Literature DB >> 26875040

[Good practice guidelines for health information].

.   

Abstract

Evidence-based health information is distinguished by the provision of an unbiased and trustworthy description of the current state of medical knowledge. It enables people to learn more about health and disease, and to make health-related decisions - on their own or together with others - reflecting their attitudes and lifestyle. To adequately serve this purpose, health information must be evidence-based. A working group from the German Network for Evidence-based Medicine (Deutsches Netzwerk Evidenzbasierte Medizin) has developed a first draft of good practice guidelines for health information (Gute Praxis Gesundheitsinformation) with the aim of providing support for authors and publishers of evidence-based health information. The group included researchers, patient representatives, journalists and developers of health information. The criteria for evidence-based health information were developed and agreed upon within this author group, and then made available for public comment. All submitted comments were documented and assessed regarding the need to revise or amend the draft. Changes were subsequently implemented following approval by the author group. Gute Praxis Gesundheitsinformation calls for a transparent methodological approach in the development of health information. To achieve this, evidence-based information must be based on (a) a systematic literature search, (b) a justified selection of evidence, (c) unbiased reporting of relevant results, (d) appropriate factual and linguistic communication of uncertainties, (e) either avoidance of any direct recommendations or a strict division between the reporting of results and the derivation of recommendations, (f) the consideration of current evidence on the communication of figures, risks and probabilities, and (g) transparent information about the authors and publishers of the health information, including their funding sources. Gute Praxis Gesundheitsinformation lists a total of 16 aspects to be addressed in methods papers. Gute Praxis Gesundheitsinformation is a tool that puts forward methodological aspects to be considered when developing health information. In order to be transparent, descriptions of the underlying methods and processes need to be published in easily accessible methods papers describing the general procedure.
Copyright © 2015. Published by Elsevier GmbH.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Entscheidungshilfen; Evidence based medicine; Evidenzbasierte Medizin; Gesundheitsinformation; Qualitätsstandard; decision aid; information services/standards health information

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26875040     DOI: 10.1016/j.zefq.2015.11.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes        ISSN: 1865-9217


  12 in total

1.  The Quality of Informed Consent Forms-a Systematic Review and Critical Analysis.

Authors:  Julia Lühnen; Ingrid Mühlhauser; Anke Steckelberg
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 5.594

2.  [Evaluation of the decision aid "Entscheidungshilfe Prostatakrebs" from the patients' view : Results from the first three months].

Authors:  C Groeben; A Ihrig; T Hölscher; T Krones; E Kessler; S Kliesch; C Wülfing; R Koch; M P Wirth; J Huber
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 0.639

3.  The Foundation in Evidence of Medical and Dental Telephone Consultations.

Authors:  Martina Albrecht; Florian Isenbeck; Jüürgen Kasper; Ingrid Mühlhauser; Anke Steckelberg
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2016-06-06       Impact factor: 5.594

4.  Understanding the role of health information in patients' experiences: secondary analysis of qualitative narrative interviews with people diagnosed with cancer in Germany.

Authors:  Susanne Blödt; Maleen Kaiser; Yvonne Adam; Sandra Adami; Martin Schultze; Jacqueline Müller-Nordhorn; Christine Holmberg
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Efficacy of a training programme to support the application of the guideline evidence-based health information: study protocol of a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Julia Lühnen; Birte Berger-Höger; Burkhard Haastert; Jana Hinneburg; Jürgen Kasper; Anke Steckelberg
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2020-05-25       Impact factor: 2.279

6.  Crawling the German Health Web: Exploratory Study and Graph Analysis.

Authors:  Richard Zowalla; Thomas Wetter; Daniel Pfeifer
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2020-07-24       Impact factor: 5.428

7.  Active Annotation in Evaluating the Credibility of Web-Based Medical Information: Guidelines for Creating Training Data Sets for Machine Learning.

Authors:  Aleksandra Nabożny; Bartłomiej Balcerzak; Adam Wierzbicki; Mikołaj Morzy; Małgorzata Chlabicz
Journal:  JMIR Med Inform       Date:  2021-11-26

8.  Development of decision aids for female BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers in Germany to support preference-sensitive decision-making.

Authors:  Sibylle Kautz-Freimuth; Marcus Redaèlli; Kerstin Rhiem; Andrea Vodermaier; Lisa Krassuski; Kathrin Nicolai; Miriam Schnepper; Violetta Kuboth; Julia Dick; Vera Vennedey; Regina Wiedemann; Rita Schmutzler; Stephanie Stock
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2021-06-05       Impact factor: 2.796

9.  A blended learning training programme for health information providers to enhance implementation of the Guideline Evidence-based Health Information: development and qualitative pilot study.

Authors:  Jana Hinneburg; Julia Lühnen; Anke Steckelberg; Birte Berger-Höger
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2020-03-18       Impact factor: 2.463

10.  MAPPinfo, mapping quality of health information: study protocol for a validation study of an assessment instrument.

Authors:  Jürgen Kasper; Julia Lühnen; Jana Hinneburg; Andrea Siebenhofer; Nicole Posch; Birte Berger-Höger; Alexander Grafe; Jan Keppler; A Steckelberg
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-11-03       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.