Literature DB >> 26878696

Crowding and visual acuity measured in adults using paediatric test letters, pictures and symbols.

Sarah J H Lalor1, Monika A Formankiewicz1, Sarah J Waugh2.   

Abstract

Crowding refers to the degradation of visual acuity for target optotypes with, versus without, surrounding features. Crowding is important clinically, however the effect of target-flanker spacing on acuity for symbols and pictures, compared to letters, has not been investigated. Five adults with corrected-to-normal vision had visual acuity measured for modified single target versions of Kay Pictures, Lea Symbols, HOTV and Cambridge Crowding Cards, tests. Single optotypes were presented in isolation and with surrounding features placed 0-5 stroke-widths away. Visual acuity measured with Kay Picture optotypes is 0.13-0.19logMAR better than for other test optotypes and varies significantly across picture. The magnitude of crowding is strongest when the surrounding features abut, or are placed 1 stroke-width away from the target optotype. The slope of the psychometric function is steeper in the region just beyond maximum crowding. Crowding is strongest and the psychometric function steepest, with the Cambridge Crowding Cards arrangement, than when any single optotype is surrounded by a box. Estimates of crowding extent are less variable across test when expressed in units of stroke-width, than optotype-width. Crowding for single target presentations of letters, symbols and pictures used in paediatric visual acuity tests can be maximised and made more sensitive to change in visual acuity, by careful selection of optotype, by surrounding the target with similar flankers, and by using a closer target-flanker separation than half an optotype-width.
Copyright © 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Crowding; Paediatric visual acuity charts; Psychometric function slopes; Symbol and picture optotypes; Visual acuity

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26878696     DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2016.01.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  4 in total

1.  Comparison of visual acuity measurements via three different methods in preschool children: Lea symbols, crowded Lea symbols, Snellen E chart.

Authors:  Asli Inal; Osman Bulut Ocak; Ebru Demet Aygit; Ihsan Yilmaz; Berkay Inal; Muhittin Taskapili; Birsen Gokyigit
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-06-20       Impact factor: 2.031

2.  Mesopic visual acuity is less crowded.

Authors:  František Pluháček; John Siderov
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-05-28       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Do picture-based charts overestimate visual acuity? Comparison of Kay Pictures, Lea Symbols, HOTV and Keeler logMAR charts with Sloan letters in adults and children.

Authors:  Nicola S Anstice; Robert J Jacobs; Samantha K Simkin; Melissa Thomson; Benjamin Thompson; Andrew V Collins
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-02-02       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Crowding can impact both low and high contrast visual acuity measurements.

Authors:  František Pluháček; John Siderov; Ivana Macháčová
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-09-29       Impact factor: 4.996

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.