| Literature DB >> 26879576 |
Xiao-Ying Liu1, Fu-Cheng Liu1,2, Chun-Yu Deng1, Meng-Zhen Zhang1, Min Yang1, Ding-Zhang Xiao1, Qiu-Xiong Lin1, Shi-Ting Cai1, Su-Juan Kuang1, Jing Chen1, Shao-Xian Chen1, Jie-Ning Zhu1, Hui Yang1, Fang Rao1, Yong-Heng Fu1, Xi-Yong Yu3,4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In the early stage of diabetes, the cardiac ejection fraction is preserved, despite the existence of the subclinical cardiac dysfunction to some extent. However, the detailed phenotype of this dysfunction and the underlying mechanism remain unclear. To improve our understanding of this issue, we used low-dose STZ and high-fat diet to induce type 2 diabetic models in rats. The effects and the mechanism associated with the early stages of the disease were analyzed.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26879576 PMCID: PMC4754853 DOI: 10.1186/s12872-016-0220-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Cardiovasc Disord ISSN: 1471-2261 Impact factor: 2.298
Fig. 1The time course curve of OGTT of rats in 7 days after the induction treatment. Data are presented as mean ± SD. Plasma glucose of model rats was significantly higher than that of the control at all time points before and after glucose lavage. * P < 0.05; # P < 0.01
Blood glucose level of rats at 3 weeks. Data are presented as mean ± SD.
| Group | Size | Fasting plasma glucose | Two-hrs plasma glucose | Serum insulin |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| (mmol/L) | (mmol/L) | (ng/ml) | ||
| Control | 16 | 5.4 ± 1.0 | 6.9 ± 1.2 | 3.32 ± 1.01 |
| Model | 16 | 10.1 ± 7.3# | 18.8 ± 7.6# | 2.83 ± 1.07 |
#Compared to control group, P<0.01
Fig. 2a-e: typical analysis pictures of radial and circumferential strain and strain rate from the view of parasternal short axis (at the mid papillary muscle level) of control rats; f-j: typical analysis pictures of radial and circumferential strain and strain rate from the view of parasternal short axis (at the mid papillary muscle level) of model rats
Measurements of left ventricular (LV) function in rats by M-mode echocardiography from the parasternal short axis at the mid papillary muscle level, and colourful-Doppler across the mitral valve from the apical four chamber views
| 6 Weeks | 12 Weeks |
| ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control Rats | Model Rats | Control Rats | Model Rats |
|
|
|
| |
| ( | ( | ( | ( | |||||
| AWD(mm) | 1.82 ± 0.20 | 1.82 ± 0.17 | 1.74 ± 0.22 | 1.74 ± 0.25 | 0.9445 | 0.4912 | 0.7806 | 0.3278 |
| AWS (mm) | 2.86 ± 0.39 | 2.89 ± 0.32 | 2.59 ± 0.38 | 2.43 ± 0.19 | 0.9521 | 0.1701 | 0.2972 | 0.0091 |
| PWD (mm) | 2.15 ± 0.22 | 2.01 ± 0.33 | 1.87 ± 0.19 | 1.70 ± 0.23 | 0.3284 | 0.1142 | 0.0230* | 0.0652 |
| EDD (mm) | 7.44 ± 0.39 | 7.69 ± 0.99 | 7.47 ± 0.57 | 7.58 ± 0.57 | 0.5227 | 0.7959 | 0.6183 | 0.6498 |
| EF (%) | 72.61 ± 6.38 | 68.19 ± 8.64 | 66.37 ± 7.06 | 59.34 ± 5.27 | 0.2641 | 0.0629 | 0.0724 | 0.0651 |
| FS (%) | 43.33 ± 5.46 | 39.82 ± 7.03 | 38.22 ± 5.74 | 32.69 ± 3.65 | 0.2842 | 0.0613 | 0.0748 | 0.0330* |
| EDV (ml) | 293.78 ± 32.90 | 321.15 ± 93.93 | 308.12 ± 51.21 | 299.13 ± 58.17 | 0.4496 | 0.8122 | 0.5800 | 0.6012 |
| ESV (ml) | 80.28 ± 19.33 | 106.38 ± 48.40 | 105.11 ± 31.42 | 124.43 ± 35.19 | 0.1784 | 0.2979 | 0.0782 | 0.4485 |
| E/A Ratio | 1.54 ± 0.17 | 1.83 ± 0.51 | 1.68 ± 0.26 | 1.56 ± 0.18 | 0.1477 | 0.3586 | 0.2440 | 0.2109 |
| MVDT(ms) | 14.17 ± 5.80 | 17.45 ± 8.91 | 16.03 ± 2.56 | 16.77 ± 2.96 | 0.3969 | 0.6258 | 0.4473 | 0.8504 |
Data are presented as mean ± SD. Abbreviations AWD anterior wall in diastole, AWS anterior wall in systole, PWD posterior wall in diastole, EDD end-diastolic diameter, EF ejection fraction, FS fractional shortening, EDV end-diastolic volume, ESV end-systolic volume, E/A Ratio ratio of the early (E) to late (A) ventricular filling velocities, MVDT mitral valve deceleration time
P1 and P2, Model group compared to control group; P3 and P4, 12-week compared to 6-week group, *P<0.05
Fig. 3M-mode echocardiography measurement of left ventricular of rats during dobutamine infusion (10 g/kg/min) from tail intravenous at 12 weeks. The statistically differences of EF%, FS%, ESD and ESV between the two groups could be detected. * P < 0.05; # P < 0.01; Abbreviations: EF = ejection fraction; FS = fractional shortening; EDD = end-diastolic diameter; ESD = end-systolic diameter; EDV = end-diastolic volume; ESV = end-systolic volume
Peak regional and global strain and strain rate of rats at 6 weeks measured through STE. Views were detected from the parasternal short axis at the mid papillary muscle level
| Strain | Strain Rate | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control Rats | Model Rats |
| Control Rats | Model Rats |
| |||
| ( | ( | ( | ( | |||||
| Diastolic | Radial | AFW | −36.04 ± 12.68 | −9.05 ± 10.10 | <0.001# | −11.06 ± 4.14 | −7.63 ± 1.99 | 0.1144 |
| LW | −24.86 ± 4.25 | −10.16 ± 7.58 | <0.001# | −9.62 ± 2.87 | −5.79 ± 1.37 | 0.0087# | ||
| PW | −25.03 ± 11.78 | −10.39 ± 9.79 | 0.0076# | −8.37 ± 3.04 | −5.58 ± 1.77 | 0.0299* | ||
| IFW | −29.12 ± 13.97 | −11.21 ± 12.85 | 0.0126* | −8.52 ± 2.03 | −6.64 ± 1.78 | 0.0453* | ||
| PS | −22.88 ± 12.69 | −6.24 ± 4.63 | 0.0031# | 7.07 ± 2.99 | −5.78 ± 2.03 | 0.2376 | ||
| AS | −21.64 ± 13.99 | −4.24 ± 4.75 | 0.0209* | −6.89 ± 2.27 | −7.07 ± 1.71 | 0.7496 | ||
| Average | −26.63 ± 9.04 | −7.05 ± 5.97 | <0.001# | −9.13 ± 2.51 | −6.62 ± 1.16 | 0.0304* | ||
| Circumferential | AFW | 26.29 ± 12.24 | 1.43 ± 0.99 | <0.001# | 7.64 ± 2.77 | 4.44 ± 2.45 | 0.0417* | |
| LW | 27.35 ± 13.97 | 2.95 ± 2.63 | <0.001# | 7.31 ± 2.73 | 3.14 ± 2.02 | 0.0045# | ||
| PW | 31.07 ± 11.35 | 0.80 ± 0.34 | <0.001# | 8.06 ± 1.71 | 5.36 ± 1.92 | 0.0094# | ||
| IFW | 29.44 ± 19.96 | 0.81 ± 1.04 | <0.001# | 10.53 ± 6.33 | 5.74 ± 2.93 | 0.0789 | ||
| PS | 29.77 ± 19.52 | 0.90 ± 0.46 | 0.0010# | 8.10 ± 2.44 | 8.75 ± 6.02 | 0.7597 | ||
| AS | 21.32 ± 8.25 | 0.66 ± 0.40 | <0.001# | 6.25 ± 2.31 | 5.96 ± 1.80 | 0.9022 | ||
| Average | 29.57 ± 14.35 | 1.25 ± 0.69 | <0.001# | 7.98 ± 2.37 | 5.65 ± 2.55 | 0.1008 | ||
| Systolic | Radial | AFW | 38.72 ± 10.04 | 23.92 ± 9.61 | 0.0537 | 9.79 ± 6.05 | 4.76 ± 1.79 | 0.0407* |
| LW | 26.89 ± 14.94 | 19.44 ± 8.94 | 0.2461 | 7.76 ± 3.56 | 4.04 ± 1.83 | 0.0229* | ||
| PW | 25.87 ± 14.55 | 19.77 ± 10.01 | 0.3456 | 7.15 ± 1.54 | 3.97 ± 1.75 | 0.0012# | ||
| IFW | 24.83 ± 10.11 | 17.33 ± 10.48 | 0.1671 | 8.20 ± 3.16 | 4.30 ± 2.44 | 0.0158* | ||
| PS | 16.91 ± 6.25 | 10.63 ± 8.49 | 0.1144 | 6.93 ± 1.84 | 4.13 ± 2.82 | 0.0211* | ||
| AS | 25.73 ± 19.00 | 19.19 ± 7.47 | 0.3801 | 5.71 ± 2.15 | 4.02 ± 2.33 | 0.1817 | ||
| Average | 26.13 ± 9.75 | 18.12 ± 5.56 | 0.0630 | 8.67 ± 2.59 | 4.23 ± 1.94 | 0.0022# | ||
| Circumferential | AFW | −23.39 ± 8.39 | −15.77 ± 9.22 | 0.1495 | −6.74 ± 2.81 | −4.86 ± 3.78 | 0.3395 | |
| LW | −20.64 ± 6.31 | −10.34 ± 12.62 | 0.0584 | −6.54 ± 2.31 | −2.37 ± 1.29 | 0.0010# | ||
| PW | −21.98 ± 4.79 | −19.57 ± 8.18 | 0.5102 | −7.11 ± 1.41 | −5.26 ± 1.24 | 0.0238* | ||
| IFW | −24.04 ± 7.22 | −21.58 ± 10.30 | 0.3488 | −7.42 ± 2.52 | −5.45 ± 1.62 | 0.1154 | ||
| PS | −23.00 ± 3.23 | −27.95 ± 10.02 | 0.2074 | −8.25 ± 2.92 | −7.68 ± 4.87 | 0.8873 | ||
| AS | −19.84 ± 7.12 | −24.72 ± 8.53 | 0.1340 | −5.61 ± 1.78 | −6.60 ± 3.31 | 0.3478 | ||
| Average | −22.01 ± 3.87 | −19.99 ± 7.67 | 0.5314 | −6.95 ± 1.98 | −5.65 ± 3.18 | 0.4198 | ||
Data are presented as mean ± SD. Abbreviations: AFW anterior free wall, LW lateral wall, PW posterior wall, IFW inferior free wall, PS post septum, AS anterior septum
*Compared to control group, P<0.05; #Compared to control group, P<0.01
Fig. 4The calcium transient images before ISO treatment and values of isolated rat cardiomyocytes at 6 weeks. In control group, 32 cells were measured from 5 rats, whereas in model group 36 cells were measured from the same number of rats. Cells were electrically paced with 60 Hz current with or without isoprenaline (ISO) treatment. a: calcium transient image of cardiomyocyte of the control rat; b: calcium transient image of cardiomyocyte of the model rat. Data are presented as mean ± SD. Abbreviations: Tpeak = Time to peak; Tdecay1/2 = Time of 50 % decay from peak. Compared the control, the Tdecay1/2 of cardiomyocytes of model rats was significantly increased before and after ISO treatment. * P < 0.05; # P < 0.01
Fig. 5Western blotting analysis of the expression of key players of calcium transient and AMPK, Sirt1 in LV myocardium of rats. Data are presented as mean ± SD. GAPDH and α-tubulin were performed to ensure the equal loading of protein samples. Compared the control, the expression of PLN-p-S16 in model rats’ LV myocardium was increased whereas the Sirt1, AMPK-p and CaMKII-p-Thr287 were all decreased remarkably. * P < 0.05; # P < 0.01
Fig. 6Masson’s Trichrome Staining analysis. The normal cardiomyocytes were stained red, and fibrotic areas were stained green as usual. The results showed that till 12 weeks there was no significant fibrosis could be observed in model rats myocardium. Pictures were taken with 5 × objective lens