| Literature DB >> 26880300 |
Yichang Liu1, Renato Hohl Orsi2, Kathryn Jean Boor3, Martin Wiedmann4, Veronica Guariglia-Oropeza5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Alternative σ factors are important transcriptional regulators in bacteria. While σ(B) has been shown to control a large regulon and play important roles in stress response and virulence in the pathogen Listeria monocytogenes, the function of σ(H) has not yet been well defined in Listeria, even though σ(H) controls a large regulon in the closely related non-pathogenic Bacillus subtilis.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26880300 PMCID: PMC4754846 DOI: 10.1186/s12864-016-2432-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Genomics ISSN: 1471-2164 Impact factor: 3.969
Fig. 1Schematic of σH-dependent transcriptional units identified here. a LMRG_00908-dnaG-rpoD operon; b comEABC operon; c coiA, d lytG; e comGABCDEFG operon; f LMRG_01010-LMRG_01005 operon. Lines show average RNAseq coverage for a sliding window of 100 nt. Blue lines indicate RNA-seq coverage for the three replicates experiments with the 10403S::ΔBCHL P -sigH strain (which over expresses sigH), while green lines indicate RNA-seq coverage for the three replicates experiments with the 10403S::ΔBCHL P strain (which does not contain sigH). Maximum average coverages are shown on the left side of each panel. Black arrows indicate the direction in which the RNA-seq reads were mapped to the chromosome. Genes significantly differentially expressed by the standard approach are labeled with a * next to the gene name. Position of significant fragments is shown as dotted lines underneath the genes with their maximum sliding window fold change shown underneath. Stem loop symbols indicate transcriptional terminators. Genes colored in gray are part of the operons found to be significantly differentially expressed by the sliding window approach and are drawn to scale. Genes colored in magenta are not part of the significant operon and are not drawn to scale. Promoters are indicated by stemmed arrows. A window size of 100 nt was used for the smoothing method. Values on the graph represent the center of these 100 nt windows
Results of Sliding Window approach for identification of differentially expressed fragments regulated by σH
| Transcriptional Unit | Genes (strand) | Other genes in the same operon | Number of fragmentsa | σH -dependent promoter (distance from closest gene) | Identified as differentially expressed by standard approachb |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
| – | 1 | No | No |
| 2 |
|
| 4 | Yes (19 nt) | No |
| 3 |
| – | 5 | Yes (151 nt) |
|
| 4 |
|
| 7 | Yes (22 nt) |
|
| 5 |
|
| 1 | No | No |
| 6 |
|
| 1 | Yes (277 nt) | No |
| 7 |
| – | 1 | Yes (81 nt) |
|
| 8 |
| – | 2 | Yes (220 nt) |
|
| 9 |
|
| 1 | No | No |
a Each fragment is composed of one or more 51 nt overlapping windows
bThis indicates which genes were identified as differentially transcribed with the analysis approach that calculated the normalized RNA-seq coverage for the complete gene (rather than sliding windows) (for full results see Additional file 1: Table S1)
Fig. 2Sequence logos for σH-dependent promoters. a Sequence logos for the six σH-dependent promoters found in this study based on alignment of 24 L. monocytogenes strains. −35 and −10 regions are shown. b Sequence logo of the consensus sequence of σH-dependent promoters based on alignment of sequences from [9]
σH promoter sequences for the σH-dependent operons identified in this study
| Promoters |
|
|
|
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lineage I | Lineage II | Lineage III | |||||
|
| |||||||
| -35 signal | AAAGGATTT | AAAGGATTT | AAAGGATTT | AAAGGATTT | NFc | AAAGGATTT | GAAGGATTT |
| -10 signal | GAGGAAT | GAAGAAT | GAAGAAT | GTAGAAT | NF | GCAGAAT | GCAGAAT |
|
| |||||||
| -35 signal | GAAGGACTT | GAAGGACTT | GAAGGACTT | GAAGGACTT | GAAGGACTT | GAAGGACTT | GAAGGACTT |
| -10 signal | GGCGAAT | GGCGAAT | GGCGAAT | GGCGAAT | GTCGAAT | GTCGAAT | GTCGAAT |
|
| |||||||
| -35 signal | AAAGGAATT | AAAGGATTT | AAAGG(G/A)TTT a | AAAGGAATT | NF | NF | AGAGGATTA |
| -10 signal | GGCGAAT | GGCGAAT | GGCGAAT | GGCGAAT | NF | NF | GGCGAAT |
|
| |||||||
| -35 signal | AGAGGATTA | AGAGGATTA | AGAGGATTA | AGAGGATTA | AGAGGATTA | AGAGGATTA | AGAGGATTA |
| -10 signal | GGCGAAT | GGCGAAT | GGCGAAT | GGCGAAT | GGCGAAT | CGCGAAT | GGCGAAT |
|
| |||||||
| -35 signal | AAAGGAATT | AAAGGAATT | AAAGGAATT | NF | NF | NF | NF |
| -10 signal | GGCGAAT | GGCGAAT | GGCGAAT | NF | NF | NF | NF |
|
| |||||||
| -35 signal | GAAGGAAAT | GAAGGAAAT | GAAGGAAAT | NF | NF | NF | NF |
| -10 signal | G(G/A)AGAAT b | GGAGAAT | GAAGAAT | NF | NF | NF | NF |
aAll L. monocytogenes lineage III serotype 4a strains show the sequence AAAGGGTTT, while one lineage III serotype 4c strain shows the sequence AAAGGATTT
bTwo L. monocytogenes lineage I strain (i.e., SLCC2540 and L312) show the sequence GGAGAAT, while all other lineage I strains show the sequence GAAGAAT
c NF: Not found
Conservation of identified σH-dependent promoters across Listeria monocytogenes genomes
| Gene | N° of polymorphic sites within −35 and −10 signal (out of 16 nt total) | N° of polymorphic sites between −35 and −10 signal (out of 11 nt total) | Probabilitya |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 1 (6 %) | 3 (27 %) | 0.0084 |
|
| 0 (0 %) | 3 (27 %) | 0.0061 |
|
| 2 (13 %) | 4 (36 %) | 0.0014 |
|
| 0 (0.00 %) | 0 (0 %) | 1.000 |
|
| 0 (0.00 %) | 4 (36 %) | 0.0007 |
|
| 1 (6 %) | 4 (36 %) | 0.0011 |
aProbability of finding only as many polymorphic sites in the −35 and −10 sequences combined given the polymorphism frequency in between −35 and −10 signals for the same promoter; a significant probability (<0.05) provides evidence for higher conservation of the promoter regions than expected based on the conservation observed for the region between the −10 and the −35 region
Fig. 3Alignment of σH-dependent promoters found in Listeria species. L. monocytogenes strains 10403S (lineage II), F2365 (lineage I) and HCC23 (lineage III) are used for comparison. −35 and −10 regions are shown