Christine A Motzkus1,2, Roger Luckmann1,2. 1. 1 Clinical and Population Health Research Program, Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA. 2. 2 Department of Family Medicine, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Sepsis treatment protocols emphasize source control with empiric antibiotics and fluid resuscitation. Previous reviews have examined the impact of infection site and specific pathogens on mortality from sepsis; however, no recent review has addressed the infection site. This review focuses on the impact of infection site on hospital mortality among patients with sepsis. METHODS: The PubMed database was searched for articles from 2001 to 2014. Studies were eligible if they included (1) one or more statistical models with hospital mortality as the outcome and considered infection site for inclusion in the model and (2) adult patients with sepsis, severe sepsis, or septic shock. Data abstracted included stage of sepsis, infection site, and raw and adjusted effect estimates. Nineteen studies were included. Infection sites most studied included respiratory (n = 19), abdominal (n = 19), genitourinary (n = 18), and skin and soft tissue infections (n = 11). Several studies found a statistically significant lower mortality risk for genitourinary infections on hospital mortality when compared to respiratory infections. CONCLUSION: Based on studies included in this review, the impact of infection site in patients with sepsis on hospital mortality could not be reliably estimated. Misclassification among infections and disease states remains a serious possibility in studies on this topic.
PURPOSE:Sepsis treatment protocols emphasize source control with empiric antibiotics and fluid resuscitation. Previous reviews have examined the impact of infection site and specific pathogens on mortality from sepsis; however, no recent review has addressed the infection site. This review focuses on the impact of infection site on hospital mortality among patients with sepsis. METHODS: The PubMed database was searched for articles from 2001 to 2014. Studies were eligible if they included (1) one or more statistical models with hospital mortality as the outcome and considered infection site for inclusion in the model and (2) adult patients with sepsis, severe sepsis, or septic shock. Data abstracted included stage of sepsis, infection site, and raw and adjusted effect estimates. Nineteen studies were included. Infection sites most studied included respiratory (n = 19), abdominal (n = 19), genitourinary (n = 18), and skin and soft tissue infections (n = 11). Several studies found a statistically significant lower mortality risk for genitourinary infections on hospital mortality when compared to respiratory infections. CONCLUSION: Based on studies included in this review, the impact of infection site in patients with sepsis on hospital mortality could not be reliably estimated. Misclassification among infections and disease states remains a serious possibility in studies on this topic.
Authors: Julie A Stortz; Michael C Cox; Russell B Hawkins; Gabriela L Ghita; Babette A Brumback; Alicia M Mohr; Lyle L Moldawer; Philip A Efron; Scott C Brakenridge; Frederick A Moore Journal: Crit Care Date: 2020-05-07 Impact factor: 9.097
Authors: Hessel Peters-Sengers; Joe M Butler; Fabrice Uhel; Marcus J Schultz; Marc J Bonten; Olaf L Cremer; Brendon P Scicluna; Lonneke A van Vught; Tom van der Poll Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2021-12-13 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Katryn Paquette; David Sweet; Robert Stenstrom; Sarah N Stabler; Alexander Lawandi; Murtaza Akhter; Adam C Davidson; Marko Gavric; Rehman Jinah; Zahid Saeed; Koray Demir; Sassan Sangsari; Kelly Huang; Amirali Mahpour; Chris Shamatutu; Chelsea Caya; Jean-Marc Troquet; Greg Clark; Titus Wong; Cedric P Yansouni; Matthew P Cheng Journal: Open Forum Infect Dis Date: 2021-06-17 Impact factor: 3.835