Leisha A Emens1, Marleen Kok, Laureen S Ojalvo. 1. aDepartment of Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA bThe Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands cThe Kelly Gynecologic Oncology Service, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Immune checkpoint blockade is changing cancer therapy. Targeting the programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) pathway releases T cells from inhibitory signals within the tumor microenvironment, thereby activating a latent antitumor immune response. Here, we review the biology underlying the activity of PD-1/programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) antagonists, and data describing their clinical activity in breast and ovarian cancer. RECENT FINDINGS: Several antagonists of PD-1 and PD-L1 have been tested in breast and ovarian cancer. These drugs are generally well tolerated, with some immune-related adverse events that are typically easily managed. Objective response rates generally range from about 10 to 20% in both breast cancer and ovarian cancer, with durable responses noted in multiple trials. Selecting patients with PD-L1 expression by cells within the tumor microenvironment appears to enrich for responses. These agents are under accelerated development based on these promising early data. SUMMARY: Monoclonal antibody-based blockade of the PD-1 pathway results in objective and durable clinical responses in a subset of patients with breast or ovarian cancers, particularly those with PD-L1-positive cells within the tumor microenvironment. Current priorities are to refine biomarkers of therapeutic response, and to develop combination immunotherapy strategies that integrate PD-1/PD-L1 antagonists with both standard and immune-based cancer therapies to increase efficacy.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Immune checkpoint blockade is changing cancer therapy. Targeting the programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) pathway releases T cells from inhibitory signals within the tumor microenvironment, thereby activating a latent antitumor immune response. Here, we review the biology underlying the activity of PD-1/programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) antagonists, and data describing their clinical activity in breast and ovarian cancer. RECENT FINDINGS: Several antagonists of PD-1 and PD-L1 have been tested in breast and ovarian cancer. These drugs are generally well tolerated, with some immune-related adverse events that are typically easily managed. Objective response rates generally range from about 10 to 20% in both breast cancer and ovarian cancer, with durable responses noted in multiple trials. Selecting patients with PD-L1 expression by cells within the tumor microenvironment appears to enrich for responses. These agents are under accelerated development based on these promising early data. SUMMARY: Monoclonal antibody-based blockade of the PD-1 pathway results in objective and durable clinical responses in a subset of patients with breast or ovarian cancers, particularly those with PD-L1-positive cells within the tumor microenvironment. Current priorities are to refine biomarkers of therapeutic response, and to develop combination immunotherapy strategies that integrate PD-1/PD-L1 antagonists with both standard and immune-based cancer therapies to increase efficacy.
Authors: Marcelo Sobral-Leite; Koen Van de Vijver; Magali Michaut; Rianne van der Linden; Gerrit K J Hooijer; Hugo M Horlings; Tesa M Severson; Anna Marie Mulligan; Nayana Weerasooriya; Joyce Sanders; Annuska M Glas; Diederik Wehkamp; Lorenza Mittempergher; Kelly Kersten; Ashley Cimino-Mathews; Dennis Peters; Erik Hooijberg; Annegien Broeks; Marc J van de Vijver; Rene Bernards; Irene L Andrulis; Marleen Kok; Karin E de Visser; Marjanka K Schmidt Journal: Oncoimmunology Date: 2018-09-11 Impact factor: 8.110
Authors: Takako Okamoto; Syn Kok Yeo; Mingang Hao; Mary Rose Copley; Michael A Haas; Song Chen; Jun-Lin Guan Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2020-06-24 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: David J Messenheimer; Shawn M Jensen; Michael E Afentoulis; Keith W Wegmann; Zipei Feng; David J Friedman; Michael J Gough; Walter J Urba; Bernard A Fox Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2017-08-28 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Carlo Fremd; Mario Hlevnjak; Marc Zapatka; Inka Zoernig; Niels Halama; Nino Fejzibegovic; Verena Thewes; Peter Lichter; Peter Schirmacher; Matthias Kloor; Frederik Marmé; Florian Schütz; Zeynep Kosaloglu; Hans Peter Sinn; Dirk Jäger; Andreas Schneeweiss Journal: Breast Care (Basel) Date: 2018-11-14 Impact factor: 2.860