| Literature DB >> 26876468 |
Jinlin Lu1, Yanhong Li1, Shengli Li1, San Ping Jiang2.
Abstract
In this article, sulfonic acid-grafted reducedEntities:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26876468 PMCID: PMC4753497 DOI: 10.1038/srep21530
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Elemental analysis, electrical conductivity and zeta potential of VC, GO, rGO and S-rGO.
| Sample | C (wt.%) | O (wt.%) | H (wt.%) | N (wt.%) | S (wt.%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VC | 98.50 | 1.24 | <0.10 | <0.10 | <0.10 | 2.1 | −24.8 |
| GO | 52.65 | 43.17 | 4.08 | <0.10 | <0.10 | 2.4 × 10−4 | −27.6 |
| rGO | 85.74 | 13.06 | 1.20 | <0.10 | <0.10 | 5.2 | −10.4 |
| S-rGO | 74.63 | 15.42 | 2.52 | 2.26 | 5.17 | 4.3 | −64.2 |
Figure 1Schematic diagram of the synthesis of S-rGO and Pt/S-rGO.
Figure 2AFM images and cross-sectional analysis of (a) GO and (b) S-rGO.
Figure 3TEM images of (a) GO and (b) S-rGO. The inset picture in the top-right part of (b) is the SAED image of S-rGO.
Figure 4(a) XPS survey scan of S-rGO, XPS high resolution scan of (b) N1s, (c) S2p and (d) C1s of S-rGO, and XPS high resolution scan of C1s of (e) rGO and (f) GO.
Figure 5FTIR curves of GO, rGO and S-rGO.
Figure 6TEM images of (a) Pt/VC and (c) Pt/S-rGO, and histograms of size distribution of Pt nanoparticles of (b) Pt/VC and (d) Pt/S-rGO. Pt loading was 20 wt.%.
Figure 7TEM images of (a) 40 wt.% Pt/S-rGO and (b) 80 wt.% Pt/S-rGO.
Figure 8CV curves of the electrocatalysts (a) in a N2-saturated 0.5 M H2SO4 solution at a scan rate of 20 mV s−1, and (b) in a N2-saturated 0.5 M H2SO4 + 1 M CH3OH solution at a scan rate of 50 mV s−1, (c) Tafel plots at a scan rate of 2 mV s−1 and (d) CA curves at 0.6 V vs. SCE for 1800 s in a N2-saturated 0.5 M H2SO4 + 1 M CH3OH solution. Pt loading was 20 wt.%. The green dotted lines in (c) were used as guide to fit the Tafel plots.
Figure 9XPS spectra of Pt4f of (a) Pt/VC, (b) Pt/rGO and (c) Pt/S-rGO.
Summary of oxidation states for Pt species of different electrocatalysts obtained from XPS analysis.
| Sample | Pt species on surface | Binding energy of Pt4f7/2(eV) | Relative intensity (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pt/VC | Pt(0) | 71.9 | 33.36 |
| Pt(II) | 72.9 | 18.31 | |
| Pt(IV) | 74.6 | 48.33 | |
| Pt/rGO | Pt(0) | 71.9 | 31.62 |
| Pt(II) | 72.7 | 28.06 | |
| Pt(IV) | 73.5 | 40.32 | |
| Pt/S-rGO | Pt(0) | 71.7 | 38.45 |
| Pt(II) | 72.6 | 27.16 | |
| Pt(IV) | 74.3 | 34.39 |
Figure 10EIS plots of the GCE and different electrocatalysts in 10 mM K3[Fe(CN)6] + 0.01 M PBS solution.
Inset is the equivalent circuit.
Comparison of current work and relevant reports on the functionalization of graphene and proposed enhancement mechanism.
| Ref. | Species and method for functionalizing graphene | Synthesis method for catalysts | Mechanism for the enhanced performance |
|---|---|---|---|
| 27 | — | Pulsed galvanostatic electrodeposition | Synergistic effects |
| 28 | — | Magnetron sputtering | Porous honeycomb-like structure; Large surface area; Enhanced interactions |
| 29 | — | Chemical reduction | Bifunctional effect between Pt NPs and remaining oxygenated groups on graphene |
| 30 | Nitrogen-doped; Chemical reduction | Chemical reduction | Smaller particle size; Modulated electronic properties of Pt |
| 31 | Boron-doped; Thermal annealing | Microwave-assisted polyol process | Uniform deposition of Pt NPs; Lower d-band center |
| 32 | Nitrogen-doped; Hydrothermal | Hydrothermal | Smaller particle size; Stronger binding energy between Pt and N-doped graphene |
| 33 | Nitrogen-doped and ZrO2-decorated; Atomic layer deposition | Chemical reduction | Unique structure |
| 34 | Nitrogen-doped; Ultrosonic cavitation assisted hydrogen implosion | Chemical reduction | Enhanced electronic conductivity; Special structure |
| Current work | Grafted with taurine molecules; One-pot method | Self-assembly | Smaller particle size and uniform distribution; Lower |