahman; Isabelle Magalhaes; Jubayer Rahman; Raija K Ahmed; Donata R Sizemore; Charles A Scanga; Frank Weichold; Frank Verreck; Ivanela Kondova; Jerry Sadoff; Rigmor Thorstensson; Mats Spångberg; Mattias Svensson; Jan Andersson; Markus Maeurer; Susanna Brighenti Journal: Mol Med Date: 2012-05-09 Impact factor: 6.354
Authors: W A Ernst; S Thoma-Uszynski; R Teitelbaum; C Ko; D A Hanson; C Clayberger; A M Krensky; M Leippe; B R Bloom; T Ganz; R L Modlin Journal: J Immunol Date: 2000-12-15 Impact factor: 5.422
Authors: S Cho; V Mehra; S Thoma-Uszynski; S Stenger; N Serbina; R J Mazzaccaro; J L Flynn; P F Barnes; S Southwood; E Celis; B R Bloom; R L Modlin; A Sette Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2000-10-24 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: P A Sieling; D Chatterjee; S A Porcelli; T I Prigozy; R J Mazzaccaro; T Soriano; B R Bloom; M B Brenner; M Kronenberg; P J Brennan Journal: Science Date: 1995-07-14 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: U Mack; G B Migliori; M Sester; H L Rieder; S Ehlers; D Goletti; A Bossink; K Magdorf; C Hölscher; B Kampmann; S M Arend; A Detjen; G Bothamley; J P Zellweger; H Milburn; R Diel; P Ravn; F Cobelens; P J Cardona; B Kan; I Solovic; R Duarte; D M Cirillo Journal: Eur Respir J Date: 2009-05 Impact factor: 16.671
Authors: Samuel J Balin; Matteo Pellegrini; Eynav Klechevsky; Sohui T Won; David I Weiss; Aaron W Choi; Joshua Hakimian; Jing Lu; Maria Teresa Ochoa; Barry R Bloom; Lewis L Lanier; Steffen Stenger; Robert L Modlin Journal: Sci Immunol Date: 2018-08-31
Authors: Rosa Sottile; M Kazim Panjwani; Colleen M Lau; Anthony F Daniyan; Kento Tanaka; Juliet N Barker; Renier J Brentjens; Joseph C Sun; Jean-Benoît Le Luduec; Katharine C Hsu Journal: Sci Immunol Date: 2021-09-24
Authors: Gema Méndez-Lagares; Ning Chin; W L William Chang; Jaewon Lee; Míriam Rosás-Umbert; Hung T Kieu; David Merriam; Wenze Lu; Sungjin Kim; Lourdes Adamson; Christian Brander; Paul A Luciw; Peter A Barry; Dennis J Hartigan-O'Connor Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2021-08-02 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: Andrew R DiNardo; Tomoki Nishiguchi; Sandra L Grimm; Larry S Schlesinger; Edward A Graviss; Jeffrey D Cirillo; Cristian Coarfa; Anna M Mandalakas; Jan Heyckendorf; Stefan H E Kaufmann; Christoph Lange; Mihai G Netea; Reinout Van Crevel Journal: Med (N Y) Date: 2021-01-16
Authors: Charlotte A James; Krystle K Q Yu; Martine Gilleron; Jacques Prandi; Vijayendar R Yedulla; Zuzanna Z Moleda; Eleonora Diamanti; Momin Khan; Varinder K Aggarwal; Josephine F Reijneveld; Peter Reinink; Stefanie Lenz; Ryan O Emerson; Thomas J Scriba; Michael N T Souter; Dale I Godfrey; Daniel G Pellicci; D Branch Moody; Adriaan J Minnaard; Chetan Seshadri; Ildiko Van Rhijn Journal: Cell Chem Biol Date: 2018-02-01 Impact factor: 8.116
Authors: Andrew Chancellor; Anna S Tocheva; Chris Cave-Ayland; Liku Tezera; Andrew White; Juma'a R Al Dulayymi; John S Bridgeman; Ivo Tews; Susan Wilson; Nikolai M Lissin; Marc Tebruegge; Ben Marshall; Sally Sharpe; Tim Elliott; Chris-Kriton Skylaris; Jonathan W Essex; Mark S Baird; Stephan Gadola; Paul Elkington; Salah Mansour Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2017-11-20 Impact factor: 11.205