| Literature DB >> 26876022 |
Susan C Fitzer1, Peter Chung1, Francesco Maccherozzi2, Sarnjeet S Dhesi2, Nicholas A Kamenos1, Vernon R Phoenix1, Maggie Cusack1.
Abstract
Biomineral production in marine organisms employs transient phases of amorphous calcium carbonate (ACC) in the construction of crystalline shells. Increasing seawater pCO2 leads to ocean acidification (OA) with a reduction in oceanic carbonate concentration which could have a negative impact on shell formation and therefore survival. We demonstrate significant changes in the hydrated and dehydrated forms of ACC in the aragonite and calcite layers of Mytilus edulis shells cultured under acidification conditions (1000 μatm pCO2) compared to present day conditions (380 μatm pCO2). In OA conditions, Mytilus edulis has more ACC at crystalisation sites. Here, we use the high-spatial resolution of synchrotron X-ray Photo Emission Electron Microscopy (XPEEM) combined with X-ray Absorption Spectroscopy (XAS) to investigate the influence of OA on the ACC formation in the shells of adult Mytilus edulis. Electron Backscatter Diffraction (EBSD) confirms that OA reduces crystallographic control of shell formation. The results demonstrate that OA induces more ACC formation and less crystallographic control in mussels suggesting that ACC is used as a repair mechanism to combat shell damage under OA. However, the resultant reduced crystallographic control in mussels raises concerns for shell protective function under predation and changing environments.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26876022 PMCID: PMC4753494 DOI: 10.1038/srep21076
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1(a) Secondary electron emission EBSD image of adult Mytilus edulis shell grown under present day conditions (380 µatm pCO2) showing the calcite (upper half) and aragonite (lower half) and areas analysed. The field of view (FOV) is 50 µm. The coloured circles indicate representative areas where XPEEM images were taken for (b) the outer calcite, (c) the interface calcite (upper half) and interface aragonite (lower half) and (d) inner aragonite. The FOV in each XPEEM image is (b) 20 µm, (c) 20 µm and (d) 20 µm. The image in (c) was taken with a higher resolution than the images shown in (b) and (d).
Figure 2XAS spectra across the Ca L2,3-edge of Mytilus edulis shell grown under present day conditions for (a) the outer calcite, (b) the interface calcite, (c) the interface aragonite and (d) inner aragonite area. The colour of the present day (380 μatm pCO2) solid line corresponds to the area with the same colour circle in Fig. 1. The spectra for each region of the shell grown under OA (1000 μatm pCO2) conditions are shown as the solid black line in each panel. The spectra have been overlaid to highlight the increased ACC presence in shells grown under OA in the areas determined to be calcite and aragonite by XPEEM and EBSD. The six features in the XAS spectra are labelled 1–6. The solid vertical line in (a) indicates the position of the lower energy shoulder indicative of ACC. The dashed vertical line in (a) indicates the position of the peak that increases intensity from the outer calcite to the inner aragonite layer.
Figure 3EBSD analysis of mussel shells grown under (a) present day (380 μatm pCO2) and (b) OA (1000 μatm pCO2) conditions. Images present a cross section of the shell from outer calcite (upper area) to the inner aragonite (lower area) for a, (i) diffraction intensity map (DI), (ii) crystallographic orientation map (orientation) according to colour key, [0001] plots are for calcite and [001] plots are for aragonite., (iii) phase map where calcite is shown in red and aragonite in green. Inverse pole figures (IPF) on the right correspond to the crystallographic orientation maps in (ii) using the IPF colour key to indicate strength of CPO or texture. The growth direction of the shells are from left to right in the sections and the IPFs are plotted normal to that view.