| Literature DB >> 26877636 |
Jung-Hoon Lee1, Jin-Ho Shin1, Jung-Min Park1, Ha-Jung Kim1, Jang-Hyuk Ahn2, Byung-Man Kwak3, Jin-Man Kim1.
Abstract
The development of a sample preparation method and optimization of the analytical instrumentation conditions were performed for the determination of the vitamin B12 content in emulsified baby foods sold on the Korea market. After removal of the milk protein and fats by chloroform extraction and centrifugation, the vitamin B12 was water extracted from the sample. Following filtration of the solution through a nylon filter, the water-soluble extract was purified by solid-phase extraction using a Liquid Chromatography Tandem Mass Spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). The solution eluted from the cartridge was dried under a stream of nitrogen gas and reconstituted with 1 mL of water. The sample solution was injected into an LC-MS/MS system after optimizing the mobile phase for vitamin B12 detection. The calibration curve showed good linearity with the coefficient of correlation (r (2)) value of 0.9999. The limit of detection was 0.03 µg/L and the limit of quantitation was 0.1 µg/L. The method of detection limit was 0.02 µg/kg. The vitamin B12 recovery from a spiking test was 99.62% for infant formula and 99.46% for cereal-based baby food. The sample preparation method developed in this study would be appropriate for the rapid determination of the vitamin B12 content in infant formula and baby foods with emulsified milk characteristics. The ability to obtain stable results more quickly and efficiently would also allow governments to exercise a more extensive quality control inspection and monitoring of products expected to contain vitamin B12. This method could be implemented in laboratories that require time and labor saving.Entities:
Keywords: Liquid Chromatography Tandem Mass Spectrometry (LC-MS/MS); Vitamin B12; analytical method; infant formula; toddler formula
Year: 2015 PMID: 26877636 PMCID: PMC4726956 DOI: 10.5851/kosfa.2015.35.6.765
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Korean J Food Sci Anim Resour ISSN: 1225-8563 Impact factor: 2.622
Liquid chromatography (LC) tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) conditions for the determination of vitamin B12 LC condition
| (a) LC condition | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Parameter | Condition | ||||||
| Column | UG120V C18 1.5×250 mm 5 μm, Shiseido | ||||||
| Detector | MS/MS | ||||||
| Mobile phase |
A: 20 mM ammonuim formate in water B: Acetonitrile ※Gradient mode | ||||||
| 0 | 95 | 5 | |||||
| 5 | 95 | 5 | |||||
| 10 | 80 | 20 | |||||
| 14 | 80 | 20 | |||||
| 15 | 20 | 80 | |||||
| 35 | 20 | 80 | |||||
| 36 | 95 | 5 | |||||
| 40 | 95 | 5 | |||||
| Flow rate | 0.2 mL/min | ||||||
| Column temperature | 35℃ | ||||||
| Run time | 40 min | ||||||
| Injection volume | 10 Ml | ||||||
| Ion source | ESI (Electro spray ionization) | ||||||
| Polarity | Positive | ||||||
| Nebulizer gas | N2 | ||||||
| Nebulizer pressure | 50 psi | ||||||
| Gas flow | 10 L/min | ||||||
| Ion spray voltage | 5000 V | ||||||
| Source temp. | 350℃ | ||||||
| Resolution | Q1(unit) Q3(unit) | ||||||
| Scan mode | MRM (Multiple reation monitoring) | ||||||
| 13.34 | Cyanocobalamin | 678 | 147 | Quantitative | 200 | 158 | 40 |
| 359 | Quantitative | 200 | 158 | 24 | |||
Fig. 1.Result of mobile phase optimization for the detection of vitamin B12.
Fig. 2.Separation of vitamin B12 standard and sample on the UG120V C18 column (5 μm, 1.5 × 250 mm; Shiseido).
Fig. 3.Effect of hydrophilic-lipophilic balance (HLB) cartridge application on vitamin B Methotrexate was used as the internal standard.
Validation factors and monitoring test for vitamin B12 in certified reference material (SRM 1849a)
| Recovery test | Tested value (mg/kg) | RSD1) (%) | Recovery (%) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SRM 1849a | 53.90±0.70 | 1.27 | 111.83±1.46 | ||||
| Samples | LC-MS/MS results (μg/kg) | μ-HPLC Results (μg/kg) | Samples | LC-MS/MS results (μg/kg) | μ-HPLC Results (μg/kg) | ||
| Infant formula (milk-based, powder) | T-1 | 62.65 | 59.87 | Toddler formula (milk-based, powder) | T-1 | 26.18 | 27.62 |
| T-2 | 34.89 | 35.82 | T-2 | 31.47 | 34.18 | ||
| T-3 | 36.57 | 35.56 | T-3 | 28.64 | 29.85 | ||
| T-4 | 28.6 | 30.15 | T-4 | 39.97 | 37.48 | ||
| T-5 | 31.83 | 30.21 | T-5 | 43.70 | 41.32 | ||
| T-6 | 34.34 | 33.64 | T-6 | 37.37 | 37.85 | ||
| T-7 | 34.35 | 33.82 | T-7 | 35.35 | 36.95 | ||
| T-8 | 35.94 | 36.49 | T-8 | 33.12 | 33.64 | ||
| T-9 | 37.5 | 38.18 | T-9 | 34.25 | 35.29 | ||
| T-10 | 31.44 | 29.87 | T-10 | 30.99 | 31.46 | ||
| T-11 | 31.71 | 30.18 | T-11 | 15.10 | 14.96 | ||
| T-12 | 20.50 | 21.64 | T-12 | 17.35 | 18.49 | ||
| T-13 | 42.31 | 41.54 | T-13 | 24.31 | 25.09 | ||
| T-14 | 44.83 | 46.24 | |||||
| T-15 | 17.35 | 18.49 | |||||
| T-16 | 24.31 | 25.09 | |||||
| LOD2) | 0.03 μg/L | r2 | 0.9986 | ||||
| LOQ3) | 0.10 μg/L | Linear Regression | y = 2737.71x − 5508.48 | ||||
| MDL4) | 0.20 μg/L | Range | 1~100 μg/L | ||||
1)RSD, relative standard deviation; 2)LOD, limit of detection; 3)LOQ, limit of quantitation; 4)MDL, method of detection limit.