| Literature DB >> 26878047 |
Naomi Kakushima1, Kohei Takizawa1, Masaki Tanaka1, Noboru Kawata1, Sayo Ito1, Kenichiro Imai1, Kinichi Hotta1, Kimihiro Igarashi1, Yoshihiro Kishida1, Masao Yoshida1, Hiroyuki Matsubayashi1, Hiroyuki Ono1.
Abstract
The feasibility of full-spectrum endoscopy (FUSE) esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD), providing a 245-degree field of view with double imagers on the front and left side of the endoscope was evaluated. Twenty-one healthy individuals (15 male, median age, 35 years) underwent upper gastrointestinal screening using FUSE-EGD. The primary end point was the rate of successful visualization of Vater's papilla. Secondary end points were visualization of the squamo-columnar junction (SCJ) and the anal side of the pyloric ring, and the endoscopists' subjective evaluation of usability based on maneuverability and imaging of FUSE-EGD. The mean procedure time was 6.5 min, with a median of 91 images captured. The rate of successful visualization of Vater's papilla was 90 % (19/21). The whole circumference of the SCJ was observed with two video monitors in all cases. The anterior anal side of the pyloric ring was observed in 29 % (6/21) of cases. However, the general impression of the usability of FUSE-EGD was that it was rather inferior to that of a standard front viewing endoscope. Although the usability requires further modification, FUSE-EGD provided excellent results for imaging Vater's papilla and the SCJ.Entities:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26878047 PMCID: PMC4751014 DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-109400
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Endosc Int Open ISSN: 2196-9736
Fig. 1Visualization of the 2nd portion of the duodenum on two video monitors with a clear view of Vater’s papilla.
Fig. 2Visualization of the squamo-columnar junction on the two video monitors of the FUSE-EGD system.
Qualitative assessment by five endoscopists of the full-spectrum endoscope used for esophagogastroduodenoscopy in 21 subjects.
| Qualitative aspect | Rated excellent/good/acceptable/difficult/unacceptable, % |
| General impression | Acceptable: 80 % |
| Ease of scope maneuverability | Good: 20 %, acceptable: 80 % |
| Image quality | Acceptable: 20 %, difficult: 80 % |
| Field of view | Good: 80 %, acceptable: 20 % |
| Brightness | Good: 20 %, acceptable: 60 %, difficult: 20 % |
| Waterjet irrigation | Good: 20 %, acceptable: 60 %, difficult: 20 % |
| Usability compared with standard front viewing endoscopy | Inferior: 100 % |