Literature DB >> 26875750

Succession of lignocellulolytic bacterial consortia bred anaerobically from lake sediment.

Elisa Korenblum1, Diego Javier Jiménez1, Jan Dirk van Elsas1.   

Abstract

Anaerobic bacteria degrade lignocellulose in various anoxic and organically rich environments, often in a syntrophic process. Anaerobic enrichments of bacterial communities on a recalcitrant lignocellulose source were studied combining polymerase chain reaction-denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis, amplicon sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene and culturing. Three consortia were constructed using the microbiota of lake sediment as the starting inoculum and untreated switchgrass (Panicum virgatum) (acid or heat) or treated (with either acid or heat) as the sole source of carbonaceous compounds. Additionally, nitrate was used in order to limit sulfate reduction and methanogenesis. Bacterial growth took place, as evidenced from 3 to 4 log unit increases in the 16S rRNA gene copy numbers as well as direct cell counts through three transfers on cleaned and reused substrate placed in fresh mineral medium. After 2 days, Aeromonas bestiarum-like organisms dominated the enrichments, irrespective of the substrate type. One month later, each substrate revealed major enrichments of organisms affiliated with different species of Clostridium. Moreover, only the heat-treated substrate selected Dysgonomonas capnocytophagoides-affiliated bacteria (Bacteroidetes). Towards the end of the experiment, members of the Proteobacteria (Aeromonas, Rhizobium and/or Serratia) became dominant in all three types of substrates. A total of 160 strains was isolated from the enrichments. Most of the strains tested (78%) were able to grow anaerobically on carboxymethyl cellulose and xylan. The final consortia yield attractive biological tools for the depolymerization of recalcitrant lignocellulosic materials and are proposed for the production of precursors of biofuels.
© 2016 The Authors. Microbial Biotechnology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd and Society for Applied Microbiology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26875750      PMCID: PMC4767288          DOI: 10.1111/1751-7915.12338

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Microb Biotechnol        ISSN: 1751-7915            Impact factor:   5.813


Introduction

Lignocellulose is naturally depolymerized by enzymes of microbial communities that develop in soil as well as in sediments of lakes and rivers (van der Lelie et al., 2012). Sediments in organically rich environments are usually waterlogged and anoxic, already within a centimetre or less of the sediment water interface. Therefore, much of the organic detritus is probably degraded by anaerobic processes in such systems (Benner et al., 1984). Whereas fungi are well‐known lignocellulose degraders in toxic conditions, due to their oxidative enzymes (Wang et al., 2013), in anoxic environments bacteria may be the main plant biomass degraders. Lignocellulose feedstocks, such as agricultural and forest residues, can be used to produce a wide range of value‐added bioproducts (e.g. biogas, enzymes, antioxidants) and biofuels (Bhatia et al., 2012; Peacock et al., 2013). Current approaches that use lignocellulose waste for biofuel production are still economically nonviable and hence improvement in biodegradation rates is dearly needed (Banerjee et al., 2010). The structure of lignocellulose, which is mainly composed of cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin (Bhatia et al., 2012), represents a constraint for its biodegradability. Lignin is very stable and it also ties/shields off the polysaccharide chains, which explains the recalcitrance of lignocellulose to bioconversion. Previous studies have shown that (chemical and/or physical) pretreatment increases lignocellulose breakdown, by loosening the bonds between the lignin and the polysaccharide moieties, to such an extent that the glycoside bonds are easier accessed by enzymes (Ahring and Westermann, 2007; Kumar and Murthy, 2011). The use of bacterial consortia able to degrade (hemicellulose), with a focus on anaerobic ones, appears to represent a viable strategy to enhance biodegradation rates. However, and rather surprisingly, studies on the structure and composition of lignocellulolytic communities are rarely conduct under anoxic conditions. A study of switchgrass‐degrading anaerobic bacteria, enriched from tropical forest soils, revealed dominant organisms to consist of members of the Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes and Alphaproteobacteria (DeAngelis et al., 2012). Another study, which enriched bacteria from sugarcane bagasse compost under aerobic (static) conditions, revealed the co‐occurrence of two dominant anaerobic genera, Clostridium and Thermoanaerobacterium, together with aerobic bacilli next to as‐yet‐uncultured bacteria (Wongwilaiwalin et al., 2010). Previous studies have also enriched microorganisms on different plant biomass along successive transfers (Brossi et al., 2015; Porsch et al., 2015). For instance, some of these enrichments were designed to favour anaerobic fermentation (methanogenesis) with the concomitant production of biomethane from pretreated wheat straw (Sträuber et al., 2015). However, the improvement might be limited to initial stages of degradation using a single bacterial culture, and the (hemi)cellulose degradation rate of pretreated lignocellulose decreases along consecutive transfers (He et al., 2013). To overcome biomass recalcitrance to degradation, applications of mixed bacterial cultures, in which succession takes place, is likely critical to the biodegradation of complex polymers (Fierer et al., 2010). In order to enhance the prevalence of degraders and boost bacterial succession, in this study, recalcitrance was addressed by reusing (i.e. recycling) lignocellulose in consecutive transfers of anaerobic bacterial consortia. We established three consortia consisting of anaerobically growing bacteria bred from lake sediment on treated (HSG and ASG) or untreated switchgrass (USG) as the sole sources of carbon and energy. The three enrichment cultures were designed to allow anaerobic respiration by nitrate reduction given the added potassium nitrate. The presence of the strong electron acceptor nitrate apparently will not strongly inhibit fermentative metabolism, but it does preclude methanogenesis and sulfate reduction (Chen et al., 2008; Oren, 2009). The dynamics of the phylogenetic composition and abundance of the bacterial communities developing on the recalcitrant biomass is described. In addition, we confirmed the (hemi)cellulolytic activities of isolated members of the communities, which were able to grow anaerobically on carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) and xylan.

Results

Establishment of lignocellulose substrate‐adapted bacterial consortia

Bacterial growth took place in the three successive transfers in the media containing USG, ASG and HSG as the sole carbon source, as well as in the second and third transfers where lignocellulosic substrates were reused (Fig. 1). Two to three log unit increases of cell densities were evidenced by total microscopic cell counts as well as qPCR of the 16S rRNA gene after 2 days (denoted ‘Beginning’) and 1 month of the first transfer. Density increases were also detected when the partially biodegraded switchgrass from the first transfer was reused for the second and third transfers. During 1 month of anaerobic incubation, no growth was observed in blank (control) flasks (without substrate) after the successive transfers (data not shown). Denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) profiles of the PCR‐amplified 16S rRNA gene revealed that diverse bacterial communities had been enriched by the three treatments from the lake sediment inoculum. Moreover, the consortia changed over time in all differentially treated systems (Fig. S1). The PCR‐DGGE profiles formed well‐defined clusters with high similarity among replicates, as confirmed by a permutation test (P < 0.05).
Figure 1

Bacterial cell counts (lines) and 16S rRNA gene copies (bars) of enriched cultures..

Bacterial cell counts (lines) and 16S rRNA gene copies (bars) of enriched cultures..

Succession of bacterial taxa growing on lignocellulose substrate under anoxic conditions

Amplicon pyrosequencing (based on the bacterial 16S rRNA gene) of consortium DNA of the three replicate USG, ASG and HSG samples at four time points produced a total of 71 305 reads (mean: 1981 per sample, range 639–4518) after quality trimming, while the sediment sample yielded 18 944 cleaned reads (Table 1). Rarefaction analysis suggested that the coverage of the respective consortia was generally sufficient (Fig. S2). Analysis of all sequences across all bacterial enrichment cultures over time revealed the presence of a total of 724 operational taxonomic units (OTUs) (97% nucleotide identity cut‐off), while the original sediment sample showed the presence of 1125 OTUs (Table 1, Table S1). Only 53 OTUs were shared among all enriched consortia (Fig. S3).
Table 1

16S rRNA amplicon libraries after quality control

SedimentUSGASGHSG
B1st2nd3rdB1st2nd3rdB1st2nd3rd
No. of sequences (min–max)18 9441241–1692639–14171040–19291368–28014208–45181749–23042428–26311902–3893914–1256817–23732073–23941067–3124
OTUS 1125 195 126 158 150 200 184 141 114 194 164 166 96
PD8.431.531.751.661.641.171.631.340.941.992.232.41.51
Chao‐1188.6840.9457.5539.5845.6163.3351.4651.1132.0059.8344.5036.3038.56
16S rRNA amplicon libraries after quality control Faith's phylogenetic diversity (PD) and Chao richness (Chao‐1) estimators changed in all three enrichment cultures over time (Table 1; Fig. S4). The HSG systems revealed the highest PD values at the first and second transfers. Thus, particular bacterial populations were consistently selected throughout the transfers and the consortia encompassed phylogenetically more related species over time. Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) of unweighted pairwise UniFrac distances between samples depicted a similar pattern of distribution along PC1 and PC2 (35% of variation explained), clustering the bacterial consortia over time (Fig. 2). However, the pairwise analysis of similarity (ANOSIM) testing of the unweighted pairwise UniFrac distances confirm that substrate pretreatment was a key factor driving consortium dissimilarity over time (R = 0.6676; P < 0.0001; Table S2).
Figure 2

PCoA ordination plot shows relatedness of all samples over time using unweighted UniFrac distance of classified 16S rRNA gene sequence (0.97 similarity). PCoA of sample distances shows principal coordinate 1 (PC1) and principal coordinate 2 (PC2) with a total of 35% of variation explained. The right small panels depict the PCoA ordination of sediment sample with samples USG, ASG or HGS separately.

PCoA ordination plot shows relatedness of all samples over time using unweighted UniFrac distance of classified 16S rRNA gene sequence (0.97 similarity). PCoA of sample distances shows principal coordinate 1 (PC1) and principal coordinate 2 (PC2) with a total of 35% of variation explained. The right small panels depict the PCoA ordination of sediment sample with samples USG, ASG or HGS separately. Taxonomic analysis of the communities demonstrated the dominance of organisms from five phyla in all samples, i.e. Proteobacteria, Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, Actinobacteria and Acidobacteria. Proteobacteria and Firmicutes accounted for most of the sequences, representing 96, 99 and 67% of all sequences in the USG, ASG and HSG systems, respectively (Fig. 3A). In addition, Bacteroidetes were highly enriched (31%) in HSG. At lower taxonomic rankings, OTUs belonging to Actinobacteria and Acidobacteria had less than 2% relative abundance across all consortia. The bacterial families found to dominate the switchgrass consortia were minorities in the sediment community (Table S3). The dominating Porphyromonadaceae (Bacteroidetes) and Rhizobiaceae (Alphaproteobacteria) occurred at 0.3 and 0.16%, respectively, whereas Lachnospiraceae, Carnobacteriaceae (Firmicutes), Aeromonadaceae and Enterobacteriaceae (Gammaproteobacteria) represented less than 0.1% of the total sediment bacterial community (Fig. 3A; Table S3). In the ‘beginning’, all consortia were dominated by Gammaproteobacteria, with sequences related to Aeromonadaceae amounting to ca. 90% (Fig. 3A; Table S3). Two OTUs (OTU_112 and OTU_171; Fig. 3B), identified as Aeromonas bestiarum, were significantly enriched, OTU_112 representing 38–87% of reads in ASG consortia in the beginning and in the end of the first transfer, and OTU_171 >50% of total reads in the beginning of USG and HSG consortia [analysis of variance (ANOVA), P < 0.05, false discovery rate (FDR)]. As the consortia developed in the second transfer, a shift to different families of Firmicutes (Lachnospiraceae) was noted in ASG and USG, while in HSG Firmicutes (Ruminococcaceae) and Bacteroidetes (Porphyromonadaceae) dominated. The OTU_595 identified as Dysgonomonas capnocytophagoides was highly enriched in HSG only, while the OTU_322, identified as Clostridium saccharolyticum, was strongly associated with samples USG and ASG (ANOVA, P < 0.05, FDR). Each of these OTUs represented >50% of the reads per sample. At the end of the third transfer, a dominance of Gammaproteobacteria was found across all three consortia. The OTU_302, identified as Rhizobium huautlense, was significantly enriched in the USG and HSG consortia, and the OTU_249, affiliated with Serratia fonticola, was predominant in ASG consortia (ANOVA, P < 0.05, FDR).
Figure 3

A. Relative abundance at phylum (first graph) and family levels based on 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing in each consortia over time.

B. Heat map of the relative abundance of the 10 most abundant OTUs composing more than 1% differently enriched in samples (ANOVA, FDR, P < 0.05).

A. Relative abundance at phylum (first graph) and family levels based on 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing in each consortia over time. B. Heat map of the relative abundance of the 10 most abundant OTUs composing more than 1% differently enriched in samples (ANOVA, FDR, P < 0.05). Some sequences of the libraries were only identified as belonging to the domain Bacteria in USG (2538 reads, 15.6%), ASG (680 reads, 1.9%) and HSG (2897 reads, 15.6%); these represented ca. one‐third of all OTUs of the three consortia (254 OTUs).

Isolation and characterization of (hemi)cellulolytic bacterial strains

Colonies with different morphologies detected after 48 h of growth at 25°C under anaerobic conditions from the plated samples of the USG‐, ASG‐ and USG‐adapted consortia were selected. Thus 42, 69 and 49 bacterial strains were obtained, respectively (total of 160 isolates, Table S4), and their 16S rRNA gene sequence determined (Table S5). Analyses using BLAST‐N revealed, across all isolates, similarities of more than 97% to sequences from known bacteria. Fourteen bacterial species were identified in total, with five being highly abundant in the 16S rRNA amplicon libraries when OTUs were identified with BLAST‐N using the NCBI database (Tables S6 and S7), i.e. A. bestiarum, Clostridium algidixylanolyticum, C. saccharolyticum, Clostridium xylanolyticum and D. capnocytophagoides. Moreover, the remaining strains were also found in the amplicon libraries, in lower amounts (Ensifer adhaerens, Rhizobium daejeonense, Serratia proteamaculans, Sporotalea propionica, Actinotalea fermentans) or they remained undetected (Clostridium beijerinckii, Cellulomonas cellasea, Isoptericola hypogeus and Pseudoclavibacter soli). Fifty bacterial strains were randomly taken to test their abilities to grow on cellulose and (hemi)celluloses using CMC and xylan from beechwood as the carbon sources in minimal medium agar under anoxic conditions. A total of 39 isolates (78%) were found to grow on both substrates, producing a degradation halo around the colony, as evidenced by iodine staining (Table 2; Fig. S6). Twenty‐three isolates belonging to Firmicutes, five S. propionica and 18 Clostridium isolates, could grow on CMC and xylan. Among the 14 Proteobacteria that degraded (hemi)cellulose, five were A. bestiarum, seven E. adhaerens and two S. proteamaculans isolates. One out of four actinobacteria, identified as C. cellasea, was able to grow on these substrates. Finally, one out of three Bacteroidetes, i.e. D. capnocytophagoides, grew on cellulose and (hemi)cellulose (Table 2).
Table 2

(Hemi)cellulose degrading bacteria: growth on glucose, fructose, CMC and xylan of selected isolates under anoxic conditions

Isolate strainsIdentification (blast)Growth(Growth/activity)
Glucose 0.2%Fructose 0.2%CMC 0.2%Xilan 0.2%
USG_BCi7 Clostridium algidixylanolyticum + + (+/+) (+/+)
Ci11 Clostridium saccharolyticum + + (+/+) (+/+)
Ci23 Clostridium saccharolyticum + + (+/+) (+/+)
Ci18 Clostridium xylanolyticum + + (+/+) (+/+)
Ci9 Clostridium xylanolyticum + + (+/+) (+/+)
USG_3cBf1 Clostridium saccharolyticum + + (+/+) (+/+)
cBf13 Clostridium saccharolyticum + + (+/+) (+/+)
CCf1 Clostridium saccharolyticum + + (+/+) (+/+)
ASG_Bai10 Aeromonas bestiarum + + (+/+) (+/+)
ai17 Aeromonas bestiarum + + (+/+) (+/+)
ai18 Aeromonas bestiarum + + (+/+) (+/+)
ai22 Aeromonas bestiarum + + (+/+) (+/+)
ai7 Aeromonas bestiarum + + (+/+) (+/+)
ai9 Aeromonas bestiarum W (−/−) (−/−)
ai8 Clostridium algidixylanolyticum + + (+/+) (+/+)
ai3 Clostridium beijerinckii + + (+/+) (+/+)
ai4 Clostridium beijerinckii + + (+/+) (+/+)
ai13 Clostridium xylanolyticum + + (+/+) (+/+)
ai14 Clostridium xylanolyticum W (−/−) (−/−)
ai19 Clostridium xylanolyticum + + (+/+) (+/+)
ai2 Serratia proteamaculans + + (+/+) (+/+)
ai21 Serratia proteamaculans + + (+/+) (+/+)
ai1 Sporotalea propionica + + (+/+) (+/+)
ai5 Sporotalea propionica W (−/−) (−/−)
ai6 Sporotalea propionica + + (+/+) (+/+)
ASG_3aBf15 Cellulomonas cellasea + + (+/+) (+/+)
aBf6 Cellulomonas cellasea W (−/−) (−/−)
aAf1 Clostridium saccharolyticum + + (+/+) (+/+)
aAf3 Clostridium xylanolyticum + + (+/+) (+/+)
aCf11 Clostridium xylanolyticum + + (+/+) (+/+)
aCf13 Clostridium xylanolyticum W (−/−) (−/−)
aBf10 Ensifer adhaerens + + (+/+) (+/+)
aBf12 Ensifer adhaerens + + (+/+) (+/+)
aBf30 Ensifer adhaerens + + (+/+) (+/+)
HSG_BHi10 Clostridium algidixylanolyticum + + (+/+) (+/+)
Hi15 Clostridium saccharolyticum + + (+/+) (+/+)
Hi24 Sporotalea propionica + + (+/+) (+/+)
Hi4 Sporotalea propionica + + (+/+) (+/+)
Hi6 Sporotalea propionica W (−/−) (−/−)
HSG_3HBf5 Actinotalea fermentans W (−/−) (−/−)
HBf8 Actinotalea fermentans W (−/−) (−/−)
HA18 Dysgonomonas capnocytophagoides W (−/−) (−/−)
HB15 Dysgonomonas capnocytophagoides + + (+/+) (+/+)
HCf7 Dysgonomonas capnocytophagoides W (−/−) (−/−)
HA10 Ensifer adhaerens + + (+/+) (+/+)
HA24 Ensifer adhaerens + + (+/+) (+/+)
HB1 Ensifer adhaerens + + (+/+) (+/+)
HC10 Ensifer adhaerens + + (+/+) (+/+)
HCf16 Isoptericola hypogeus W (−/−) (−/−)
HA9 Sporotalea propionica + + (+/+) (+/+)

(+) indicates positive growth or halo of degradation of CMC or xylan; (−) indicates no growth; (W) indicates weak growth.

(Hemi)cellulose degrading bacteria: growth on glucose, fructose, CMC and xylan of selected isolates under anoxic conditions (+) indicates positive growth or halo of degradation of CMC or xylan; (−) indicates no growth; (W) indicates weak growth.

Discussion

The production of sugar monomers from lignocellulose substrate requires pretreatment of feedstock due to its recalcitrance to microbial degradation (Guo et al., 2011). Therefore, in this study, we assessed the dynamics of bacterial taxa in three enrichment cultures bred from a sediment sample on untreated, heat‐ or acid‐treated switchgrass (denoted as USG, HSG and ASG, respectively) under anoxic conditions. These substrates were recycled in consecutive transfers and the bacterial successions over three transfers were assessed on the basis of PCR‐DGGE as well as bacterial 16S rRNA pyrosequencing. Given that a large fraction of natural microbial communities is not detected using culture‐dependent techniques (Staley and Konopka, 1985), we opted for these direct molecular approaches. Combination of these with cultivation might also shed light on initially ‘rare’ organisms (Pedrós‐Alió, 2012). Interestingly, the sequencing data revealed that a suite of bacteria that were in low RA (0.6%) in the sediment did grow in the experimental systems (Fig. 3, Table S2). In the USG, ASG and HSG systems, such organisms overwhelmed the populations that were initially abundant in the sediment. Our conditions were set so as to favour the use of nitrate as the terminal electron acceptor, to the detriment of that of iron, manganese, sulfate or fermentation and the production of methane (Londry and Suflita, 1999). Clearly, in natural sediments, methane is often produced from lignocellulose as the major final product upon depletion of electron acceptors such as nitrate, iron, manganese and sulfate (Ahring and Westermann, 2007). The reasoning to exclude these groups was based on the potential to use the bacterial consortia that were bred for bioethanol production, in which case the presence of sulfide and methane would be undesirable. However, some bacteria performing fermentative metabolism may have been favoured by the three switchgrass enrichments. In the first transfer, disregarding the substrate used in the enrichment, the most dominant OTUs were related to A. bestiarum, which might have grown on lignocellulose (either treated or untreated) by anaerobic respiration with nitrate. Consistent with this assumption is the fact that genes encoding nitrate (and nitrite) reductases are often present in the core genome of members of the genus Aeromonas in MetaRef (clade 1231; Huang et al., 2014) and the reference genome of the A. bestiarum species in RefSeq collection of NCBI (protein table 16435_217332). Moreover, the A. bestiarum strains obtained were able to grow on xylan and CMC; these activities presumably allowed their growth at the beginning on fresh untreated and pretreated substrates. In this study, substrate recycling was applied to strongly select for bacterial consortia that are best able to perform degradation, establishing the type of degradation dynamics found in nature (Peacock et al., 2013). After the first switchgrass breakdown step, the dominant OTUs were related to C. saccharolyticum (in USG and ASG) and D. capnocytophagoides (in HSG), indicating a change of metabolic status in the enrichments. Here, one might surmise that fermentative processes became more dominant as compared with anaerobic respiration with nitrate. The relative dominance of these species may also indicate their proneness to ‘work’ under the conditions applied (i.e. already partially degraded substrate), under which they flourish, with the levels of nitrate present (Murray, 1986). The community structures of these consortia were influenced by the carbon source, being the HSG cultures more diverse than the USG and ASG ones. The bacterial populations, at the highest taxonomic level, showed shifts, with members of the Proteobacteria (mainly A. bestiarum) alternating with those of the Firmicutes on USG and ASG; or Bacteroidetes in the HSG consortia. Bacteroidetes were found with high frequency in the HSG consortia only, indicating the competitiveness of this group in HSG systems. During thermal processes, both hemicellulose and lignin are solubilized, which may release easily degradable compounds such as acetate, formate, next to furfural (Trifonova et al., 2008; Hendriks and Zeeman, 2009). Previously, we showed that Bacteroidetes may also play a role in furfural uptake (Jiménez et al., 2014). Substances released during the heat treatment might be at the basis of the difference in the bacterial consortia in HSG from the USG or ASG. In contrast, acid pretreatment mainly solubilizes hemicellulose, which could explain that the USG‐ and ASG‐adapted cultures shared similar phylogenetic traits. Recently, we (Jiménez et al., 2014) assessed aerobic soil‐derived microbial consortia bred on heat‐treated and untreated wheat straw as the lignocellulosic source material. PCR‐DGGE applied to these systems showed that substrate pretreatment did affect the bacterial and fungal consortia that were selected. Members of the consortia related to C. saccharolyticum or D. capnocytophagoides degraded the recalcitrant biomass, and then, at the third transfer, OTUs related to Serratia and Rhizobium dominated the enrichment cultures. These bacteria were, thus, mainly active on the switchgrass, previously ASG and HSG, which were already partially degraded. Members of Serratia and Rhizobium occur typically in systems such as the rhizosphere (Wang et al., 1998; Carneiro et al., 2013), where cellulases or hemicellulases may be important for survival; both types are nitrate reducers. To a lesser extent, Actinobacteria were found in the three enrichments. Thirteen isolates were obtained, and these were affiliated with A. fermentans, C. cellasea, I. hypogeus and P. soli. These phyla are frequently found in cellulolytic processes, such as in compost, soil and the termite hindgut (Warnecke et al., 2007; DeAngelis et al., 2011; Sizova et al., 2011). Finally, given the fact that fungi are regarded as the main decomposers of plant residues under aerobic conditions (Bugg et al., 2011), we assessed their presence by PCR of the ITS1 region. This only yielded evidence for fungal presence in the ASG adapted consortia only after the first transfer (data not shown). Thus, the degradation of switchgrass under anaerobiosis such as applied by us was indeed mainly orchestrated by bacterial consortia that act by anaerobic respiration and/or fermentation. A shift in dominance from A. bestiarum to C. saccharolyticum or D. capnocytophagoides and then to R. huautlense or S. fonticola was found, and this is tentatively related to the progressively increasing recalcitrance of the substrate. In addition, when the switchgrass is pretreated by heat, D. capnocytophagoides plays an important role in the resulting consortium. Thus, consortia consisting of degraders with different energy generation strategies (fermentation and nitrate reduction) were constructed, which potentially relates to different enzymatic batteries and efficiencies. Concerning application, synthetic microbial communities that lack sugar monomer scavengers need to be formulated using the isolates obtained and evaluated in a bioreactor as to the metabolic efficiencies in polymer deconstruction.

Experimental procedures

Lignocellulose material and sediment sampling

Air‐dried switchgrass were cut into pieces of 2 cm in length. Then, 20 g of this material was used to acid and heat pretreatments. The acid treatment was performed by soaking the biomass in 500 ml of 1 M acetic acid under static condition at room temperature for 24 h, then washed with tap water until it reach a neutral pH and oven‐dried (Guo et al., 2011). The heat treatment was conducted by the torrefaction of the biomass at 200°C for 1h (Trifonova et al., 2008). USG‐, ASG‐ and HSG‐treated biomasses were ball milled into 2 mm of fibres. These lignocellulosic substrates were added separately as carbon source in mineral medium described below to enrich lignocellulolytic facultative anaerobic cultures. The same sediment sample was used as starting bacterial inoculum of all three consortia and it was collected from a lake in the city of Groningen, The Netherlands (53°14′44.9376″N; 6°32′4.0236″E). The sediment was obtained below 1.5 m of water column depth. The temperature at the sampling point was 8°C and sediment suspension in water was near neutral pH (7.3). Total cell counts were performed from sediment suspension diluted decimally.

Enrichment cultures and bacterial community analysis

The mineral medium was prepared as follows (g l−1): K2HPO4, 1.0; NaCl, 1.0; MgSO4.7H2O, 0.1; NH4Cl, 2.0; CaCl2, 0.1; NaHCO3, 0.35; NaNO3, 0.22, the final pH was adjusted to 7.2. Flasks with rubber sealing lid and closed with screw caps containing 250 ml of mineral medium and 2.5 g of ball‐milled switchgrass (pretreated or raw) were autoclaved. A total of nine enrichments were prepared: three flasks using raw switchgrass as carbon source, three for ASG and the other three for HSG. Additional filter‐sterile solutions were introduced using a sterile syringe: metal solution, 0.3 ml; vitamin solution, 0.3 ml; resazurin solution 0.1%, 1 ml; sodium thioglycolate 1.5%, 3 ml. Metal solution was composed of (g l−1) EDTA, 0.5; Co(NO3), 0.1; MnSO4.H2O, 0.5; AlK(SO4)2, 1.0; CaCl2.2H2O, 0.1; ZnSO4.7H2O, 0.1; FeSO4.7H2O, 0.1; CuSO4.5H2O, 0.01; Na2MoO4.2H2O, 0.01; H3BO3, 0.01; Na2SeO4, 0.005; NiCl2.6H2O, 0.003. Vitamin solution contained (mg l−1) biotin, 2.0; folic acid, 2.0; pyridoxine‐HCl, 10.0; thiamine‐HCl, 5.0; riboflavin, 5.0; nicotinic acid, 5.0; DL‐calcium pantothenate, 5.0; vitamin B12, 0.1. Sediment contained 108 cells per ml and the same diluted sediment suspension, in sterile phosphate buffer, was used as inoculum and an aliquot was transferred to media using 1 ml syringe, the final cell concentration in each culture was 105 cells per ml. All enrichment cultures were anaerobic (by adding sodium thioglycolate as reducing agent and potassium nitrate, 1.0 g l−1, as terminal electron acceptor available; and indicated by resazurin) and were incubated in the dark at 25°C under slow shaking (80 rpm) for 1 month. Following this time period, bacterial suspension of the enrichment cultures was harvested anaerobically using syringe and transferred to empty sterile Vacutainer tubes (BD Biosciences). In order to recycle the lignocellulosic substrate into fresh mineral medium to further culture transfers, the switchgrass fibres were washed thoroughly with distilled water and air‐dried, and therefore the recalcitrant biomass is mainly reintroduced into the vials. The dry biomass was reintroduced to a new flask with fresh mineral medium. After autoclaving, total cell counts were performed from the latter culture and inoculated to its original substrate, at a final concentration of 105 cells per ml. This procedure was repeated twice, and then three culture transfers were carried out. Four samplings were carried out: (i) 2 days after the first transfer denoted as the beginning; (ii) 30 days following the first transfer; (iii) 30 days following the second transfer; and (iv) 30 days after the third transfer. Additionally, three control flasks per substrate without sediment suspension (inocula) were carried out as negative controls. Moreover, blank flasks were carried out with inoculums, but no carbon source added.

Bacteria quantification

Total bacterial counts of each sample replicates were performed at the end of each transfer using a Neubauer chamber (cell depth: 0.02 mm) on light microscope. In addition, an aliquot (1 ml) from the enrichment cultures and controls was harvested using 1 ml syringe at four sampling time, from which the genomic DNA of the community was extracted and purified using the Fast DNA kit (MP Bio) according to manufacturer's instructions. To estimate bacterial abundance, we used qPCR absolute quantification of 16S rRNA gene, with primers FP (5′‐GGTAGTCYAYGCMSTAAACG‐3′) and RP (5′‐GACARCCATGCASCACCTG‐3′) (Bach et al., 2002). Power SYBR Green PCR master mix (Finnzymes, Finland), 0.5 μl BSA (20 mg ml−1) 0.8 μM of each primer and 1 μl of template DNA (2–10 ng) of sample or dilution standard per well. Standard curve was prepared by decimally diluting plasmids containing partial 16S rRNA gene amplicons to range from 109 to 103 copy numbers. qPCR cycling detection (264 bp product) was performed as follows: initial denaturation at 95°C for 10 min; amplification for 40 cycles consisting of denaturation at 95°C for 27s, primer annealing at 62°C for 1 min, extension at 72°C for 30s, followed by melting curve analysis to confirm specific PCR products. Reactions were performed in three replicates on an ABI Prism 7300 Cycler (Applied Biosystems).

DGGE

Bacterial community structure was analysed by 16S rRNA gene PCR‐DGGE approach, as described by Brons and van Elsas (2008). Briefly, primers were F‐968 (5′‐AA CGC GAA GAA CCT TAC‐3′) with clamp (5‐CGC CCG GGG CGC GCC CCG GGC GGG GCG GGG GCA CGG GGG G) and R‐1401 (5′‐CGG TGT GTA CAA GGC CCG GGA ACG‐3′) and denaturing gradient range was 45–65% in 6% gels, samples ran for 16 h at 60°C (100 V). DGGE patterns were compared by clustering the different lanes, using the unweighted pair group method with Dice coefficient using GelCompar II software (Applied Maths, Sint‐Martens‐Latem, Belgium). DGGE patterns were also subjected to permutation test using permtest package of software R (version 2.15.3). Binary data from the DGGE profile were imported into R software (version 2.15.3) with vegan package (version 2.0–4) and BiodiversityR package (version 2.2), a site‐to‐site Bray–Curtis dissimilatory matrix constructed using the vegdist function; site ordinations plotted using the metaMDS and the ordisymbol functions.

16S rRNA gene pyrosequencing and data analysis

Bacterial 16S rRNA gene compositions in the three enrichment cultures along four sampling time (n = 3, total 36 enrichment samples) and in the original sediment sample were analysed using a tag‐encoded amplicon pyrosequencing assay, universal primers S‐D‐Bact‐0008‐a‐S‐16 (5′‐AGAGTTTGATCMTGGC‐3′) and S‐D‐Bact‐0907‐a‐A‐20 (5′‐CCGTCAATTCMTTTGAGTTT‐3′) (Klindworth et al., 2013) were used that targeted the variable regions V1–V3 of the 16S rRNA gene. A total of 37 samples were multiplexed and ran in a 1/8 plate 454 run. PCR amplification for library construction and pyrosequencing, with Roche 454 FLX instrument and Titanium reagents (Roche/454 Life Sciences), was performed by LGC Genomics, Germany. All 16S rRNA pyrosequencing reads were analysed using QIIME (version 1.7.0, available in Bio‐Linux 7) (Field et al., 2006; Caporaso et al., 2010), with the default arguments in the split_libraries.py function, after primer trimming. After trimming, sequences were grouped into OTUs; at 97% of nucleotide identity, using a standard QIIME pipeline, we used the UCLUST method in the pick_otus.py function and the RDP method to classify OTUs using the assign_taxonomy.py function. QIIME was also used for alpha diversity analyses (10 sampling repetitions without replacement at each sampling depth) including rarefaction to 500 reads per sample, computation of Chao1 and phylogenetic diversity (PD_whole_tree); and beta diversity analyses, unweighted Unifrac distance matrix was constructed from the phylogenetic tree and visualized using PCoA. ANOSIM was carried out with the R (http://www.R-project.org) examining pairwise UniFrac distances (9999 permutations). SFF files containing the original unfiltered pyrosequences can be downloaded from the NCBI Short Read Archive, accession number: SRP030618. Besides that, the QIIME IDs from each OTU were used to check for common OTUs among treatments in each time period through Venny (Oliveros, 2007). OTUs that represented more than 1% of reads in total per sample were used for hierarchical clustering coupled with heat map analysis based on relative abundance of OTUs that differed significantly, identified via ANOVA with the Tukey–Kramer post‐hoc test (confidence interval of 0.95) and the Benjamini–Hochberg multiple test FDR correction using the STAMP (Statistical Analysis of Metagenomic Profiles) software (Parks and Beiko, 2010).

Identification of (hemi)cellulolytic anaerobic bacteria isolated from enrichment cultures

After the first and third transfers, bacteria were isolated from each enrichment culture on R2A agar supplemented with NaNO3 0.2 g l−1. All plates were incubated in AnaeroJars using the system Anaerocult (Merck) to generate gas to anaerobiosis incubation. The jars were incubated at 25°C for 1 week before isolating individual colonies. Colonies were selected randomly and streaked on R2A with NaNO3 and again incubated under anoxic conditions, until purity was reached. Enzymatic activity tests for (hemi)cellulases were carried out in minimum agar (g l−1): NaNO3, 2.0; K2HPO4, 1.0; MgSO4, 0.5; KCl, 0.5; peptone, 0.2; agar, 17.0) using 2 g l−1 as a final concentration of CMC, xylan, glucose or fructose, (Jiménez et al., 2014). A drop (20 μl) of bacterial culture grown anaerobically overnight was inoculated on agar plate containing CMC, xylan, glucose or fructose. Plates were incubated at 28°C for 72 h under anaerobic conditions (using Anaerocult, Merck) and flooded with iodine (33% of I2 and 67% of KI) (Kasana et al., 2008) to reveal the hydrolysis halo on the agar plate. Plates containing fructose or glucose, used to evaluate anaerobic bacterial growth, were flooded with iodine. These plates were used as negative controls to evaluate CMC and xylan degradation assay (Jiménez et al., 2014). Bacterial 16S rRNA genes were amplified by colony PCR approach. Briefly, a small amount of pure colony was transferred to 50 μl of 50 mM NaOH solution using a toothpick and submitted to heat at 95°C for 15 min. Then, 3 μl of each cell lysate was added to a PCR premix tube, and PCR was performed using the following primers: 27F (5′‐AGAGTTTGATCMTGGCTCAG‐3′) and 1492R (5′‐GGTTACCTTGTTACGACTT‐3′). Amplification was performed under the following conditions: initial denaturation at 94°C for 5 min; 35 cycles of 94°C for 30s, 52°C for 30s, 72°C for 1 min; and a final extension step at 72°C for 10 min. Positive PCR products were purified using the Promega Wizard PCR Clean‐Up System (Promega). The purified PCR products were sequenced with the 27F primer, by LGC Genomics company, Germany, which generated high‐quality sequences of ca. 800 bp. Sequences were deposited in GenBank with accession numbers KJ194837–KJ194996. The sequences were identified using a local BLAST search against the pre‐formatted 16S microbial database (ftp://ftp.ncbi.nih.gov/blast/db/16SMicrobial.tar.gz) using blast‐2.2.22 + (http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi) with default settings. OTUs were also identified using a local BLAST search against the pre‐formatted 16S microbial database using blast‐2.2.22 + with default settings, in order to associate the taxonomic identification of the isolates.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.
  32 in total

Review 1.  The rare bacterial biosphere.

Authors:  Carlos Pedrós-Alió
Journal:  Ann Rev Mar Sci       Date:  2012

Review 2.  Changes through time: integrating microorganisms into the study of succession.

Authors:  Noah Fierer; Diana Nemergut; Rob Knight; Joseph M Craine
Journal:  Res Microbiol       Date:  2010-06-22       Impact factor: 3.992

3.  Analysis of bacterial communities in soil by use of denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis and clone libraries, as influenced by different reverse primers.

Authors:  Jolanda K Brons; Jan Dirk van Elsas
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2008-02-29       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Use of nitrate to control sulfide generation by sulfate-reducing bacteria associated with oily waste.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 3.346

5.  Symbiotic Relationship of Bacteroides cellulosolvens and Clostridium saccharolyticum in Cellulose Fermentation.

Authors:  W D Murray
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Effects of different pretreatment strategies on corn stalk acidogenic fermentation using a microbial consortium.

Authors:  Peng Guo; Kazuhiro Mochidzuki; Wei Cheng; Ming Zhou; Hong Gao; Dan Zheng; Xiaofen Wang; Zongjun Cui
Journal:  Bioresour Technol       Date:  2011-05-07       Impact factor: 9.642

Review 7.  Pathways for degradation of lignin in bacteria and fungi.

Authors:  Timothy D H Bugg; Mark Ahmad; Elizabeth M Hardiman; Rahman Rahmanpour
Journal:  Nat Prod Rep       Date:  2011-09-15       Impact factor: 13.423

8.  A rapid and easy method for the detection of microbial cellulases on agar plates using gram's iodine.

Authors:  Ramesh Chand Kasana; Richa Salwan; Hena Dhar; Som Dutt; Arvind Gulati
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2008-09-23       Impact factor: 2.188

9.  Thermally treated grass fibers as colonizable substrate for beneficial bacterial inoculum.

Authors:  R Trifonova; J Postma; J J M H Ketelaars; J D van Elsas
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2008-03-27       Impact factor: 4.552

10.  Evaluation of general 16S ribosomal RNA gene PCR primers for classical and next-generation sequencing-based diversity studies.

Authors:  Anna Klindworth; Elmar Pruesse; Timmy Schweer; Jörg Peplies; Christian Quast; Matthias Horn; Frank Oliver Glöckner
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2012-08-28       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  4 in total

1.  Hydrological and soil physiochemical variables determine the rhizospheric microbiota in subtropical lakeshore areas.

Authors:  Xiaoke Zhang; Huili Wang; Zhifei Li; Jun Xie; Jiajia Ni
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2020-09-29       Impact factor: 2.984

2.  Characterization of three plant biomass-degrading microbial consortia by metagenomics- and metasecretomics-based approaches.

Authors:  Diego Javier Jiménez; Maria Julia de Lima Brossi; Julia Schückel; Stjepan Krešimir Kračun; William George Tycho Willats; Jan Dirk van Elsas
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2016-07-14       Impact factor: 4.813

3.  Substrate Shift Reveals Roles for Members of Bacterial Consortia in Degradation of Plant Cell Wall Polymers.

Authors:  Camila Carlos; Huan Fan; Cameron R Currie
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 5.640

Review 4.  A Review on Bacterial Contribution to Lignocellulose Breakdown into Useful Bio-Products.

Authors:  Ogechukwu Bose Chukwuma; Mohd Rafatullah; Husnul Azan Tajarudin; Norli Ismail
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-06-03       Impact factor: 3.390

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.