| Literature DB >> 26874523 |
Lina Fu1,2, Xiuling Xu1, Ruotong Ren1,3, Jun Wu4,5, Weiqi Zhang1,3, Jiping Yang1, Xiaoqing Ren1, Si Wang1, Yang Zhao1, Liang Sun6, Yang Yu7, Zhaoxia Wang8, Ze Yang6, Yun Yuan8, Jie Qiao7, Juan Carlos Izpisua Belmonte9, Jing Qu10, Guang-Hui Liu11,12,13,14.
Abstract
Xeroderma pigmentosum (XP) is a group of genetic disorders caused by mutations of XP-associated genes, resulting in impairment of DNA repair. XP patients frequently exhibit neurological degeneration, but the underlying mechanism is unknown, in part due to lack of proper disease models. Here, we generated patient-specific induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) harboring mutations in five different XP genes including XPA, XPB, XPC, XPG, and XPV. These iPSCs were further differentiated to neural cells, and their susceptibility to DNA damage stress was investigated. Mutation of XPA in either neural stem cells (NSCs) or neurons resulted in severe DNA damage repair defects, and these neural cells with mutant XPA were hyper-sensitive to DNA damage-induced apoptosis. Thus, XP-mutant neural cells represent valuable tools to clarify the molecular mechanisms of neurological abnormalities in the XP patients.Entities:
Keywords: disease model; iPSC; neural stem cell; neuron; xeroderma pigmentosum
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26874523 PMCID: PMC4791426 DOI: 10.1007/s13238-016-0244-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Protein Cell ISSN: 1674-800X Impact factor: 14.870
Figure 1Genotyping fibroblasts from five XP patients. (A) Schematic diagram of NER pathway in the nucleus. Upon DNA damage, XPC and HR23B recognize damage site, XPA verifies, XPB and XPD unwind DNA double strands, finally XPF and XPG excise the damaged strand. All of these proteins function together to repair UV-induced DNA damage. GGR: Global genome repair; TCR: Transcription-coupled repair. (B) DNA sequencing showing the different mutations in XPA, XPB, XPC, XPG, XPV genes in fibroblasts from five XP patients. Fibroblasts isolated from a healthy individual were used as a control
Figure 2Generation and characterization of transgene-free XP-iPSCs. (A) Summary of the generated iPSC colony number after reprogramming of WT and XP mutant fibroblasts. (B) Phase-contrast images showing morphologies of WT, XPA, XPB, XPC, XPG, XPV mutant patient fibroblasts (top panels) and fibroblast-derived iPSCs (bottom panels). (C) Immunostaining of WT and XP-iPSCs for NANOG, OCT4, and SOX2. Scale bar, 50 μm. (D) qPCR analysis showing no or little residual episomal vector element EBNA-1 in XP-iPSCs and WT-iPSCs. Human fibroblasts 4 days after electroporated with pCXLE-hOCT3/4-shp53-F, pCXLE-hSK, and pCXLE-hUL were included as positive control, and human H9 ESCs were used as negative control. Data are shown as mean ± SD. n = 3. (E) Karyotyping analysis of XP-iPSCs. (F) Immunostaining for TUJ1 (ectoderm), α-SMA (mesoderm), and FOXA2 (endoderm) of teratomas derived from XP-iPSCs. Nuclei were stained with Hoechst 33342. Scale bar, 50 μm
Figure 6Schematic illustration of disease modeling using XPA patient-specific iPSCs. Both NSCs and neurons derived from XPA patient iPSCs showed compromised NER and increased susceptibility to DNA damage-induced apoptosis, which may contribute to XP-associated neurological disorders
Figure 3Generation and characterization of XP-NSCs. (A) Schematic illustration of neural stem cell differentiation from iPSCs. (B) Immunostaining of WT and XP-mutant NSCs for NESTIN and PAX6. Nuclei were stained with Hoechst 33342. Scale bar, 50 μm. (C) Immunostaining of WT and XP-mutant neurons for TUJ1 and MAP2. Nuclei were stained with Hoechst 33342. Scale bar, 50 μm
Figure 4XPA-mutant NSCs showed profound impairment of NER and hypersensitive to UV-induced apoptosis. (A) Immunostaining of CPD in WT and XP-mutant NSCs cultured on coverslips in 24-well plate in the absence or presence of 1 J/m2 UV exposure. The images were taken 20 min or 48 h after UV irradiation, respectively. Nuclei were stained with Hoechst 33342. Scale bar, 50 μm. (B) Quantitative analysis of fluorescence intensity of CPD in WT and XPA-mutant NSCs in the indicated contexts. 60–100 nuclei were used for calculation. (C) Apoptosis analysis in WT and XPA-mutant NSCs 24 h after 1 J/m2 UV treatment (quantitative data shown on the right). (D) Western blots showing PARP cleavage using anti-PARP (top blots) and anti-cleaved PARP (middle blots) antibodies respectively in WT and XPA-mutant NSC 24 h after being exposed to 1 J/m2 UV. β-Actin was used as a loading control. (E) Representative TUNEL staining in WT and XPA-mutant NSCs cultured on coverslips in 24-well plate in the absence or presence of UV treatment (quantitative data shown on the right). Nuclei were stained with Hoechst 33342. Scale bar, 50 μm. Data are shown as mean ± SD. n = 3. For (C) and (D), cells were cultured on 6-well plates without coverslips. (F) Clonal expansion analysis of WT and XPA mutant NSCs. Data are shown as mean ± SD. n = 3. (G) Cell migration analysis of WT and XPA mutant NSCs. Data are shown as mean ± SD. n = 3
Figure 5XPA-iPSCs derived neurons showed increased susceptibility to UV-induced cell apoptosis. (A) Schematic illustration of neuronal differentiation from NSCs. (B) CPD immunostaining in WT and XPA-mutant neurons cultured on coverslips in 24-well plate in the absence or presence of UV exposure. Nuclei were stained with Hoechst 33342. Scale bar, 50 μm. 60–100 nuclei were used for calculation. (C) Representative images of TUNEL staining in WT and XPA-mutant neurons cultured on coverslips in 24-well plate in the absence or presence of UV exposure. Nuclei were stained with Hoechst 33342. Scale bar, 50 μm. Data are shown as mean ± SD. 60–100 nuclei were used for calculation