David A Egger1, Andrew M Rappe2, Leeor Kronik1. 1. Department of Materials and Interfaces, Weizmann Institute of Science , Rehovoth 76100, Israel. 2. The Makineni Theoretical Laboratories, Department of Chemistry, University of Pennsylvania , Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-6323, United States.
Abstract
Hybrid organic-inorganic perovskites (HOIPs) are crystals with the structural formula ABX3, where A, B, and X are organic and inorganic ions, respectively. While known for several decades, HOIPs have only in recent years emerged as extremely promising semiconducting materials for solar energy applications. In particular, power-conversion efficiencies of HOIP-based solar cells have improved at a record speed and, after only little more than 6 years of photovoltaics research, surpassed the 20% threshold, which is an outstanding result for a solution-processable material. It is thus of fundamental importance to reveal physical and chemical phenomena that contribute to, or limit, these impressive photovoltaic efficiencies. To understand charge-transport and light-absorption properties of semiconducting materials, one often invokes a lattice of ions displaced from their static positions only by harmonic vibrations. However, a preponderance of recent studies suggests that this picture is not sufficient for HOIPs, where a variety of structurally dynamic effects, beyond small harmonic vibrations, arises already at room temperature. In this Account, we focus on these effects. First, we review structure and bonding in HOIPs and relate them to the promising charge-transport and absorption properties of these materials, in terms of favorable electronic properties. We point out that HOIPs are much "softer" mechanically, compared to other efficient solar-cell materials, and that this can result in large ionic displacements at room temperature. We therefore focus next on dynamic structural effects in HOIPs, going beyond a static band-structure picture. Specifically, we discuss pertinent experimental and theoretical findings as to phase-transition behavior and molecular/octahedral rearrangements. We then discuss atomic diffusion phenomena in HOIPs, with an emphasis on the migration of intrinsic and extrinsic ionic species. From this combined perspective, HOIPs appear as highly dynamic materials, in which structural fluctuations and long-range ionic motion have an unusually strong impact on charge-transport and optical properties. We highlight the potential implications of these effects for several intriguing phenomenological observations, ranging from scattering mechanisms and lifetimes of charge carriers to light-induced structural effects and ionic conduction.
Hybrid organic-inorganic perovskites (HOIPs) are crystals with the structural formula ABX3, where A, B, and X are organic and inorganic ions, respectively. While known for several decades, HOIPs have only in recent years emerged as extremely promising semiconducting materials for solar energy applications. In particular, power-conversion efficiencies of HOIP-based solar cells have improved at a record speed and, after only little more than 6 years of photovoltaics research, surpassed the 20% threshold, which is an outstanding result for a solution-processable material. It is thus of fundamental importance to reveal physical and chemical phenomena that contribute to, or limit, these impressive photovoltaic efficiencies. To understand charge-transport and light-absorption properties of semiconducting materials, one often invokes a lattice of ions displaced from their static positions only by harmonic vibrations. However, a preponderance of recent studies suggests that this picture is not sufficient for HOIPs, where a variety of structurally dynamic effects, beyond small harmonic vibrations, arises already at room temperature. In this Account, we focus on these effects. First, we review structure and bonding in HOIPs and relate them to the promising charge-transport and absorption properties of these materials, in terms of favorable electronic properties. We point out that HOIPs are much "softer" mechanically, compared to other efficient solar-cell materials, and that this can result in large ionic displacements at room temperature. We therefore focus next on dynamic structural effects in HOIPs, going beyond a static band-structure picture. Specifically, we discuss pertinent experimental and theoretical findings as to phase-transition behavior and molecular/octahedral rearrangements. We then discuss atomic diffusion phenomena in HOIPs, with an emphasis on the migration of intrinsic and extrinsic ionic species. From this combined perspective, HOIPs appear as highly dynamic materials, in which structural fluctuations and long-range ionic motion have an unusually strong impact on charge-transport and optical properties. We highlight the potential implications of these effects for several intriguing phenomenological observations, ranging from scattering mechanisms and lifetimes of charge carriers to light-induced structural effects and ionic conduction.
Hybrid organic–inorganic
perovskites (HOIPs), the structure
of which is defined below, are materials which are solution processable,
comprise earth-abundant elements, and yet exhibit outstanding semiconducting
and light-absorption properties (see refs (1−3) for overviews). These features render HOIPs promising
for (opto-) electronic applications in general and photovoltaic (PV)
devices in particular,[4−7] as power-conversion efficiencies surpassed 20% after some 6 years
of PV research.[8] The microscopic origin
of this success lies partly in the electronic structure of HOIPs,
which is well understood:[9,10] it resembles that of
a good inorganic semiconductor, with optical gaps that can be close
to optimal for solar absorption, small exciton binding energies, and
low effective masses. This combination allows for efficient charge-carrier
generation, transport, and collection.In this Account, we first
review the static structural and electronic
properties of HOIPs. We then show that the static band-structure picture,
possibly with harmonically vibrating ions, still leaves important
phenomena, for example, light-induced effects or hysteresis in the
current–voltage curves of HOIP solar cells, unexplained. We
therefore focus on dynamic structural effects in
HOIPs, highlighting important molecular and octahedral rearrangements,
as well as ion migration phenomena, discuss how those could explain
some of the remaining mysteries of HOIPs, and suggest further routes
for progress.
Crystal Structure, Bonding,
and Phase Transitions
of HOIPs
Perovskites
possess the formula ABX3, where A, B, and X are ions that
obey size restrictions quantified by the Goldschmidt
tolerance factor:[11]where r, r, and r denote the ionic radii. When t is close to unity,
the “aristotype” ideal
cubic perovskite structure can form. It consists of corner-shared BX6 octahedra and A-cations
occupying the voids between them. When t significantly
deviates from unity, perovskite motifs with edge- and face-sharing
octahedra may be favored over the corner-sharing structure.[12]Perovskites can adopt a wide variety of
phases that typically involve
small symmetry-breaking distortions of the aristotype,[13] for example, octahedral tilts (characterized
with Glazer’s notation[14]), A- and B-cation displacements, and their
combinations. Many crystal structures and space groups are accessible
from the aristotype, including polar space groups, that is, ferroelectric
and antiferroelectric ones.[15]In
HOIPs, the A-site is occupied by a small organic
cation (typically methylammonium, MA). Most HOIPs studied today have
a divalent metallic atom (e.g., Pb or Sn) on the B-site and halogens (I, Br, Cl) on the X-sites. Figure a shows a schematic
of the prototypical MAPbI3,[16] described by Weber long ago,[17] including
the tetragonal and orthorhombic structures it adopts at lower temperatures
(determined by X-ray diffraction, XRD).[18] The molecular cation has a dipole moment and a symmetry lower than
that of the (ideal) BX6 octahedron. Neighboring
molecules in HOIPs can, in principle, align in different ways over
various length scales. Therefore, while t can still
be ≈1, one expects molecule-based symmetry breaking leading
to a rich structural variety accessible at a given temperature. Indeed,
density functional theory (DFT) calculations have shown that close
to equilibrium many different structures are locally stable and differ
in energy by only a few meV/formula unit.[19−22] Phase diagrams and associated
static and dynamic structural features of HOIPs can thus be particularly
rich and interesting.
Figure 1
(a) Schematic representation of methylammonium lead iodide
(MAPbI3) and its crystal structures at different temperatures.[16] Upper (lower) panels show side (top) views.
Dashed lines represent unit cell boundaries. Phase-transition temperatures
were taken from ref (18). Adapted with permission from ref (16). Copyright 2015 American Physical Society. (b)
Total and projected density of states of tetragonal MAPbI3, showing orbital-specific contributions.[90] Reproduced with permission from ref (90). Copyright 2014 The Royal Society of Chemistry.
(c) Graphical summary of pairwise dispersive energies, EvdW, between atomic sites A and B in the unit cell of MAPbI3 (left panel), MAPbBr3 (center panel), and MAPbCl3 (right panel).[26] Reproduced with permission from ref (26). Copyright 2014 American
Chemical Society.
(a) Schematic representation of methylammonium lead iodide
(MAPbI3) and its crystal structures at different temperatures.[16] Upper (lower) panels show side (top) views.
Dashed lines represent unit cell boundaries. Phase-transition temperatures
were taken from ref (18). Adapted with permission from ref (16). Copyright 2015 American Physical Society. (b)
Total and projected density of states of tetragonal MAPbI3, showing orbital-specific contributions.[90] Reproduced with permission from ref (90). Copyright 2014 The Royal Society of Chemistry.
(c) Graphical summary of pairwise dispersive energies, EvdW, between atomic sites A and B in the unit cell of MAPbI3 (left panel), MAPbBr3 (center panel), and MAPbCl3 (right panel).[26] Reproduced with permission from ref (26). Copyright 2014 American
Chemical Society.This diversity can be
linked to cohesion in HOIPs, for which ionic
bonding is a major driving force. This manifests itself in the electronic
structure of HOIPs (e.g., MAPbI3, see Figure b),[23,90] characterized by an anionic (iodide) valence and cationic (lead)
conduction band.[9,10,23,90] The oxidation state of the X-ions in halide-based HOIPs is −1 (instead of −2 in
oxideperovskites), and the Madelung potential is significantly less
binding for HOIPs than for oxides.[24] Again
using MAPbI3 as an example, Pb and I also interact covalently
to some extent, especially due to interaction of lone-pair Pb 6s with
I 5p electrons, contributing to the top of the valence band (Figure b).[9,10,23,90] The species in HOIPs have large polarizabilities and can support
significant dispersive interactions. Therefore, ordinarily weak interactions,
notably van der Waals (vdW) interactions, and hydrogen bonding supported
by the organic cation, also play an important role for the structure
of HOIPs, especially given relatively weak electrostatic binding.[25−27] Accordingly, first-principles calculations demonstrated the importance
of vdW-interactions among the inorganic atoms[25−27] and H-bonding
between the organic moieties and inorganic octahedra (Figure c).[26]Significant contributions of the organic cation to the HOIP
band
structure are found only at several eV below the valence band maximum
(Figure b),[9,10,23,90] that is, beyond H-bonding there is essentially no hybridization
between the organic and inorganic part of HOIPs. Instead, the molecule
acts as a scaffold, big enough so that lead-halide perovskites can
form (with favorable t) close to room temperature.
The large size of MA is important, because the analogous all-inorganic,
CsPbI3, adopts the edge-sharing NH4CdCl3 structure at ambient conditions rather than the cubic perovskite
one, with a significantly different electronic structure that is less
favorable for photovoltaics.[3]The
above considerations suggest that chemical bonds are not stiff
in HOIPs. Indeed, lattice constants of ideal cubic MAPbX3 span 5.7–6.3 Å, significantly larger than
the 3.8–4.2 Å common for oxideperovskites.[13] Furthermore, experimental and theoretical Young
and bulk moduli of different HOIPs[26,28−31] are between ≈10 and 25 GPa, that is, at least tens of GPa
smaller than values for typical oxideperovskites or inorganic semiconductors.
This means that HOIPs easily
accept changes to their equilibrium bond lengths, providing for large
conformational freedom compared to other semiconductors with similar
electronic properties.The rich structural diversity, together
with the material flexibility
of HOIPs, may lead to different phases being present locally (i.e., multiple variants of the aristotype coexist) in HOIP films
and surfaces. Indeed, theoretical work showed that XRD patterns are
compatible with different coexisting phases[32] and that on a sub-ps time scale systems can deviate from the ideal
structure.[33] Moreover, the thermodynamic
stability of HOIPs, quantified by the segregation energy of ABX3 → AX + BX2, is very low.[34] Therefore,
regions containing a fraction of the binary components (BX2 and/or AX) and other complexes are
another possibility discussed in the literature.[35] Practically, the local presence of secondary phases is
especially relevant to HOIPs in which phase transitions can occur
around room temperature, notably MAPbI3 (Figure a).
Molecular
Rotations and Octahedral Distortions
A peculiar aspect of
HOIPs, compared to traditional semiconductors,
is that the organic molecule may undergo significant rearrangements
in the ideal crystal. This phenomenon was invoked for MAPbX3 by Weber already in 1978:[17] the nonspherical MA apparently does not distort the lead
halide octahedra and significant MA motion explains the MA appearing
to be spherical on average.[17]To
understand molecular rearrangements microscopically, recall
that the potential energy surface of the molecule is influenced by
interactions with neighboring BX6 octahedra
and molecule–molecule coupling. Dipole–dipole interactions
of molecules with distorted metal-halide octahedra could also play
a role for lower-symmetry HOIP structures, with molecule–molecule
coupling expected to be largely due to (screened) dipole–dipole
interactions. Typical organic cations, notably MA, allow for several
low-energy orientations as part of the perovskite structure, for example,
aligned with corners, edges, or faces of the inorganic cages (Figure a).[36,37] Theoretically, energy barriers for molecular rotation can be as
low as several meV,[10,19,20] suggesting significant movement of molecules at finite temperatures.
Indeed, dielectric response and Raman spectroscopy results were interpreted
by light exposure inducing or enhancing molecular rearrangements.[38,39] Specific experimental evidence for molecular rearrangements is strong.
Early measurements of 2H and 14N solid-state
nuclear magnetic resonance spectra indicated rapid (sub-ps correlation
times) molecular reorientations for the high-temperature phases of
deuterated MAPbX3, essentially independent
of anion identity,[40] as confirmed recently.[41] Temperature-dependent dielectric response measurements
of MAPbX3, analyzed using the Debye model,
suggested dynamic disorder of MA dipoles involving ps relaxation.[18] Dynamic disorder was also found in Cs-based
all-inorganic crystals, suggesting that in lead-halide perovskites
dynamic disorder is relevant irrespectively of the A-site cation.[42]
Figure 2
(a) Possible minimum-energy
orientations and associated reorientation
pathways, indexed from (i) to (v), for MA+ in MAPbI3, based on rotation (2) in panel (b). (b) Two modes of rotation
of MA+: (1) rotation of CH3 or NH3; (2) rotation of MA+, swapping locations of C and N.
Reproduced with permission from ref (37). Copyright 2015 Macmillan Publishers Ltd.: Nature
Communications. (c) Temperature-dependent mean-squared displacement
of hydrogen atoms in MAPbBr3 from neutron scattering. Reproduced
with permission from ref (47). Copyright 2015 American Physical Society.
(a) Possible minimum-energy
orientations and associated reorientation
pathways, indexed from (i) to (v), for MA+ in MAPbI3, based on rotation (2) in panel (b). (b) Two modes of rotation
of MA+: (1) rotation of CH3 or NH3; (2) rotation of MA+, swapping locations of C and N.
Reproduced with permission from ref (37). Copyright 2015 Macmillan Publishers Ltd.: Nature
Communications. (c) Temperature-dependent mean-squared displacement
of hydrogen atoms in MAPbBr3 from neutron scattering. Reproduced
with permission from ref (47). Copyright 2015 American Physical Society.Combining quasi-elastic neutron scattering measurements
with Monte
Carlo simulations for MAPbI3, Leguy et al. suggested two
primary molecular motions dominant at room temperature (Figure b):[37] Motion of CH3 and NH3 about the C–N
axis, or of the entire MA unit by rotation perpendicular to the C–N
axis, which can occur via several possible pathways (Figure a). These two processes have
different activation energies and thus occur at somewhat different
time scales: the CH3- or NH3-related events
occur at a possibly sub-ps time scale, whereas the realignment of
the entire molecular unit is slower (3–14 ps), of similar magnitude
to that deduced from molecular dynamics (MD)[43,44] and recent experiments.[45,46] One can therefore conclude
that at room and higher temperatures, molecules in HOIPs have large
conformational freedom. This agrees with Weber’s analysis:[17]through extensive rotational dynamics
of the molecular unit, the overall symmetry of HOIP crystals is increased. More restricted molecular rotations correspond to a lower overall
symmetry of the molecular unit and can be interpreted as symmetry-breaking
distortions from the ideal thermally symmetrized A-site.Consistent with this interpretation, molecular rotation
in HOIPs
was found to be strongly temperature-dependent, as deduced from the
mean-squared displacement of the hydrogen atoms extracted from temperature-dependent
neutron scattering (Figure c).[47] Once HOIPs are cooled and
undergo phase transitions into tetragonal and orthorhombic structures,
hydrogen displacements become smaller, indicating that rotations are
restricted: experimental and theoretical results have shown that at
lower temperatures molecular orientations are confined to high-symmetry
directions of the crystal[40,44] and reorientation energy
barriers are enhanced.[21]As T is lowered, the AX12 cuboctahedra
shrink (due to BX6 octahedral
rotations), so there is less space for molecular rearrangements. It
is therefore reasonable that molecular and octahedral rearrangements
are acting in concert: molecules reorient over short times
and, because BX6 distortions and molecular
rotations are coupled, bond lengths and angles of the BX6 octahedra also change significantly.[20,32,37] In this context, consider the related HOIP
MAPbBr3, for which molecular rotations have been described
as coupled to BX6 octahedral distortions,
resulting in coupling of order–disorder and displacive phase-transitions.[47] Interestingly, for MAPbI3, phonon
spectra also indicate significant coupling between molecular and PbI6-related modes.[16]Such cooperative
action of molecular rotations and octahedral distortions
suggests that HOIPs are dynamic materials: a snapshot of a
single structure cannot account for important dynamical effects and, thus, does not provide sufficient insight into their properties.
For example, first-principles calculations showed that the band gap
magnitude, and even whether it is direct or slightly indirect, can
change with molecular rotation.[20] This
is interesting, given that the molecular electronic states do not
contribute to the frontier levels in HOIPs (vide supra). However,
consider that for a related Sn-based HOIP, molecular rearrangements
influence the band structure[48] through
electrostatic and hydrogen-bonding effects on the inorganic ions,
which are primarily responsible for the band-edge electronic structure.[9,10,23,90] Therefore, structural fluctuations at room temperature can induce
dynamical changes in important electronic-structure parameters, for
example, band gap, effective masses, and possibly carrier lifetimes.
Such effects have been reported also for Pb-based HOIPs based on MD,
which at 320 K predict time-dependent band gap changes of 0.1–0.2
eV.[32,33]We speculate that the interplay of
electronic and structural dynamical
phenomena can result in a number of interesting electron–lattice
coupling effects in HOIPs.[49] For example,
scattering of charge-carriers by acoustic phonons may help understand
some as-yet unexplained results for modest carrier mobilities of HOIPs.[49,50] Polaronic effects in HOIPs could also be important and were invoked
to explain low mobilities,[49,51,52] light-induced changes of the low-frequency dielectric response,[39] and photostability due to coupling of light-generated
carriers to polar fluctuations in the lattice.[53]Molecular rotations, octahedral distortions, and
phase transitions
are closely related to ferroelectricity, which for HOIPs is possible
in principle because lower-temperature phases can crystallize in polar
space groups.[2] Ferroelectricity in HOIPs
has been studied based on Berry phase calculations, predicting polarization
of ≈4–12 μC/cm2 for the lower-temperature
phases of MAPbX3 (X =
I, Br, Cl),[22,54,55] significantly lower than values reported for ferroelectric oxides,
for example, BaTiO3. Measuring ferroelectric hysteresis
in HOIPs is challenging, given their small band gap and relatively
large number of mobile carriers, which can result in leakage currents.[13,22] The ferroelectric nature of HOIPs is therefore currently disputed,
with reports claiming either presence[56] or absence[22,57] of ferroelectricity. Interestingly,
Zhou et al.[21] predict that in MAPbI3 different molecular orientations have a larger impact on
the polarization than lead displacements.Given the molecular
flexibility and rich structural diversity of
HOIPs, large ferroelectric domains in HOIPs could indeed be difficult
to stabilize over a sufficiently long time at room temperature. But
one could also consider short-lived ferroelectric domains in HOIPs.[24,36] Interestingly, long-range electrostatic interactions of molecular
dipoles can induce polar domains via regions of (partially) aligned
dipoles.[36,58] Such domains can alter the HOIP band gap,[54] separate electron and hole wave functions (Figure a),[58] and suppress carrier recombination.[59,60] Polar domains can also serve as channels for segregated transfer
of electrons and holes, for example, by domain-wall formation (Figure b),[24,36,54] which could partly explain the
long carrier lifetimes of HOIPs. Ferroelectric phenomena in principle
could also help explain the hysteresis observed in HOIP solar cells,[61] although recent results put this into question.[37] Furthermore, ferroelectricity can give rise
to a bulk PV effect, also discussed for HOIPs.[62,63] The possibly strong impact of ferroelectricity and polar domains
on charge-transport calls for establishing more definitive experimental
evidence for its absence or presence in HOIPs, at best combined with
advanced theory that can account for the structural fluctuations.
Figure 3
(a) Isosurface
representation of the charge densities associated
with the conduction band minimum (CBM) and valence band maximum (VBM)
in a 20736-atom supercell of MAPbI3 with MA randomly oriented
along the eight ⟨111⟩ directions.[58] Reproduced with permission from ref (58). Copyright 2015 American
Chemical Society. (b) Schematic illustration of steps in the electrostatic
potential, causing electron–hole separations in an array of
uncharged domain walls (UCDWs).[54] Reproduced
with permission from ref (54). Copyright 2015 American Chemical Society.
(a) Isosurface
representation of the charge densities associated
with the conduction band minimum (CBM) and valence band maximum (VBM)
in a 20736-atom supercell of MAPbI3 with MA randomly oriented
along the eight ⟨111⟩ directions.[58] Reproduced with permission from ref (58). Copyright 2015 American
Chemical Society. (b) Schematic illustration of steps in the electrostatic
potential, causing electron–hole separations in an array of
uncharged domain walls (UCDWs).[54] Reproduced
with permission from ref (54). Copyright 2015 American Chemical Society.
The Role of Ion Migration
For HOIPs, as for any semiconductor, knowledge of defects is crucial
for understanding the electrical properties. Several defect-related
observations have been reported, including very long charge-carrier
diffusion lengths and low trap densities.[64−66] Here, we focus
on migration of ionic defects, invoked to explain
phenomenological observations including hysteresis[61,67,68] (via ion-blocking contacts), switchable
PV effects,[69,70] and light-induced changes in
structural[38,69−72] and dielectric properties.[39] Whether (intrinsic or extrinsic) ions can diffuse
at room temperature is, naturally, also relevant for material stability.For some inorganic lead-halide perovskites[73] and lead dihalides,[74] ion migration has
been investigated decades ago. These conduct anions through vacancies,
with activation energies of ≈0.2–0.4 eV. For HOIPs,
ionic conduction was proposed by Dualeh et al. based on impedance
spectroscopy.[75] Recently, several experimental
and theoretical studies presented more detailed evidence for migration of intrinsic ionic defects in HOIPs. Yang et al.
measured temperature-dependent conductivities of MAPbI3, showing an activation energy of ≈0.4 eV.[76] Using impedance spectroscopy and galvanostatic DC-measurements,
they argued that MAPbI3 is a mixed ionic-electronic conductor,
with surprisingly large ionic conductivities in the dark, even surpassing
the electronic ones.[76] Yuan et al. reported
that the MAPbI3 conductivity in the dark consists of two
regions (Figure a):[77] the first (100–270 K) exhibits activation
energies of ≈40 meV, assigned to electronic carriers, and the
second (290–350 K) 10-fold larger ones (≈0.4 eV), assigned
to ionic migration.[77]
Figure 4
(a) Arrhenius plot of
the electrical conductivity of MAPbI3 in the dark (blue)
and under illumination (red).[77] Reproduced
with permission from ref (77). Copyright 2015 Wiley-VCH
Verlag GmbH & Co. (b–d) Schematics of ionic diffusion mechanisms
in MAPbI3: migration of I vacancies (b),[78] MA vacancies (c),[78] and hydrogen
interstitials (d).[83] Panels (b) and (d)
show pathways with several geometries. Reproduced with permission
from ref (78). Copyright
2015 Macmillan Publishers Ltd.: Nature Communications. Adapted from
ref (83). Copyright
2015 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co.
(a) Arrhenius plot of
the electrical conductivity of MAPbI3 in the dark (blue)
and under illumination (red).[77] Reproduced
with permission from ref (77). Copyright 2015 Wiley-VCH
Verlag GmbH & Co. (b–d) Schematics of ionic diffusion mechanisms
in MAPbI3: migration of I vacancies (b),[78] MA vacancies (c),[78] and hydrogen
interstitials (d).[83] Panels (b) and (d)
show pathways with several geometries. Reproduced with permission
from ref (78). Copyright
2015 Macmillan Publishers Ltd.: Nature Communications. Adapted from
ref (83). Copyright
2015 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co.While these two studies present independent experimental
evidence
for ion migration with similar activation energies, they disagree
on the diffusion constant (by some 3 orders of magnitude) and over which ion moves. Yang et al. used a solid-state Pb|MAPbI3|AgI|Ag electrochemical cell and observed PbI2 formation
at the Pb|MAPbI3 interface under bias, indicating that
I– is the fastest intrinsic defect (Figure b).[76,78] In contrast, using photothermal induced resonance microscopy, Yuan
et al. concluded that MA+ migrates (see Figure c)[78] when the device is electrically poled.[77] They recently reported evidence for iodide vacancy migration at
elevated temperatures, relevant in the decomposition of MAPbI3 under small electric fields.[79]Further results supporting either migration model have been
found.
It was argued that under illumination of mixed iodide-bromide films,
halides can segregate into regions that are structurally different
from the rest of the film (cf. section ), influencing its optical properties.[72] However, it was recently found that the organic cations
(MA and formamidinium) can be rapidly exchanged, implying that organic
cations may also be mobile.[80] Because HOIPs
can easily deviate from their ideal bulk structure, as emphasized
throughout, dynamical disorder, grain boundaries, and other nonidealities
can also affect ion migration.Recently, ion diffusion has been
examined theoretically, allowing
the identification of minimum energy paths and barriers for ideal
structures. Calculations of defects and their diffusion are highly
sensitive to the underlying theoretical and numerical framework. For
HOIPs, migration barriers of 0.1–0.6 eV are found for iodide
vacancies and of 0.5–0.9 eV for MA+ migration,[78,81,82] which are quite large deviations.
Thus, theoretically there is still significant uncertainty over which
ions actually migrate.We recently suggested an additional mechanism
for ion migration:
diffusion of hydrogen impurities, for example, protons (Figure d).[83] Hydrogen is an important extrinsic defect in inorganic
semiconductors and some oxideperovskites are well-known proton conductors.[84] In HOIPs, hydrogen could therefore exist as
extrinsic (introduced, e.g., via H2O-induced partial decomposition
of the HOIP, as speculated in ref (24)) or as intrinsic defects (through the organic
unit). Our calculations predicted low migration barriers (∼0.1–0.2
eV) for H+ in MAPbI3 and showed that diffusion
mechanisms resemble those discussed for oxide proton conductors, involving
transient H-bonds (Figure d).[83] We showed that differently
charged defects prefer different sites (to be near ions of opposite
charge), allowing for ionization-enhanced defect migration. This may
be relevant for other defects and charging scenarios and has been
supported by recent experiments.[85] Given
that hydrogen impurities are difficult to control, H migration can
complicate the interpretation of conductivity measurements, especially
in light of recent findings on H2O adsorption and associated
degradation mechanisms.[85−89]
Summary and Conclusions
In this Account,
we provided an overview of structural dynamics
of hybrid organic–inorganic perovskites (HOIPs), a family of
materials that is highly interesting for applications in (opto)electronics
and also puzzling from a scientific perspective. This is especially
so considering a number of experimental observations that are atypical
in the context of other highly efficient materials for PV.We
discussed crystal cohesion and bonding, showing that it is relatively
weak, based on the mechanical properties of HOIPs and on first-principles
calculations. This is especially relevant given that perovskites can
access many lower-symmetry structures from an aristotype, which for
HOIPs implies a large pool of structural motifs accessible at room
temperature. In thin films, secondary structural phases could therefore
exist. We discussed several findings on rotational dynamics of molecular
cations in HOIPs, highlighting their strong connection with octahedral
distortions, which can influence the electronic properties of HOIPs.
Together with the notion of locally fluctuating regions bearing secondary
phases, one may envision domains that can locally facilitate (or hinder)
charge-carrier transport and/or separation.Finally, more and
more evidence points toward significant migration
of ionic species in HOIPs. It is unclear which species is/are moving,
but experimental and theoretical studies proposed several different
defect models, including halide and molecular vacancies, as well as
hydrogen impurities.From this perspective, HOIPs emerge as
materials that are highly
flexible mechanically and structurally dynamic. Given the potentially
strong impact of structural fluctuations on charge-transport and optical
properties, it appears necessary to call for a change in the perception
of HOIPs: Envisioning them in one specific structure at a given temperature,
distorted only by small and harmonic changes, clearly falls short
of recognizing dynamical phenomena as an outstanding characteristic
of these materials.We conclude that HOIPs are “on the
move” and hope
that our emphasis on this issue will trigger further experimental
and theoretical work to establish a microscopic understanding of their
structural dynamics. We believe that this will be relevant to open
questions in the field, some of which we have outlined throughout
this Account. It may furthermore shine light on an important and curious
property: that a high-quality semiconductor can be processed from
solution by simple means.
Authors: Thomas M Brenner; David A Egger; Andrew M Rappe; Leeor Kronik; Gary Hodes; David Cahen Journal: J Phys Chem Lett Date: 2015-11-17 Impact factor: 6.475
Authors: Dong Shi; Valerio Adinolfi; Riccardo Comin; Mingjian Yuan; Erkki Alarousu; Andrei Buin; Yin Chen; Sjoerd Hoogland; Alexander Rothenberger; Khabiboulakh Katsiev; Yaroslav Losovyj; Xin Zhang; Peter A Dowben; Omar F Mohammed; Edward H Sargent; Osman M Bakr Journal: Science Date: 2015-01-30 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: John A Brehm; Joseph W Bennett; Michael Rutenberg Schoenberg; Ilya Grinberg; Andrew M Rappe Journal: J Chem Phys Date: 2014-06-14 Impact factor: 3.488
Authors: Jarvist M Frost; Keith T Butler; Federico Brivio; Christopher H Hendon; Mark van Schilfgaarde; Aron Walsh Journal: Nano Lett Date: 2014-04-07 Impact factor: 11.189
Authors: Bikash Kumar Shaw; Ashlea R Hughes; Maxime Ducamp; Stephen Moss; Anup Debnath; Adam F Sapnik; Michael F Thorne; Lauren N McHugh; Andrea Pugliese; Dean S Keeble; Philip Chater; Juan M Bermudez-Garcia; Xavier Moya; Shyamal K Saha; David A Keen; François-Xavier Coudert; Frédéric Blanc; Thomas D Bennett Journal: Nat Chem Date: 2021-05-10 Impact factor: 24.427
Authors: M Songvilay; N Giles-Donovan; M Bari; Z-G Ye; J L Minns; M A Green; Guangyong Xu; P M Gehring; K Schmalzl; W D Ratcliff; C M Brown; D Chernyshov; W van Beek; S Cochran; C Stock Journal: Phys Rev Mater Date: 2019 Impact factor: 3.989
Authors: Nicholas Aristidou; Christopher Eames; Irene Sanchez-Molina; Xiangnan Bu; Jan Kosco; M Saiful Islam; Saif A Haque Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2017-05-11 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: Marina Gerhard; Boris Louis; Rafael Camacho; Aboma Merdasa; Jun Li; Alexander Kiligaridis; Alexander Dobrovolsky; Johan Hofkens; Ivan G Scheblykin Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2019-04-12 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: James Endres; David A Egger; Michael Kulbak; Ross A Kerner; Lianfeng Zhao; Scott H Silver; Gary Hodes; Barry P Rand; David Cahen; Leeor Kronik; Antoine Kahn Journal: J Phys Chem Lett Date: 2016-07-06 Impact factor: 6.475