Literature DB >> 26880279

Local adaptation to osmotic environment in killifish, Fundulus heteroclitus, is supported by divergence in swimming performance but not by differences in excess post-exercise oxygen consumption or aerobic scope.

Reid S Brennan1, Ruth Hwang2, Michelle Tse2, Nann A Fangue3, Andrew Whitehead4.   

Abstract

Regulation of internal ion homeostasis is essential for fishes inhabiting environments where salinities differ from their internal concentrations. It is hypothesized that selection will reduce energetic costs of osmoregulation in a population's native osmotic habitat, producing patterns of local adaptation. Killifish, Fundulus heteroclitus, occupy estuarine habitats where salinities range from fresh to seawater. Populations inhabiting an environmental salinity gradient differ in physiological traits associated with acclimation to acute salinity stress, consistent with local adaptation. Similarly, metabolic rates differ in populations adapted to different temperatures, but have not been studied in regard to salinity. We investigated evidence for local adaptation between populations of killifish native to fresh and brackish water habitats. Aerobic scope (the difference between minimum and maximum metabolic rates), excess post-exercise oxygen consumption, and swimming performance (time and distance to reach exhaustion) were used as proxies for fitness in fresh and brackish water treatments. Swimming performance results supported local adaptation; fish native to brackish water habitats performed significantly better than freshwater-native fish at high salinity while low salinity performance was similar between populations. However, results from metabolic measures did not support this conclusion; both populations showed an increase in resting metabolic rate and a decrease of aerobic scope in fresh water. Similarly, excess post-exercise oxygen consumption was higher for both populations in fresh than in brackish water. While swimming results suggest that environmentally dependent performance differences may be a result of selection in divergent osmotic environments, the differences between populations are not coupled with divergence in metabolic performance.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aerobic scope; Excess post-exercise oxygen consumption; Fundulus heteroclitus; Local adaptation; Osmoregulation; Salinity

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26880279     DOI: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2016.02.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol        ISSN: 1095-6433            Impact factor:   2.320


  5 in total

1.  Temperature effects on performance and physiology of two prairie stream minnows.

Authors:  Bryan D Frenette; Lindsey A Bruckerhoff; Michael Tobler; Keith B Gido
Journal:  Conserv Physiol       Date:  2019-10-31       Impact factor: 3.079

2.  Evaluating local adaptation of a complex phenotype: reciprocal tests of pigmy rattlesnake venoms on treefrog prey.

Authors:  Sarah A Smiley-Walters; Terence M Farrell; H Lisle Gibbs
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Intra-Specific Difference in the Effect of Salinity on Physiological Performance in European Perch (Perca fluviatilis) and Its Ecological Importance for Fish in Estuaries.

Authors:  Emil A F Christensen; John D Stieglitz; Martin Grosell; John F Steffensen
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2019-11-17

4.  Genomic investigations provide insights into the mechanisms of resilience to heterogeneous habitats of the Indian Ocean in a pelagic fish.

Authors:  Wilson Sebastian; Sandhya Sukumaran; S Abdul Azeez; K R Muraleedharan; P K Dinesh Kumar; P U Zacharia; A Gopalakrishnan
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-10-19       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Morphological differences between habitats are associated with physiological and behavioural trade-offs in stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus).

Authors:  Frank Seebacher; Mike M Webster; Rob S James; Jason Tallis; Ashley J W Ward
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 2.963

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.