OBJECTIVE: The objective of the present study was to compare the effects of pitolisant on QTcF interval in a single ascending dose (SAD) study and a thorough QT (TQT) study. METHODS: The SAD study at three dose levels of pitolisant enrolled 24 males and the TQT study at two dose levels 25 males. Both studies intensively monitored ECGs and pitolisant exposure. Effect on QTcF interval was analysed by Intersection Union Test (IUT) and by exposure-response (ER) analysis. Results from the two studies were compared. RESULTS: In both studies, moxifloxacin effect established assay sensitivity. IUT analysis revealed comparable pitolisant-induced maximum mean (90 % confidence interval (CI)) placebo-corrected increase from baseline (ΔΔQTcF) in both the studies, being 13.3 (8.1; 18.5) ms at 200-mg and 9.9 (4.7; 15.1) ms at 240-mg doses in SAD study and 5.27 (2.35; 8.20) ms at 120-mg dose in TQT study. ER analysis revealed that ER slopes in SAD and TQT studies were comparable and significantly positive (0.031 vs 0.027 ms/ng/mL, respectively). At geometric mean concentrations, bootstrap predicted ΔΔQTcF (90 % CI) were 9.23 (4.68; 14.4) ms at 279 ng/mL (240-mg dose) in the SAD study and 4.97 (3.42; 8.19) ms at 156 ng/mL (120-mg dose) in the TQT study. CONCLUSION: Pitolisant lacked an effect of regulatory concern on QTc interval in both the studies, however analysed, suggesting that the results from the SAD study could have mitigated the need for a TQT study. Our findings add to the growing evidence that intensive ECG monitoring in early phase clinical studies can replace a TQT study.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: The objective of the present study was to compare the effects of pitolisant on QTcF interval in a single ascending dose (SAD) study and a thorough QT (TQT) study. METHODS: The SAD study at three dose levels of pitolisant enrolled 24 males and the TQT study at two dose levels 25 males. Both studies intensively monitored ECGs and pitolisant exposure. Effect on QTcF interval was analysed by Intersection Union Test (IUT) and by exposure-response (ER) analysis. Results from the two studies were compared. RESULTS: In both studies, moxifloxacin effect established assay sensitivity. IUT analysis revealed comparable pitolisant-induced maximum mean (90 % confidence interval (CI)) placebo-corrected increase from baseline (ΔΔQTcF) in both the studies, being 13.3 (8.1; 18.5) ms at 200-mg and 9.9 (4.7; 15.1) ms at 240-mg doses in SAD study and 5.27 (2.35; 8.20) ms at 120-mg dose in TQT study. ER analysis revealed that ER slopes in SAD and TQT studies were comparable and significantly positive (0.031 vs 0.027 ms/ng/mL, respectively). At geometric mean concentrations, bootstrap predicted ΔΔQTcF (90 % CI) were 9.23 (4.68; 14.4) ms at 279 ng/mL (240-mg dose) in the SAD study and 4.97 (3.42; 8.19) ms at 156 ng/mL (120-mg dose) in the TQT study. CONCLUSION: Pitolisant lacked an effect of regulatory concern on QTc interval in both the studies, however analysed, suggesting that the results from the SAD study could have mitigated the need for a TQT study. Our findings add to the growing evidence that intensive ECG monitoring in early phase clinical studies can replace a TQT study.
Entities:
Keywords:
Exposure–response analysis; ICH E14; Intersection Union Test; Pitolisant; Single ascending dose study; Thorough QT study
Authors: G Eichenbaum; M K Pugsley; D J Gallacher; R Towart; G McIntyre; U Shukla; J M Davenport; H R Lu; J Rohrbacher; V Hillsamer Journal: Br J Pharmacol Date: 2012-07 Impact factor: 8.739
Authors: Lorna Ewart; Mike Aylott; Mark Deurinck; Mike Engwall; David J Gallacher; Helena Geys; Philip Jarvis; Haisong Ju; Derek Leishman; Louise Leong; Nick McMahon; Andy Mead; Phil Milliken; Willi Suter; Ard Teisman; Karel Van Ammel; Hugo M Vargas; Rob Wallis; Jean-Pierre Valentin Journal: Toxicol Sci Date: 2014-09-21 Impact factor: 4.849
Authors: Jörg Täubel; Ulrike Lorch; Simon Coates; Sara Fernandes; Paul Foley; Georg Ferber; Jean-Pierre Gotteland; Oliver Pohl Journal: Clin Pharmacol Drug Dev Date: 2018-02-28