Juliet F Gibson1, Jing Huang2, Kristina J Liu3, Kacie R Carlson1, Francine Foss4, Jaehyuk Choi1, Richard Edelson1, Jerry W Hussong5, Ramsey Mohl5, Sally Hill5, Michael Girardi6. 1. Department of Dermatology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut. 2. Department of Dermatology, New York Presbyterian Hospital/Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, New York. 3. Department of Dermatology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. 4. Department of Hematology and Oncology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut. 5. Department of Pathology/ARUP Laboratories, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah. 6. Department of Dermatology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut. Electronic address: michael.girardi@yale.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Accurate quantification of malignant cells in the peripheral blood of patients with cutaneous T-cell lymphoma is important for early detection, prognosis, and monitoring disease burden. OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine the spectrum of current clinical practices; critically evaluate elements of current International Society for Cutaneous Lymphomas (ISCL) B1 and B2 staging criteria; and assess the potential role of T-cell receptor-Vβ analysis by flow cytometry. METHODS: We assessed current clinical practices by survey, and performed a retrospective analysis of 161 patients evaluated at Yale (2011-2014) to compare the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of parameters for ISCL B2 staging. RESULTS: There was heterogeneity in clinical practices among institutions. ISCL B1 criteria did not capture 5 Yale cohort cases with immunophenotypic abnormalities that later progressed. T-cell receptor-Vβ testing was more specific than polymerase chain reaction and aided diagnosis in detecting clonality, but was of limited benefit in quantification of tumor burden. LIMITATIONS: Because of limited follow-up involving a single center, further investigation will be necessary to conclude whether our proposed diagnostic algorithm is of general clinical benefit. CONCLUSION: We propose further study of modified B1 criteria: CD4/CD8 ratio 5 or greater, %CD4(+) CD26(-) 20% or greater, or %CD4(+) CD7(-) 20% or greater, with evidence of clonality. T-cell receptor-Vβ testing should be considered in future diagnostic and staging algorithms.
BACKGROUND: Accurate quantification of malignant cells in the peripheral blood of patients with cutaneous T-cell lymphoma is important for early detection, prognosis, and monitoring disease burden. OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine the spectrum of current clinical practices; critically evaluate elements of current International Society for Cutaneous Lymphomas (ISCL) B1 and B2 staging criteria; and assess the potential role of T-cell receptor-Vβ analysis by flow cytometry. METHODS: We assessed current clinical practices by survey, and performed a retrospective analysis of 161 patients evaluated at Yale (2011-2014) to compare the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of parameters for ISCL B2 staging. RESULTS: There was heterogeneity in clinical practices among institutions. ISCL B1 criteria did not capture 5 Yale cohort cases with immunophenotypic abnormalities that later progressed. T-cell receptor-Vβ testing was more specific than polymerase chain reaction and aided diagnosis in detecting clonality, but was of limited benefit in quantification of tumor burden. LIMITATIONS: Because of limited follow-up involving a single center, further investigation will be necessary to conclude whether our proposed diagnostic algorithm is of general clinical benefit. CONCLUSION: We propose further study of modified B1 criteria: CD4/CD8 ratio 5 or greater, %CD4(+) CD26(-) 20% or greater, or %CD4(+) CD7(-) 20% or greater, with evidence of clonality. T-cell receptor-Vβ testing should be considered in future diagnostic and staging algorithms.
Authors: Eric C Vonderheid; Christine M Boselli; Michael Conroy; Laurie Casaus; Lisa Cheley Espinoza; Prakash Venkataramani; Robert D Bigler; J Steve Hou Journal: J Invest Dermatol Date: 2005-03 Impact factor: 8.551
Authors: Ellen J Kim; Stephen Hess; Stephen K Richardson; Sara Newton; Louise C Showe; Bernice M Benoit; Ravi Ubriani; Carmela C Vittorio; Jacqueline M Junkins-Hopkins; Maria Wysocka; Alain H Rook Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2005-04 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: William G Morice; Jerry A Katzmann; Mark R Pittelkow; Rokea A el-Azhary; Lawrence E Gibson; Curtis A Hanson Journal: Am J Clin Pathol Date: 2006-03 Impact factor: 2.493
Authors: E Papadavid; J Economidou; A Psarra; V Kapsimali; V Mantzana; C Antoniou; K Limas; A Stratigos; N Stavrianeas; G Avgerinou; A Katsambas Journal: Br J Dermatol Date: 2003-04 Impact factor: 9.302
Authors: Terkild Brink Buus; Andreas Willerslev-Olsen; Simon Fredholm; Edda Blümel; Claudia Nastasi; Maria Gluud; Tengpeng Hu; Lise M Lindahl; Lars Iversen; Hanne Fogh; Robert Gniadecki; Ivan V Litvinov; Jenny L Persson; Charlotte Menné Bonefeld; Carsten Geisler; Jan Pravsgaard Christensen; Thorbjørn Krejsgaard; Thomas Litman; Anders Woetmann; Niels Ødum Journal: Blood Adv Date: 2018-08-28
Authors: Sara Yumeen; Fatima N Mirza; Julia M Lewis; Amber Loren O King; Sa Rang Kim; Kacie R Carlson; Sheila R Umlauf; Yulia V Surovtseva; Francine M Foss; Michael Girardi Journal: Blood Adv Date: 2020-05-26
Authors: Alyxzandria M Gaydosik; Connor J Stonesifer; Alexandra E Khaleel; Larisa J Geskin; Patrizia Fuschiotti Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2022-06-13 Impact factor: 13.801
Authors: Benoit M Cyrenne; Julia M Lewis; Jason G Weed; Kacie R Carlson; Fatima N Mirza; Francine M Foss; Michael Girardi Journal: Blood Date: 2017-10-02 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Sa Rang Kim; Julia M Lewis; Benoit M Cyrenne; Patrick F Monico; Fatima N Mirza; Kacie R Carlson; Francine M Foss; Michael Girardi Journal: Oncotarget Date: 2018-06-26