Literature DB >> 26878203

Intracellular singlet oxygen photosensitizers: on the road to solving the problems of sensitizer degradation, bleaching and relocalization.

Elsa F F da Silva1, Frederico M Pimenta, Brian W Pedersen, Frances H Blaikie, Gabriela N Bosio, Thomas Breitenbach, Michael Westberg, Mikkel Bregnhøj, Michael Etzerodt, Luis G Arnaut, Peter R Ogilby.   

Abstract

Selected singlet oxygen photosensitizers have been examined from the perspective of obtaining a molecule that is sufficiently stable under conditions currently employed to study singlet oxygen behavior in single mammalian cells. Reasonable predictions about intracellular sensitizer stability can be made based on solution phase experiments that approximate the intracellular environment (e.g., solutions containing proteins). Nevertheless, attempts to construct a stable sensitizer based solely on the expected reactivity of a given functional group with singlet oxygen are generally not sufficient for experiments in cells; it is difficult to construct a suitable chromophore that is impervious to all of the secondary and/or competing degradative processes that are present in the intracellular environment. On the other hand, prospects are reasonably positive when one considers the use of a sensitizer encapsulated in a specific protein; the local environment of the chromophore is controlled, degradation as a consequence of bimolecular reactions can be mitigated, and genetic engineering can be used to localize the encapsulated sensitizer in a given cellular domain. Also, the option of directly exciting oxygen in sensitizer-free experiments provides a useful complementary tool. These latter systems bode well with respect to obtaining more accurate control of the "dose" of singlet oxygen used to perturb a cell; a parameter that currently limits mechanistic studies of singlet-oxygen-mediated cell signaling.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26878203     DOI: 10.1039/c5ib00295h

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Integr Biol (Camb)        ISSN: 1757-9694            Impact factor:   2.192


  6 in total

Review 1.  Light-induced oxidant production by fluorescent proteins.

Authors:  Adam J Trewin; Brandon J Berry; Alicia Y Wei; Laura L Bahr; Thomas H Foster; Andrew P Wojtovich
Journal:  Free Radic Biol Med       Date:  2018-02-06       Impact factor: 7.376

2.  Chromophore Renewal and Fluorogen-Binding Tags: A Match Made to Last.

Authors:  Frederico M Pimenta; Giovanni Chiappetta; Thomas Le Saux; Joëlle Vinh; Ludovic Jullien; Arnaud Gautier
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-09-26       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Near-infrared uncaging or photosensitizing dictated by oxygen tension.

Authors:  Erin D Anderson; Alexander P Gorka; Martin J Schnermann
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-11-17       Impact factor: 14.919

4.  Oxygen- and pH-Dependent Photophysics of Fluorinated Fluorescein Derivatives: Non-Symmetrical vs. Symmetrical Fluorination.

Authors:  Ciaran K McLoughlin; Eleni Kotroni; Mikkel Bregnhøj; Georgios Rotas; Georgios C Vougioukalakis; Peter R Ogilby
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-09-10       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 5.  EGFR-Targeted Photodynamic Therapy.

Authors:  Luca Ulfo; Paolo Emidio Costantini; Matteo Di Giosia; Alberto Danielli; Matteo Calvaresi
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 6.321

6.  Singlet oxygen modification abolishes voltage-dependent inactivation of the sea urchin spHCN channel.

Authors:  Vinay Idikuda; Weihua Gao; Khade Grant; Zhuocheng Su; Qinglian Liu; Lei Zhou
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  2018-07-24       Impact factor: 4.086

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.