| Literature DB >> 26876092 |
J R Guest1,2,3, J Low4, K Tun4, B Wilson5, C Ng6, D Raingeard1, K E Ulstrup7, J T I Tanzil3,8, P A Todd3, T C Toh3,9, D McDougald10,11, L M Chou9, P D Steinberg2,12.
Abstract
While many studies of coral bleaching report on broad, regional scale responses, fewer examine variation in susceptibility among coral taxa and changes in community structure, before, during and after bleaching on individual reefs. Here we report in detail on the response to bleaching by a coral community on a highly disturbed reef site south of mainland Singapore before, during and after a major thermal anomaly in 2010. To estimate the capacity for resistance to thermal stress, we report on: a) overall bleaching severity during and after the event, b) differences in bleaching susceptibility among taxa during the event, and c) changes in coral community structure one year before and after bleaching. Approximately two thirds of colonies bleached, however, post-bleaching recovery was quite rapid and, importantly, coral taxa that are usually highly susceptible were relatively unaffected. Although total coral cover declined, there was no significant change in coral taxonomic community structure before and after bleaching. Several factors may have contributed to the overall high resistance of corals at this site including Symbiodinium affiliation, turbidity and heterotrophy. Our results suggest that, despite experiencing chronic anthropogenic disturbances, turbid shallow reef communities may be remarkably resilient to acute thermal stress.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26876092 PMCID: PMC4753424 DOI: 10.1038/srep20717
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Overall coral bleaching severity in June, July and October in terms of proportion (%) of colonies not bleached, moderately bleached and severely bleached (corresponding to categories 1, 2 and 3 respectively, see methods).
Proportion of colonies bleached in all taxa that were surveyed in June, July and October.
| Genus | June | July | October | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bleached (%) | n | Bleached (%) | n | Bleached (%) | n | |
| 0 | 3 | 33 | 3 | 0 | 3 | |
| 0 | 1 | 100 | 2 | 20 | 5 | |
| 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 100 | 1 | |
| 5 | 21 | 18 | 62 | 4 | 83 | |
| 6 | 17 | 20 | 10 | 0 | 14 | |
| 21 | 24 | 21 | 14 | 0 | 14 | |
| 25 | 4 | 50 | 4 | 25 | 4 | |
| 40 | 5 | 33 | 3 | 0 | 2 | |
| 46 | 54 | 35 | 43 | 8 | 25 | |
| 50 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | |
| 53 | 15 | 53 | 17 | 43 | 23 | |
| 58 | 38 | 61 | 18 | 25 | 24 | |
| 59 | 22 | 71 | 14 | 36 | 11 | |
| 60 | 20 | 62 | 26 | 20 | 25 | |
| 60 | 5 | 60 | 5 | 100 | 1 | |
| 66 | 41 | 54 | 54 | 11 | 35 | |
| 75 | 146 | 64 | 105 | 8 | 64 | |
| 75 | 12 | 83 | 12 | 33 | 12 | |
| 78 | 9 | 75 | 12 | 22 | 9 | |
| 80 | 5 | 86 | 7 | 44 | 9 | |
| 83 | 12 | 100 | 10 | 15 | 40 | |
| 83 | 6 | 60 | 5 | 29 | 7 | |
| 84 | 25 | 81 | 27 | 20 | 25 | |
| 88 | 8 | 90 | 10 | 25 | 8 | |
| 89 | 35 | 93 | 27 | 44 | 9 | |
| 89 | 54 | 76 | 41 | 33 | 27 | |
| 100 | 2 | 100 | 1 | 0 | 2 | |
| 100 | 1 | 50 | 2 | 0 | 3 | |
| 100 | 6 | 100 | 2 | 100 | 3 | |
| 100 | 3 | 100 | 2 | 100 | 2 | |
*Additional surveys of Acropora in July and October were carried out by random swims to increase number of colonies surveyed.
†This genus was formerly Favia.
Figure 2Proportion (%) of colonies not bleached (black bars), moderately bleached (gray bars) and severely bleached (white bars) for all genera that had at least 5 colonies surveyed on all three survey occasions.
*This genus was formerly Favia.
Proportion of colonies of different genera exhibiting partial colony mortality.
| Partial mortality category | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Genus | n | None | 1–10% | 11–25% | 26–50% | 51–75% | 76–100% |
| 1 | 0 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 20 | 20 | 20 | 60 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 3 | 33 | 0 | 0 | 67 | 0 | 0 | |
| 67 | 40 | 4 | 39 | 16 | 0 | 0 | |
| 13 | 54 | 31 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 0 | |
| 80 | 64 | 5 | 13 | 16 | 3 | 0 | |
| 17 | 65 | 18 | 18 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 17 | 65 | 29 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 3 | 67 | 33 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 4 | 75 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 25 | 0 | |
| 22 | 77 | 5 | 18 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 26 | 81 | 4 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 24 | 83 | 8 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0 | |
| 9 | 89 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 28 | 96 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | |
*This genus was formerly Favia.
Figure 3Bleaching at Pulau Satumu in July 2010.
(a) healthy colony of Acropora tenuis next to severely bleached colony of Montipora, (b) healthy colony of A. tenuis next to severely bleached colony of Platygyra sp., (c) healthy colony of A. hyacinthus with severely and partially bleached massive and encrusting corals, (d) severely (left) and partially (right) bleached colonies of Pocillopora damicornis, (e) severly bleached colony of Porites (massive) and (f) partial mortality and disease in bleached colony of Montipora sp. Photos: JR Guest.