Meagan E Stabler1, D Leann Long2, Ilana R A Chertok3, Peter R Giacobbi4, Courtney Pilkerton1, Laura R Lander5. 1. Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia. 2. Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia. 3. School of Nursing, College of Health and Human Services, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, North Carolina. 4. Department of Sport Sciences with Joint Appointment to Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia. 5. Department of Behavioral Medicine and Psychiatry, School of Medicine, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The opioid epidemic is a public health threat with consequences affecting newborns. Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome (NAS) is a constellation of withdrawal symptoms resulting primarily from in utero opioid exposure. The purpose of this study was to examine NAS and drug-specific trends in West Virginia (WV), where rurality-related issues are largely present. METHODS: The 2007-2013 WV Health Care Authority, Uniform Billing Data were analyzed for 119,605 newborn admissions with 1,974 NAS diagnoses. NAS (ICD9-CM 779.5) and exposure diagnostic codes for opioids, hallucinogens, and cocaine were utilized as incidence rate (IR) per 1,000 live births. FINDINGS: Between 2007 and 2013, NAS IR significantly increased from 7.74 to 31.56 per 1,000 live births per year (Z: -19.10, P < .0001). During this time period, opioid exposure increased (Z: -9.56, P < .0001), while cocaine exposure decreased (Z: 3.62, P = .0003). In 2013, the southeastern region of the state had the highest NAS IR of 48.76 per 1,000 live births. NAS infants were more likely to experience other clinical conditions, longer hospital stay, and be insured by Medicaid. CONCLUSIONS: Statewide NAS IR increased 4-fold over the study period, with rates over 3 times the national annual averages. This alarming trend is deleterious for the health of WV mother-child dyads and it strains the state's health care system. Therefore, WV has a unique need for prenatal public health drug treatment and prevention resources, specifically targeting the southeastern region. Further examination of maternal drug-specific trends and general underutilization of neonatal exposure ICD-9-CM codes is indicated.
PURPOSE: The opioid epidemic is a public health threat with consequences affecting newborns. Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome (NAS) is a constellation of withdrawal symptoms resulting primarily from in utero opioid exposure. The purpose of this study was to examine NAS and drug-specific trends in West Virginia (WV), where rurality-related issues are largely present. METHODS: The 2007-2013 WV Health Care Authority, Uniform Billing Data were analyzed for 119,605 newborn admissions with 1,974 NAS diagnoses. NAS (ICD9-CM 779.5) and exposure diagnostic codes for opioids, hallucinogens, and cocaine were utilized as incidence rate (IR) per 1,000 live births. FINDINGS: Between 2007 and 2013, NAS IR significantly increased from 7.74 to 31.56 per 1,000 live births per year (Z: -19.10, P < .0001). During this time period, opioid exposure increased (Z: -9.56, P < .0001), while cocaine exposure decreased (Z: 3.62, P = .0003). In 2013, the southeastern region of the state had the highest NAS IR of 48.76 per 1,000 live births. NAS infants were more likely to experience other clinical conditions, longer hospital stay, and be insured by Medicaid. CONCLUSIONS: Statewide NAS IR increased 4-fold over the study period, with rates over 3 times the national annual averages. This alarming trend is deleterious for the health of WV mother-child dyads and it strains the state's health care system. Therefore, WV has a unique need for prenatal public health drug treatment and prevention resources, specifically targeting the southeastern region. Further examination of maternal drug-specific trends and general underutilization of neonatal exposure ICD-9-CM codes is indicated.
Authors: S Kay Carpender; Paul H Campbell; Barbara J Quiram; Joshua Frances; Jill J Artzberger Journal: Public Health Rep Date: 2006 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 2.792
Authors: Hendrée E Jones; Karol Kaltenbach; Sarah H Heil; Susan M Stine; Mara G Coyle; Amelia M Arria; Kevin E O'Grady; Peter Selby; Peter R Martin; Gabriele Fischer Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2010-12-09 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Lucy Burns; Emma Black; Jennifer R Powers; Deborah Loxton; Elizabeth Elliott; Anthony Shakeshaft; Adrian Dunlop Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2011-04-04 Impact factor: 3.455
Authors: Stephen W Patrick; Robert E Schumacher; Brian D Benneyworth; Elizabeth E Krans; Jennifer M McAllister; Matthew M Davis Journal: JAMA Date: 2012-04-30 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Roger Chou; Gilbert J Fanciullo; Perry G Fine; Jeremy A Adler; Jane C Ballantyne; Pamela Davies; Marilee I Donovan; David A Fishbain; Kathy M Foley; Jeffrey Fudin; Aaron M Gilson; Alexander Kelter; Alexander Mauskop; Patrick G O'Connor; Steven D Passik; Gavril W Pasternak; Russell K Portenoy; Ben A Rich; Richard G Roberts; Knox H Todd; Christine Miaskowski Journal: J Pain Date: 2009-02 Impact factor: 5.820
Authors: Amna Umer; Sean Loudin; Stefan Maxwell; Christa Lilly; Meagan E Stabler; Lesley Cottrell; Candice Hamilton; Janine Breyel; Christina Mullins; Collin John Journal: Pediatr Res Date: 2018-10-04 Impact factor: 3.756
Authors: Emery R Eaves; Jarrett Barber; Ryann Whealy; Sara A Clancey; Rita Wright; Jill Hager Cocking; Joseph Spadafino; Crystal M Hepp Journal: PLoS One Date: 2021-06-03 Impact factor: 3.752