| Literature DB >> 26881259 |
Shichun Du1, Xia Yang2, Degang Shi2, Qing Su1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The study provided data to demonstrate the characteristics of type 2 diabetes (T2D) with ketosis in rural parts of south-west border of China in order to help health professionals with optimizing diabetic care.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26881259 PMCID: PMC4736950 DOI: 10.1155/2016/7854294
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Diabetes Res Impact factor: 4.011
Anthropometric and biochemical characteristics of participants.
| T2DK | T1D | T2D |
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Subjects (%total) | 371 (12%) | 104 (3%) | 2654 (85%) | — | — |
| Age (yr) | 49 ± 13 | 26 ± 14 | 47 ± 14 | <0.0001 | 0.85 |
| Gender (male %) | 66 | 44 | 48 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 |
| Family history (%) | 35 | 11 | 37 | 0.03 | 0.89 |
| Height (cm) | 162 ± 9 | 150 ± 11 | 158 ± 8 | 0.04 | 0.23 |
| Weight (kg) | 64.6 ± 14 | 45.3 ± 9.7 | 57.4 ± 11 | <0.0001 | 0.21 |
| Body mass index (kg/m2) | 25 ± 4 | 19 ± 3 | 23 ± 3 | <0.0001 | 0.76 |
| Overweight or obese (%) | 49.1 | 11.7 | 43.5 | <0.0001 | 0.62 |
| Systolic pressure (mmHg) | 120 ± 21 | 123 ± 28 | 120 ± 27 | 0.41 | 0.87 |
| Diastolic pressure (mmHg) | 79 ± 12 | 77 ± 18 | 80 ± 14 | 0.83 | 0.92 |
| Fasting glucose (mmol/L) | 16.9 ± 6 | 20.1 ± 6 | 10.3 ± 4 | 0.0003 | <0.0001 |
| Postprandial 2-hour glucose (mmol/L) | 24.1 ± 7 | 30.2 ± 7 | 18.4 ± 6 | 0.0002 | 0.0001 |
| Fasting C-peptide (nmol/L) | 0.65 ± 0.2 | 0.47 ± 0.1 | 0.98 ± 0.9 | 0.11 | 0.08 |
| Postprandial 2-hour C-peptide (nmol/L) | 2.04 ± 0.8 | 0.69 ± 0.1 | 2.18 ± 1.0 | 0.001 | 0.75 |
| Hemoglobin A1c (%) | 13.3 ± 3.1 | 14.1 ± 4.7 | 10.2 ± 2.1 | 0.43 | 0.01 |
| Fructosamine (mmo/L) | 3.82 ± 0.8 | 3.79 ± 0.9 | 3.14 ± 0.7 | 0.91 | 0.08 |
| Ketoacidosis (%) | 12.1 | 65.4 | — | <0.0001 | — |
| Total cholesterol (mmo/L) | 5.3 ± 1.7 | 5.7 ± 1.7 | 4.9 ± 1.6 | 0.48 | 0.11 |
| Triglyceride (mmo/L) | 4.0 ± 4.0 | 4.3 ± 3.0 | 2.8 ± 2.7 | 0.47 | <0.0001 |
| Serum creatinine ( | 85.6 ± 34.1 | 77.1 ± 38.5 | 80.2 ± 38 | 0.73 | 0.83 |
T2DK, type 2 diabetes with ketosis; T1D, type 1 diabetes; T2D, type 2 diabetes; P1, T2DK versus T1D; P2, T2DK versus T2D.
Comparison of new-onset and old diagnosed diabetes.
| T2DK | T1D | T2D |
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||
| New-onset (months) | 1.73 ± 2.5 | 0.67 ± 0.5 | 2.1 ± 3.2 | <0.0001 | 0.75 |
| Old diagnosed (years) | 6.3 ± 5.3 | 4.4 ± 6.2 | 10.1 ± 9.0 | 0.73 | 0.02 |
|
| |||||
| New-onset | 13.8 | 5.0 | — | 0.01 | — |
| Old diagnosed | 38.7 | 20.0 | — | 0.02 | — |
|
| |||||
| New-onset | 7.3 ± 4.4 | 2.1 ± 2.3 | 4.5 ± 5.3 | 0.02 | 0.04 |
| Old diagnosed | 9.2 ± 6.3 | 15.2 ± 7.2 | 10.4 ± 6.1 | 0.0014 | 0.79 |
T2DK, type 2 diabetes with ketosis; T1D, type 1 diabetes; T2D, type 2 diabetes; P1, T2DK versus T1D; P2, T2DK versus T2D.
Figure 1Inducements in type 2 diabetes with ketosis.
Figure 2Chronic complications of diabetes. T2DK, type 2 diabetes with ketosis; T1D, type 1 diabetes; T2D, type 2 diabetes. P < 0.05, T2DK versus T1D; # P < 0.05, T2DK versus T2D.