| Literature DB >> 26878770 |
Liren Fan1, Jiqing Song2, Wenbo Bai2, Shengping Wang1, Ming Zeng1, Xiaoming Li1, Yang Zhou1, Haifeng Li1, Haiwei Lu3.
Abstract
A soil remediation method b<span class="Chemical">ased on magnetic beneficiation is reported. A new magnetic solid chelator powder, <span class="Chemical">FS@IDA (core-shell Fe3O4@SiO2 nanoparticles coated with iminodiacetic acid chelators), was used as a reactive magnetic carrier to selectively capture non-magnetic heavy metals in soil by chelation and removal by magnetic separation. FS@IDA was prepared via inorganic-organic and organic synthesis reactions that generated chelating groups on the surface of magnetic, multi-core, core-shell Fe3O4@SiO2 (FS) nanoparticles. These reactions used a silane coupling agent and sodium chloroacetate. The results show that FS@IDA could chelate the heavy metal component of Cd, Zn, Pb, Cu and Ni carbonates, lead sulfate and lead chloride in water-insoluble salt systems. The resulting FS@IDA-Cd and FS@IDA-Pb chelates could be magnetically separated, resulting in removal rates of approximately 84.9% and 72.2% for Cd and Pb, respectively. FS@IDA could not remove the residual heavy metals and those bound to organic matter in the soil. FS@IDA did not significantly alter the chemical composition of the soil, and it allowed for fast chelating capture, simple magnetic separation and facilitated heavy metal elution. FS@IDA could also be easily prepared and reprocessed.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26878770 PMCID: PMC4754707 DOI: 10.1038/srep21027
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Schematic of the preparation and reprocessing of FS@IDA for the chelation and removal of heavy metal ions (M2+).
FS, Fe3O4@SiO2; APTES, γ-aminopropyltriethoxysilane; FS@-N, surface-aminated FS; FS@IDA, magnetic solid trimethylene iminodiacetic acid chelator; FS@IDA-M, magnetic solid chelate complex; M2+, divalent heavy metal ion.
Figure 2Structure and characterization of the FS@IDA material.
(a) Transmission electron microscope image of FS@IDA. (b) X-ray diffraction patterns of Fe3O4 and FS@IDA. (c) Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy spectra.
Figure 3Magnetic hysteresis loop of FS@IDA.
Figure 4Effects of the presence of other cations on the quantity of Cd2+ adsorbed at different pH.
(a) Initial Cd2+ concentration of 2.67 mM. (b) Initial Cd2+ concentration of 0.89 mM.
Results for the dissolution of several insoluble compounds suspended in solution and the corresponding metal ion capture.
| Metal form | [M2+] = s (M) | Ion concentration after adsorption [M2+]′ = s′ (M) | Comparison | Dissolution observed? | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CdCO3 | 5.20 × 10−12 | 5.60 × 10−4 | 9.30 × 10−9 | 1.20 × 10−4 | 1.12 × 10−12 | Ksp′<Ksp | yes |
| ZnCO3 | 1.40 × 10−11 | 1.75 × 10−4 | 8.00 × 10−8 | 1.75 × 10−5 | 1.40 × 10−12 | Ksp′<Ksp | yes |
| PbCO3 | 7.40 × 10−14 | 1.28 × 10−5 | 5.78 × 10−9 | 1.01 × 10−6 | 5.93 × 10−15 | Ksp′<Ksp | yes |
| CuCO3 | 1.40 × 10−10 | 5.56 × 10−4 | 2.52 × 10−7 | 3.17 × 10−5 | 7.99 × 10−12 | Ksp′<Ksp | yes |
| NiCO3 | 6.60 × 10−9 | 3.82 × 10−3 | 1.73 × 10−6 | 6.10 × 10−5 | 1.56 × 10−10 | Ksp′<Ksp | yes |
| [ | |||||||
| PbSO4 | 1.6 × 10−8 | 1.26 × 10−4 | 1.26 × 10−4 | 1.01 × 10−6 | 1.27 × 10−10 | Ksp′<Ksp | yes |
| PbCl2 | 1.6 × 10−5 | 0.0252 | 0.0504 | 1.01 × 10−6 | 1.03 × 10−8 | Ksp′<Ksp | yes |
s is the solubility of the insoluble salt. Kand denote the solubility and concentration product constants, respectively.
Figure 5SEM-EDS of FS@IDA-Cd.
(a) SEM image. (b) EDS point spectrum. (c) Relative elemental content at the corresponding point. EDS images showing the locations of (d) C, (e) N, and (f) Cd atoms.
Total concentration and different fraction content of Cd, Pb, Cr, Zn, Hg and As in the soil sample (Mean ± SE, mg·kg−1).
| Heavy metal concentration | Cd | Pb | As | Cr | Zn | Hg | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before treatment | After treatment | Before treatment | After treatment | |||||
| Water-soluble fraction | 0.012 ± 0.01 | ~0 | 0.058 ± 0.01 | ~0 | 0.292 ± 0.029 | 0.060 ± 0.08 | 0.736 ± 0.75 | 0.018 ± 0.006 |
| Interchangeable fraction | 2.758 ± 0.22 | 0.071 ± 0.013 | 0.363 ± 0.048 | 0.964 ± 0.097 | 2.846 ± 0.31 | 6.816 ± 1.38 | ||
| Carbonate-bound fraction | 3.381 ± 0.30 | 33.39 ± 3.01 | 0.309 ± 0.028 | 1.723 ± 0.20 | 73.83 ± 6.89 | 0.119 ± 0.02 | ||
| Iron-manganese oxide-bound fraction | 3.094 ± 0.34 | 67.92 ± 7.59 | 0.451 ± 0.056 | 4.512 ± 0.77 | 378.3 ± 43.1 | 0.202 ± 0.04 | ||
| Organic-bound fraction | 0.738 ± 0.067 | 1.639 | 9.435 ± 1.02 | 52.70 | 3.306 ± 0.45 | 18.68 ± 2.06 | 90.45 ± 9.9 | 10.23 ± 1.67 |
| Residual fraction | 0.917 ± 0.11 | 79.12 ± 8.96 | 47.33 ± 5.51 | 169.0 ± 18.80 | 164.9 ± 22.4 | 1.312 ± 0.19 | ||
| Total content | 10.91 ± 2.06 | 190.0 ± 33.2 | 50.75 ± 4.72 | 194.9 ± 49.9 | 660.9 ± 99.0 | 18.66 ± 2.75 | ||
Figure 6Amount adsorbed and adsorption dynamics at different temperatures.
(a) Effects of the adsorption time on the amount of Cd2+ adsorbed on FS@IDA at different temperatures. (b) Data at 293 K were simulated using a quasi-secondary dynamics model, , where k2 is the adsorption rate constant, Qe is the amount adsorbed at equilibrium (mg·g−1) and Qt is the amount adsorbed at time t (mg·g−1).