Literature DB >> 26878397

Time trends in axilla management among early breast cancer patients: Persisting major variation in clinical practice across European centers.

Adam Gondos1, Lina Jansen1, Jörg Heil2, Andreas Schneeweiss3, Adri C Voogd4, Jan Frisell5, Irma Fredriksson5, Ulla Johansson5, Tove Filtenborg Tvedskov6, Maj-Britt Jensen7, Eva Balslev8, Olaf Johan Hartmann-Johnsen9, Milena Sant10, Paolo Baili10, Roberto Agresti11, Tony van de Velde12, Annegien Broeks13, Jean-Marie Nogaret14, Pierre Bourgeois15, Michel Moreau16, Zoltán Mátrai17, Ákos Sávolt17, Péter Nagy18,19, Miklós Kásler20, Petra Schrotz-King21,22, Cornelia Ulrich21,22,23, Hermann Brenner1,21,23.   

Abstract

Background We examined time trends in axilla management among patients with early breast cancer in European clinical settings. Material and methods EUROCANPlatform partners, including population-based and cancer center-specific registries, provided routinely available clinical cancer registry data for a comparative study of axillary management trends among patients with first non-metastatic breast cancer who were not selected for neoadjuvant therapy during the last decade. We used an additional short questionnaire to compare clinical care patterns in 2014. Results Patients treated in cancer centers were younger than population-based registry populations. Tumor size and lymph node status distributions varied little between settings or over time. In 2003, sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) use varied between 26% and 81% for pT1 tumors, and between 2% and 68% for pT2 tumors. By 2010, SLNB use increased to 79-96% and 49-92% for pT1 and pT2 tumors, respectively. Axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) use for pT1 tumors decreased from between 75% and 27% in 2003 to 47% and 12% in 2010, and from between 90% and 55% to 79% and 19% for pT2 tumors, respectively. In 2014, important differences in axillary management existed for patients with micrometastases only, and for patients fulfilling the ACOSOG Z0011 criteria for omitting ALND. Conclusion This study demonstrates persisting differences in important aspects of axillary management throughout the recent decade. The results highlight the need for international comparative patterns of care studies in oncology, which may help to identify areas where further studies and consensus building may be necessary.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26878397     DOI: 10.3109/0284186X.2015.1136751

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Oncol        ISSN: 0284-186X            Impact factor:   4.089


  7 in total

1.  Non-sentinel axillary tumor burden applying the ACOSOG Z0011 eligibility criteria to a large routine cohort.

Authors:  Fabian Riedel; Jörg Heil; Manuel Feißt; Mahdi Rezai; Mareike Moderow; Christof Sohn; Florian Schütz; Michael Golatta; André Hennigs
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2019-06-24       Impact factor: 4.872

2.  Impact of the ACOSOG Z0011 trial on surgical practice in Asian patients: trends in axillary surgery for breast cancer from a Korean Breast Cancer Registry analysis.

Authors:  Chihwan Cha; Eun Young Kim; Sung Yong Kim; Jai Min Ryu; Min Ho Park; Seokwon Lee; Young-Jin Suh; Nayeon Choi; Hanpyo Hong; Hyung Suk Kim; Min Sung Chung
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-06-13       Impact factor: 3.253

3.  Axillary Clearance Following Positive Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Symptomatic Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Hudhaifah Shaker; Zeinab Mahate; Grit Dabritz; Mohammed S Absar
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2020 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.155

4.  Evaluation of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy and Axillary Lymph Node Dissection for Breast Cancer Treatment Concepts - a Retrospective Study of 1,214 Breast Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Roland G Stein; Roland Fricker; Thomas Rink; Hartmut Fitz; Sebastian Blasius; Joachim Diessner; Sebastian F M Häusler; Tanja N Stüber; Victoria Andreas; Achim Wöckel; Thomas Müller
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2017-10-20       Impact factor: 2.860

5.  Prognosis of breast cancer molecular subtypes in routine clinical care: A large prospective cohort study.

Authors:  André Hennigs; Fabian Riedel; Adam Gondos; Peter Sinn; Peter Schirmacher; Frederik Marmé; Dirk Jäger; Hans-Ulrich Kauczor; Anne Stieber; Katja Lindel; Jürgen Debus; Michael Golatta; Florian Schütz; Christof Sohn; Jörg Heil; Andreas Schneeweiss
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 4.430

Review 6.  Evaluation of guidelines regarding surgical treatment of breast cancer using the AGREE Instrument: a systematic review.

Authors:  Xin Lei; Fengtao Liu; Shuying Luo; Ya Sun; Liling Zhu; Fengxi Su; Kai Chen; Shunrong Li
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-11-14       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Survival and axillary recurrence following sentinel node-positive breast cancer without completion axillary lymph node dissection: the randomized controlled SENOMAC trial.

Authors:  Jana de Boniface; Jan Frisell; Yvette Andersson; Leif Bergkvist; Johan Ahlgren; Lisa Rydén; Roger Olofsson Bagge; Malin Sund; Hemming Johansson; Dan Lundstedt
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2017-05-26       Impact factor: 4.430

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.