| Literature DB >> 26875750 |
Elisa Korenblum1, Diego Javier Jiménez1, Jan Dirk van Elsas1.
Abstract
Anaerobic bacteria degrade lignocellulose in various anoxic and organically rich environments, often in a syntrophic process. Anaerobic enrichments of bacterial communities on a recalcitrant lignocellulose source were studied combining polymerase chain reaction-denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis, amplicon sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene and culturing. Three consortia were constructed using the microbiota of lake sediment as the starting inoculum and untreated switchgrass (Panicum virgatum) (acid or heat) or treated (with either acid or heat) as the sole source of carbonaceous compounds. Additionally, nitrate was used in order to limit sulfate reduction and methanogenesis. Bacterial growth took place, as evidenced from 3 to 4 log unit increases in the 16S rRNA gene copy numbers as well as direct cell counts through three transfers on cleaned and reused substrate placed in fresh mineral medium. After 2 days, Aeromonas bestiarum-like organisms dominated the enrichments, irrespective of the substrate type. One month later, each substrate revealed major enrichments of organisms affiliated with different species of Clostridium. Moreover, only the heat-treated substrate selected Dysgonomonas capnocytophagoides-affiliated bacteria (Bacteroidetes). Towards the end of the experiment, members of the Proteobacteria (Aeromonas, Rhizobium and/or Serratia) became dominant in all three types of substrates. A total of 160 strains was isolated from the enrichments. Most of the strains tested (78%) were able to grow anaerobically on carboxymethyl cellulose and xylan. The final consortia yield attractive biological tools for the depolymerization of recalcitrant lignocellulosic materials and are proposed for the production of precursors of biofuels.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26875750 PMCID: PMC4767288 DOI: 10.1111/1751-7915.12338
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microb Biotechnol ISSN: 1751-7915 Impact factor: 5.813
Figure 1Bacterial cell counts (lines) and 16S rRNA gene copies (bars) of enriched cultures..
16S rRNA amplicon libraries after quality control
| Sediment | USG | ASG | HSG | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B | 1st | 2nd | 3rd | B | 1st | 2nd | 3rd | B | 1st | 2nd | 3rd | ||
| No. of sequences (min–max) | 18 944 | 1241–1692 | 639–1417 | 1040–1929 | 1368–2801 | 4208–4518 | 1749–2304 | 2428–2631 | 1902–3893 | 914–1256 | 817–2373 | 2073–2394 | 1067–3124 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| PD | 8.43 | 1.53 | 1.75 | 1.66 | 1.64 | 1.17 | 1.63 | 1.34 | 0.94 | 1.99 | 2.23 | 2.4 | 1.51 |
| Chao‐1 | 188.68 | 40.94 | 57.55 | 39.58 | 45.61 | 63.33 | 51.46 | 51.11 | 32.00 | 59.83 | 44.50 | 36.30 | 38.56 |
Figure 2PCoA ordination plot shows relatedness of all samples over time using unweighted UniFrac distance of classified 16S rRNA gene sequence (0.97 similarity). PCoA of sample distances shows principal coordinate 1 (PC1) and principal coordinate 2 (PC2) with a total of 35% of variation explained. The right small panels depict the PCoA ordination of sediment sample with samples USG, ASG or HGS separately.
Figure 3A. Relative abundance at phylum (first graph) and family levels based on 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing in each consortia over time.
B. Heat map of the relative abundance of the 10 most abundant OTUs composing more than 1% differently enriched in samples (ANOVA, FDR, P < 0.05).
(Hemi)cellulose degrading bacteria: growth on glucose, fructose, CMC and xylan of selected isolates under anoxic conditions
| Isolate strains | Identification (blast) | Growth | (Growth/activity) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Glucose 0.2% | Fructose 0.2% | CMC 0.2% | Xilan 0.2% | |||
| USG_B | Ci7 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Ci11 |
|
|
|
|
| |
| Ci23 |
|
|
|
|
| |
| Ci18 |
|
|
|
|
| |
| Ci9 |
|
|
|
|
| |
| USG_3 | cBf1 |
|
|
|
|
|
| cBf13 |
|
|
|
|
| |
| CCf1 |
|
|
|
|
| |
| ASG_B | ai10 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ai17 |
|
|
|
|
| |
| ai18 |
|
|
|
|
| |
| ai22 |
|
|
|
|
| |
| ai7 |
|
|
|
|
| |
| ai9 |
|
|
|
|
| |
| ai8 |
|
|
|
|
| |
| ai3 |
|
|
|
|
| |
| ai4 |
|
|
|
|
| |
| ai13 |
|
|
|
|
| |
| ai14 |
|
|
|
|
| |
| ai19 |
|
|
|
|
| |
| ai2 |
|
|
|
|
| |
| ai21 |
|
|
|
|
| |
| ai1 |
|
|
|
|
| |
| ai5 |
|
|
|
|
| |
| ai6 |
|
|
|
|
| |
| ASG_3 | aBf15 |
|
|
|
|
|
| aBf6 |
|
|
|
|
| |
| aAf1 |
|
|
|
|
| |
| aAf3 |
|
|
|
|
| |
| aCf11 |
|
|
|
|
| |
| aCf13 |
|
|
|
|
| |
| aBf10 |
|
|
|
|
| |
| aBf12 |
|
|
|
|
| |
| aBf30 |
|
|
|
|
| |
| HSG_B | Hi10 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Hi15 |
|
|
|
|
| |
| Hi24 |
|
|
|
|
| |
| Hi4 |
|
|
|
|
| |
| Hi6 |
|
|
|
|
| |
| HSG_3 | HBf5 |
|
|
|
|
|
| HBf8 |
|
|
|
|
| |
| HA18 |
|
|
|
|
| |
| HB15 |
|
|
|
|
| |
| HCf7 |
|
|
|
|
| |
| HA10 |
|
|
|
|
| |
| HA24 |
|
|
|
|
| |
| HB1 |
|
|
|
|
| |
| HC10 |
|
|
|
|
| |
| HCf16 |
|
|
|
|
| |
| HA9 |
|
|
|
|
| |
(+) indicates positive growth or halo of degradation of CMC or xylan; (−) indicates no growth; (W) indicates weak growth.