Scott A Baldwin1, Gilbert W Fellingham2, Austin S Baldwin3. 1. Department of Psychology, Brigham Young University. 2. Department of Statistics, Brigham Young University. 3. Department of Psychology, Southern Methodist University.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Researchers who study physical activity often use outcome variables that have a lower bound of zero and are positively skewed (e.g., minutes of physical activity in a day). Researchers also often use statistical methods that assume the outcome is normally distributed or transform the outcome as an attempt to make it more normal, both of which can be problematic. In this article, the authors describe multilevel 2-part models that use a mixture of logistic regression-to predict whether a person was active-and gamma regression-to predict amount of activity if there was activity. METHOD: The authors contrast the 2-part models to a linear multilevel model using data from a longitudinal study of physical activity (N = 113; 2,305 observations). The dependent variable was minutes of moderate-to-vigorous activity in a day and the predictor variables were day, satisfaction, and gender. RESULTS: The 2-part models outperform the linear model and provide researchers critical information that is conceptually relevant, such as distinguishing between predictors of whether activity occurred and of how much activity occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Two-part models represent a flexible and useful addition to the analysis repertoire of health researchers. To assist researchers in learning these methods, the online supplemental materials provide additional technical information as well as annotated computer code for estimating these models. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved).
OBJECTIVE: Researchers who study physical activity often use outcome variables that have a lower bound of zero and are positively skewed (e.g., minutes of physical activity in a day). Researchers also often use statistical methods that assume the outcome is normally distributed or transform the outcome as an attempt to make it more normal, both of which can be problematic. In this article, the authors describe multilevel 2-part models that use a mixture of logistic regression-to predict whether a person was active-and gamma regression-to predict amount of activity if there was activity. METHOD: The authors contrast the 2-part models to a linear multilevel model using data from a longitudinal study of physical activity (N = 113; 2,305 observations). The dependent variable was minutes of moderate-to-vigorous activity in a day and the predictor variables were day, satisfaction, and gender. RESULTS: The 2-part models outperform the linear model and provide researchers critical information that is conceptually relevant, such as distinguishing between predictors of whether activity occurred and of how much activity occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Two-part models represent a flexible and useful addition to the analysis repertoire of health researchers. To assist researchers in learning these methods, the online supplemental materials provide additional technical information as well as annotated computer code for estimating these models. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved).
Authors: Cheng K Fred Wen; Yue Liao; Jaclyn P Maher; Jimi Huh; Britni R Belcher; Eldin Dzubur; Genevieve F Dunton Journal: Health Psychol Date: 2018-10 Impact factor: 4.267
Authors: Gregory Knell; Casey P Durand; Kerem Shuval; Harold W Kohl; Deborah Salvo; Abiodun Olyuomi; Kelley Pettee Gabriel Journal: Transl J Am Coll Sports Med Date: 2018-05
Authors: Xiaonan Xue; Qibin Qi; Daniela Sotres-Alvarez; Scott C Roesch; Maria M Llabre; Sierra A Bainter; Yasmin Mossavar-Rahmani; Robert Kaplan; Tao Wang Journal: Stat Med Date: 2020-09-18 Impact factor: 2.373
Authors: Rachel Margaret Carr; Eleanor Quested; Andreas Stenling; Cecilie Thøgersen-Ntoumani; Andrew Prestwich; Daniel Frank Gucciardi; Joanne McVeigh; Nikos Ntoumanis Journal: Health Psychol Behav Med Date: 2021-04-07
Authors: Danielle R Madden; Chun Nok Lam; Brian Redline; Eldin Dzubur; Harmony Rhoades; Stephen S Intille; Genevieve F Dunton; Benjamin Henwood Journal: J Sport Exerc Psychol Date: 2020-10-06 Impact factor: 3.016