Sarah A Sullivan1, Elizabeth Bingman2, Ann O'Rourke2, Carla M Pugh3. 1. Faculty Associate in Educational Research, Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin, CSC H4/785B, 600 Highland Avenue, Madison, WI, 53729, USA. Electronic address: sullivans@surgery.wisc.edu. 2. Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA. 3. Vice Chair of Education and Patient Safety, Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA; UW Health Clinical Simulation Program, Madison, WI, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Surgical education programs are increasingly challenged to make medical students' learning experiences in their surgery rotation meaningful while making the most of limited faculty resources and maximizing patient safety. Simulations and virtual environments are potential resources for providing meaningful clinical learning experiences. METHODS: Ninety-eight 3rd-year medical students used the Virtual Surgical Patient Cases software as a part of their surgery clerkship. We used a mixed-methods approach to data collection and analyses to investigate how students and faculty engaged with cases as teaching and learning tools. RESULTS: Students improved their clinical reasoning skills significantly at each case attempt, but made some errors consistently across attempts. Faculty used the information provided about students' decisions during the cases to guide their teaching during case discussions. CONCLUSIONS: Including more cases in the surgical clerkship could allow students additional practice with making diagnoses and facilitate an interactive role in discussing cases with faculty.
BACKGROUND: Surgical education programs are increasingly challenged to make medical students' learning experiences in their surgery rotation meaningful while making the most of limited faculty resources and maximizing patient safety. Simulations and virtual environments are potential resources for providing meaningful clinical learning experiences. METHODS: Ninety-eight 3rd-year medical students used the Virtual Surgical Patient Cases software as a part of their surgery clerkship. We used a mixed-methods approach to data collection and analyses to investigate how students and faculty engaged with cases as teaching and learning tools. RESULTS: Students improved their clinical reasoning skills significantly at each case attempt, but made some errors consistently across attempts. Faculty used the information provided about students' decisions during the cases to guide their teaching during case discussions. CONCLUSIONS: Including more cases in the surgical clerkship could allow students additional practice with making diagnoses and facilitate an interactive role in discussing cases with faculty.
Authors: Alim Nagji; Yusuf Yilmaz; Peter Zhang; Joana Dida; Lauren Cook-Chaimowitz; Junghwan Kevin Dong; Lorraine Colpitts; James Beecroft; Teresa M Chan Journal: AEM Educ Train Date: 2020-08-09