Literature DB >> 26880017

Margins in breast conserving surgery: A practice-changing process.

I T Rubio1, M Ahmed2, T Kovacs3, V Marco4.   

Abstract

Margins in breast conserving surgery (BCS) have been a long standing subject debate. This largely arises from the absence of a consensus on what constitutes an adequate margin width, resulting in re-excision rates of 25-40% for close or positive margins and its consequent impact upon cosmesis, economic costs, patient dissatisfaction and lack of bearing on survival. Accepting that the increased risk of local recurrences (LR) has its influence on survival, the decrease in LR in BCS in the last decade have been motivated by better surgical techniques for assessing negative margins, use of targeted therapies and in general with the multimodal treatment in the management of breast cancer patients. Since the publication of the consensus guidelines on margins there has evolved a trend of changing attitudes towards re-excision. Surgeons are considering margins in the context of all factors including not only patient and tumor characteristics but also the regional and systemic treatment the patient is receiving.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer; Breast conserving surgery; Margins

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26880017     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2016.01.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol        ISSN: 0748-7983            Impact factor:   4.424


  4 in total

1.  Intraoperative ultrasound guided breast surgery: paving the way for personalized surgery.

Authors:  Martin Espinosa-Bravo; Isabel T Rubio
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2016-06

2.  The Margins' Challenge: Risk Factors of Residual Disease After Breast Conserving Surgery in Early-stage Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Piero Fregatti; Marco Gipponi; Giulia Atzori; Raffaele DE Rosa; Raquel Diaz; Chiara Cornacchia; Marco Sparavigna; Alessandro Garlaschi; Liliana Belgioia; Alessandra Fozza; Francesca Pitto; Luca Boni; Eva Blondeaux; Francesca Depaoli; Federica Murelli; Simonetta Franchelli; Gabriele Zoppoli; Matteo Lambertini; Daniele Friedman
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2022 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.155

Review 3.  Cavity Shaving plus Lumpectomy versus Lumpectomy Alone for Patients with Breast Cancer Undergoing Breast-Conserving Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Ke Wang; Yu Ren; Jianjun He
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-03       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  The Importance of the Pathological Perspective in the Management of the Invasive Lobular Carcinoma.

Authors:  Funda Tasli; Demet Cavdar; Sibel Demir Kececi; Baha Zengel; Zehra Hilal Adibelli; Gamze Dal; Irem Gonen; Ozden Oz; Cengiz Yilmaz; Ozlem Ozdemir; Hulya Mollamehmetoglu; Ismail Dilek; Enver Ilhan; Adam Uslu
Journal:  Breast J       Date:  2022-09-26       Impact factor: 2.269

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.