Literature DB >> 26876627

Establishing school day pedometer step count cut-points using ROC curves in low-income children.

Ryan D Burns1, Timothy A Brusseau2, You Fu3, James C Hannon4.   

Abstract

Previous research has not established pedometer step count cut-points that discriminate children that meet school day physical activity recommendations using a tri-axial ActiGraph accelerometer criterion. The purpose of this study was to determine step count cut-points that associate with 30min of school day moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) in school-aged children. Participants included 1053 school-aged children (mean age=8.4±1.8years) recruited from three low-income schools from the state of Utah in the U.S. Physical activity was assessed using Yamax DigiWalker CW600 pedometers and ActiGraph wGT3X-BT triaxial accelerometers that were concurrently worn during school hours. Data were collected at each school during the 2014-2015 school year. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to determine pedometer step count cut-points that associated with at least 30min of MVPA during school hours. Cut-points were determined using the maximum Youden's J statistic (J max). For the total sample, the area-under-the-curve (AUC) was 0.77 (p<0.001) with a pedometer cut-point of 5505 steps (J max=0.46, Sensitivity=63%, Specificity=84%; Accuracy=76%). Step counts showed greater diagnostic ability in girls (AUC=0.81, p<0.001; Cut-point=5306 steps; Accuracy=78.8%) compared to boys (AUC=0.72, p<0.01; Cut-point=5786 steps; Accuracy=71.4%). Pedometer step counts showed good diagnostic ability in girls and fair diagnostic ability in boys for discriminating children that met at least 30min of MVPA during school hours.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Child; Exercise; Schools

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26876627     DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.02.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Med        ISSN: 0091-7435            Impact factor:   4.018


  7 in total

Review 1.  Temporal Trends in Children's School Day Moderate to Vigorous Physical Activity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Regression Analysis.

Authors:  Robert Glenn Weaver; Rafael M Tassitano; Maria Cecília M Tenório; Keith Brazendale; Michael W Beets
Journal:  J Phys Act Health       Date:  2021-10-09

2.  Development of Step-Count Cut Points for School-Day Vigorous Physical Activity.

Authors:  Ryan D Burns; Timothy A Brusseau; You Fu; Peng Zhang
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-03-28       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  Physical activity and sedentary time of youth in structured settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Rafael M Tassitano; R Glenn Weaver; Maria Cecília M Tenório; Keith Brazendale; Michael W Beets
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2020-12-04       Impact factor: 6.457

4.  Fit "N" Cool Kids: The Effects of Character Modeling and Goal Setting on Children's Physical Activity and Fruit and Vegetable Consumption.

Authors:  Jessyka N Larson; Timothy A Brusseau; Heidi Wengreen; Stuart J Fairclough; Maria M Newton; James C Hannon
Journal:  Clin Med Insights Pediatr       Date:  2018-06-25

5.  Validating Fitbit Zip for monitoring physical activity of children in school: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Kerli Mooses; Marek Oja; Sulev Reisberg; Jaak Vilo; Merike Kull
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2018-07-11       Impact factor: 3.295

6.  Comparison of Accelerometer-Based Cut-Points for Children's Physical Activity: Counts vs. Steps.

Authors:  Cheryl A Howe; Kimberly A Clevenger; Ryann E Leslie; Moira A Ragan
Journal:  Children (Basel)       Date:  2018-08-03

7.  Segmented School Physical Activity and Weight Status in Children: Application of Compositional Data Analysis.

Authors:  Ryan Donald Burns; Timothy A Brusseau; Yang Bai; Wonwoo Byun
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-03-21       Impact factor: 3.390

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.