Literature DB >> 26878632

Method for screening prevention and control measures and technologies based on groundwater pollution intensity assessment.

Juan Li1, Yang Yang2, Huan Huan3, Mingxiao Li3, Beidou Xi4, Ningqing Lv3, Yi Wu5, Yiwen Xie6, Xiang Li3, Jinjin Yang3.   

Abstract

This paper presents a system for determining the evaluation and gradation indices of groundwater pollution intensity (GPI). Considering the characteristics of the vadose zone and pollution sources, the system decides which anti-seepage measures should be implemented at the contaminated site. The pollution sources hazards (PSH) and groundwater intrinsic vulnerability (GIV) are graded by the revised Nemerow Pollution Index and an improved DRTAS model, respectively. GPI is evaluated and graded by a double-sided multi-factor coupling model, which is constructed by the matrix method. The contaminated sites are categorized as prior, ordinary, or common sites. From the GPI results, we develop guiding principles for preventing and removing pollution sources, procedural interruption and remediation, and end treatment and monitoring. Thus, we can select appropriate prevention and control technologies (PCT). To screen the technological schemes and optimize the traditional analytical hierarchy process (AHP), we adopt the technique for order preference by the similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) method. Our GPI approach and PCT screening are applied to three types of pollution sites: the refuse dump of a rare earth mine development project (a potential pollution source), a chromium slag dump, and a landfill (existing pollution sources). These three sites are identified as ordinary, prior, and ordinary sites, respectively. The anti-seepage materials at the refuse dump should perform as effectively as a 1.5-m-thick clay bed. The chromium slag dump should be preferentially treated by soil flushing and in situ chemical remediation. The landfill should be treated by natural attenuation technology. The proposed PCT screening approach was compared with conventional screening methods results at the three sites and proved feasible and effective. The proposed method can provide technical support for the monitoring and management of groundwater pollution in China.
Copyright © 2015. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Existing pollution sources; Groundwater pollution intensity; Potential pollution sources; Prevention and control technologies; Unconfined groundwater

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26878632     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.12.152

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  4 in total

1.  Identifying spatial heterogeneity of groundwater and its response to anthropogenic activities.

Authors:  Zhi-Wei Wang; Hua-Wei Chen; Fu-Lin Li
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2019-08-10       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Assessment, formation mechanism, and different source contributions of dissolved salt pollution in the shallow groundwater of Hutuo River alluvial-pluvial fan in the North China Plain.

Authors:  Xiaowen Zhang; Jiangtao He; Baonan He; Jichao Sun
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2019-11-07       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Risk assessment of groundwater environmental contamination: a case study of a karst site for the construction of a fossil power plant.

Authors:  Fuming Liu; Shuping Yi; Haiyi Ma; Junyi Huang; Yukun Tang; Jianbo Qin; Wan-Huan Zhou
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Identification of dominating factors affecting vadose zone vulnerability by a simulation method.

Authors:  Juan Li; Beidou Xi; Wutian Cai; Yang Yang; Yongfeng Jia; Xiang Li; Yonggao Lv; Ningqing Lv; Huan Huan; Jinjin Yang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-04-07       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.